Effects of modifying hinotori™ surgical robot system on perioperative outcome of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Teishima, Jun [1 ]
Wakita, Naoto [1 ]
Bando, Yukari [1 ]
Okamura, Yasuyoshi [1 ]
Suzuki, Kotaro [1 ]
Hara, Takuto [1 ]
Terakawa, Tomoaki [1 ]
Chiba, Koji [1 ]
Matsushita, Kei [1 ]
Nakano, Yuzo [1 ]
Kitatsuji, Hiroaki [2 ]
Miyake, Hideaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, 7-5-1 Kusunoki Cho,Chuo Ku, Kobe 6500017, Japan
[2] Medicaroid Corp, Kobe, Japan
关键词
hinotori (TM) surgical robot system; modification; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; LEARNING-CURVE; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; NEPHRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1111/iju.15593
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives One of the main advantages of the hinotori (TM) surgical robot system (HSRS) is that it can be easily adjusted. This study aimed to clarify the effects of modifying the HSRS on the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods Overall, 158 cases of RARP using the HSRS were classified into three groups based on the modification to the system: group A (no modification, 70 cases), group B (addition of the ability to switch between two types of scopes and to adjust the arm base tilt back and forth, left and right, 42 cases), and group C (reduction of arm floating sensation, mitigation of emergency stop during arm collision, and addition of clutch function via hand switch in addition to foot pedal, 46 cases). The perioperative outcomes of each group were compared. Results The median of operation time, cockpit time, and cockpit time excluding the time required for lymph node dissection of group C were 223, 146, and 135 min, respectively, where are significantly shorter than those of group A (308, 228, and 208 min, p < 0.0001, respectively) and group B (319, 241, and 214 min, p < 0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rate of positive margin rates and the pad-free rate before the first follow-up visit among these three groups. The complication rates in groups A, B, and C were 11.4%, 9.4%, and 8.4% (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II), and 4.3%, 2.4%, and 0% (grade III), respectively. Conclusions The modifications to the HSRS have enabled smoother surgical procedures for RARP.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 50
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF TRIFECTA OUTCOME IN ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Inoue, Shogo
    Hieda, Keisuke
    Hayashi, Tetsutaro
    Teishima, Jun
    Matsubara, Akio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E300 - E300
  • [42] hinotori™ vs. da Vinci®: propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kohjimoto, Yasuo
    Yamashita, Shimpei
    Iwagami, Sohei
    Muraoka, Satoshi
    Wakamiya, Takahito
    Hara, Isao
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [43] SURGICAL SKILL AND PATIENT OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Peabody, James O.
    Dunn, Rodney L.
    Brachulis, Andrew
    Kim, Tae
    Linsell, Susan
    Lane, Brian R.
    Sarle, Richard
    Montie, James
    Miller, David C.
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1129 - E1129
  • [44] An Unbiased Prospective Report of Perioperative Complications of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Lasser, Michael S.
    Renzulli, Joseph, II
    Turini, George A., III
    Haleblian, George
    Sax, Harry C.
    Pareek, Gyan
    UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (05) : 1083 - 1089
  • [45] Transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and surgical outcomes
    Zhou, Xiaochen
    Fu, Bin
    Zhang, Cheng
    Liu, Weipeng
    Guo, Ju
    Chen, Luyao
    Lei, Enjun
    Zhang, Xu
    Wang, Gongxian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (02) : 300 - 308
  • [46] Surgical techniques to preserve continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Katsimperis, Stamatios
    Juliebo-Jones, Patrick
    Ta, Anthony
    Tandogdu, Zafer
    Al-Bermani, Osama
    Bellos, Themistoklis
    Esperto, Francesco
    Tonyali, Senol
    Mitsogiannis, Iraklis
    Skolarikos, Andreas
    Varkarakis, Ioannis
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Tzelves, Lazaros
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [47] Effects of aging on complications following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Koterazawa, Shigeki
    Kubota, Masashi
    Sumiyoshi, Takayuki
    Saito, Ryoichi
    Takaoka, Naoto
    Hattori, Yuto
    Shimizu, Yosuke
    Kanno, Toru
    Soda, Takeshi
    Okada, Yoshiyuki
    Tsuchihashi, Kazunari
    Sekine, Yuya
    Negoro, Hiromitsu
    Kurahashi, Ryoma
    Shimatani, Kimihiro
    Sawada, Atsuro
    Akamatsu, Shusuke
    Goto, Takayuki
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 30 (02) : 340 - 350
  • [48] IMPACT OF INCREASED USE OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON OPEN AND ROBOT-ASSISTED PROSTATECTOMIES
    Hofer, Matthias
    Meeks, Joshua
    Cashy, John
    Zhao, Lee
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E32 - E33
  • [49] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: The learning curve
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A134 - A134
  • [50] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is the Dust Settling?
    Menon, Mani
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 7 - 9