Effects of modifying hinotori™ surgical robot system on perioperative outcome of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Teishima, Jun [1 ]
Wakita, Naoto [1 ]
Bando, Yukari [1 ]
Okamura, Yasuyoshi [1 ]
Suzuki, Kotaro [1 ]
Hara, Takuto [1 ]
Terakawa, Tomoaki [1 ]
Chiba, Koji [1 ]
Matsushita, Kei [1 ]
Nakano, Yuzo [1 ]
Kitatsuji, Hiroaki [2 ]
Miyake, Hideaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, 7-5-1 Kusunoki Cho,Chuo Ku, Kobe 6500017, Japan
[2] Medicaroid Corp, Kobe, Japan
关键词
hinotori (TM) surgical robot system; modification; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; LEARNING-CURVE; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; NEPHRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1111/iju.15593
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives One of the main advantages of the hinotori (TM) surgical robot system (HSRS) is that it can be easily adjusted. This study aimed to clarify the effects of modifying the HSRS on the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods Overall, 158 cases of RARP using the HSRS were classified into three groups based on the modification to the system: group A (no modification, 70 cases), group B (addition of the ability to switch between two types of scopes and to adjust the arm base tilt back and forth, left and right, 42 cases), and group C (reduction of arm floating sensation, mitigation of emergency stop during arm collision, and addition of clutch function via hand switch in addition to foot pedal, 46 cases). The perioperative outcomes of each group were compared. Results The median of operation time, cockpit time, and cockpit time excluding the time required for lymph node dissection of group C were 223, 146, and 135 min, respectively, where are significantly shorter than those of group A (308, 228, and 208 min, p < 0.0001, respectively) and group B (319, 241, and 214 min, p < 0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rate of positive margin rates and the pad-free rate before the first follow-up visit among these three groups. The complication rates in groups A, B, and C were 11.4%, 9.4%, and 8.4% (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II), and 4.3%, 2.4%, and 0% (grade III), respectively. Conclusions The modifications to the HSRS have enabled smoother surgical procedures for RARP.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 50
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Radical prostatectomy using the Hinotori robot-assisted surgical system: Docking-free design may contribute to reduction in postoperative pain
    Sasaki, Yutaro
    Kusuhara, Yoshito
    Oyama, Takuro
    Nishiyama, Mitsuki
    Kobayashi, Saki
    Daizumoto, Kei
    Tomida, Ryotaro
    Ueno, Yoshiteru
    Fukawa, Tomoya
    Yamaguchi, Kunihisa
    Yamamoto, Yasuyo
    Takahashi, Masayuki
    Kanayama, Hiroomi
    Furukawa, Junya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2024, 20 (03):
  • [32] Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: Prostate Size influences Surgical Outcome
    Lorenz, Judith
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2025, 56 (01)
  • [33] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a novel robot-assisted modular platform: Perioperative outcomes from the largest multicentric series
    Prata, F.
    Totaro, A.
    Montanaro, F.
    Sighinolfi, C.
    Mottaran, A.
    Civitella, A.
    Bientinesi, R.
    Gandi, C.
    Iannuzzi, A.
    Marino, F.
    Veccia, A.
    Piazza, P.
    Ragusa, A.
    Russo, P.
    Scarciglia, E.
    Tedesco, F.
    Schiavina, R.
    Rocco, B.
    Brunocilla, E.
    Antonelli, A.
    Sacco, E.
    Bassi, P.
    Scarpa, R. M.
    Papalia, R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S2014 - S2015
  • [34] Robot-assisted adrenalectomy using a hinotori surgical robot system: Report of first series of six cases
    Motoyama, Daisuke
    Matsushita, Yuto
    Watanabe, Hiromitsu
    Tamura, Keita
    Otsuka, Atsushi
    Fujisawa, Masato
    Miyake, Hideaki
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2023, 16 (03) : 489 - 495
  • [35] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system: feasibility, operative setup and surgical outcomes
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Chierigo, Francesco
    Cellini, Valerio
    Tappero, Stefano
    Olivero, Alberto
    Maltzman, Ofir
    Caviglia, Alberto
    Piccione, Antonio
    Buratto, Carlo
    Barbieri, Michele
    Napoli, Giancarlo
    Strada, Elena
    Palagonia, Erika
    Petralia, Giovanni
    Secco, Silvia
    Di Trapani, Dario
    Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo
    Galfano, Antonio
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (01) : 166 - 170
  • [36] Predictors of surgical difficulty according to surgical proficiency in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Uchida, Takato
    Hasegawa, Masanori
    Umemoto, Tatsuya
    Nakajima, Nobuyuki
    Nitta, Masahiro
    Kawamura, Yoshiaki
    Shoji, Sunao
    Miyajima, Akira
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (06): : 3416 - 3424
  • [37] An observational study of volume-outcome effects for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in England
    Gray, William K.
    Day, Jamie
    Briggs, Tim W. R.
    Harrison, Simon
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 (01) : 93 - 103
  • [38] Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy using novel surgical robot platform, hinotori: Report of initial series of 13 cases
    Motoyama, Daisuke
    Matsushita, Yuto
    Watanabe, Hiromitsu
    Tamura, Keita
    Otsuka, Atsushi
    Fujisawa, Masato
    Miyake, Hideaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, : 1175 - 1179
  • [39] Short-term surgical outcomes of robot-assisted colectomy for colon cancer using the hinotori Surgical Robot System
    Morohara, Koji
    Katsuno, Hidetoshi
    Endo, Tomoyoshi
    Kikuchi, Kenji
    Nakamura, Kenichi
    Matsuo, Kazuhiro
    Higashiguchi, Takahiko
    Koide, Tetsuya
    Hanai, Tsunekazu
    Morise, Zenichi
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2025, 41 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [40] Surgical gestures to evaluate apical dissection of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Otiato, Maxwell X.
    Ma, Runzhuo
    Chu, Timothy N.
    Wong, Elyssa Y.
    Wagner, Christian
    Hung, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)