Parametric Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Ice Giant Aerocapture Aerothermodynamics

被引:0
|
作者
Rataczak, Jens A. [1 ]
Boyd, Kin D. [1 ]
McMahon, Jay W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Aerosp Engn Sci, Boulder, CO 80302 USA
来源
AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024 | 2024年
关键词
RADIATIVE HEATING PREDICTIONS; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; SATURN; URANUS; ENTRY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Accurate characterization of the aerothermodynamic environment for Ice Giant aerocapture is necessary for thermal protection system design and overall mission reliability. However, uncertainties in the models used to simulate these flows produce substantial variations in the predicted aerothermodynamic quantities of interest, particularly the radiative heating. There is speculation over the effect of freestream methane on the aerothermal environments, and the amount of methane present in Ice Giant atmospheres is not well known. As such, this work presents a sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification of the convective and radiative heating distributions, and aerodynamics of an entry vehicle along an Ice Giant aerocapture trajectory. Sources of uncertainty include chemical reaction rates, transport properties, vibrational-relaxation rates, and the freestream methane concentration. A non-intrusive, pointcollocated polynomial chaos expansion technique is employed to compute Sobol indices and estimate epistemic uncertainty bounds of the aerothermal quantities of interest. The convective heating is most sensitive to transport properties and the rate of the hydrogen electron-impact ionization (EII) reaction. The stagnation region is dominated by dissociation/ionization phenomena, while the shoulder region is dominated by recombination. Overall uncertainty in the convective-heating distributions ranges from 4.40 to 11.7%. Radiative-heating uncertainty is much larger, with upper bounds exceeding 160% of the nominal predictions. A slight sensitivity of the radiative heating to the freestream methane concentration is observed, but the majority of the uncertainty at the stagnation point and along the frustum is attributed to the dissociation of H-2 with partner H. At lower altitudes, the radiative heating at the shoulder of the vehicle is highly sensitive to the reverse direction of the EII reaction rate due to its impact on the electronic state population of H. This behavior decreases as the altitude increases due to decreased levels of ionization. Aerodynamic coefficients are relatively insensitive to the CFD input parameters, with uncertainties of a few percent at most.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification of a seismic risk model for road networks
    Allen, Eduardo
    Chamorro, Alondra
    Poulos, Alan
    Castro, Sebastian
    Carlos de la Llera, Juan
    Echaveguren, Tomas
    COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 37 (04) : 516 - 530
  • [42] Transition of the variational sensitivity analysis to polymorphic uncertainty quantification to soil investigations
    Henning, C.
    Ricken, T.
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS: INNOVATIONS, MECHANICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, : 297 - 302
  • [43] Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of neuron models with ion concentration dynamics
    Signorelli, Letizia
    Manzoni, Andrea
    Saetra, Marte J.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [44] Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Subsurface Defect Detection with Sparse Models
    Zygiridis, Theodoros
    Kyrgiazoglou, Athanasios
    Amanatiadis, Stamatios
    Kantartzis, Nikolaos
    Theodoulidis, Theodoros
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2024, 43 (04)
  • [45] Adaptive multi-index collocation for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis
    Jakeman, John D.
    Eldred, Michael S.
    Geraci, Gianluca
    Gorodetsky, Alex
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 121 (06) : 1314 - 1343
  • [46] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of transonic aerodynamics about airfoil
    Wu, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Song, Shufang
    Ye, Zhengyin
    Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2015, 47 (04): : 587 - 595
  • [47] Model and analysis of single event transient sensitivity based on uncertainty quantification
    Liu, Baojun
    Cai, Li
    MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 2022, 90
  • [48] Uncertainty quantification of dry woven fabrics: A sensitivity analysis on material properties
    Akmar, A. B. Ilyani
    Lahmer, T.
    Bordas, S. P. A.
    Beex, L. A. A.
    Rabczuk, T.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2014, 116 : 1 - 17
  • [49] Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models
    Pathmanathan, Pras
    Cordeiro, Jonathan M.
    Gray, Richard A.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [50] Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of blade geometric deviation on compressor performance
    Ji, T. Y.
    Chu, W. L.
    Guo, Z. T.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 128 (1330): : 2945 - 2963