Parametric Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Ice Giant Aerocapture Aerothermodynamics

被引:0
|
作者
Rataczak, Jens A. [1 ]
Boyd, Kin D. [1 ]
McMahon, Jay W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Aerosp Engn Sci, Boulder, CO 80302 USA
来源
AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024 | 2024年
关键词
RADIATIVE HEATING PREDICTIONS; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; SATURN; URANUS; ENTRY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Accurate characterization of the aerothermodynamic environment for Ice Giant aerocapture is necessary for thermal protection system design and overall mission reliability. However, uncertainties in the models used to simulate these flows produce substantial variations in the predicted aerothermodynamic quantities of interest, particularly the radiative heating. There is speculation over the effect of freestream methane on the aerothermal environments, and the amount of methane present in Ice Giant atmospheres is not well known. As such, this work presents a sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification of the convective and radiative heating distributions, and aerodynamics of an entry vehicle along an Ice Giant aerocapture trajectory. Sources of uncertainty include chemical reaction rates, transport properties, vibrational-relaxation rates, and the freestream methane concentration. A non-intrusive, pointcollocated polynomial chaos expansion technique is employed to compute Sobol indices and estimate epistemic uncertainty bounds of the aerothermal quantities of interest. The convective heating is most sensitive to transport properties and the rate of the hydrogen electron-impact ionization (EII) reaction. The stagnation region is dominated by dissociation/ionization phenomena, while the shoulder region is dominated by recombination. Overall uncertainty in the convective-heating distributions ranges from 4.40 to 11.7%. Radiative-heating uncertainty is much larger, with upper bounds exceeding 160% of the nominal predictions. A slight sensitivity of the radiative heating to the freestream methane concentration is observed, but the majority of the uncertainty at the stagnation point and along the frustum is attributed to the dissociation of H-2 with partner H. At lower altitudes, the radiative heating at the shoulder of the vehicle is highly sensitive to the reverse direction of the EII reaction rate due to its impact on the electronic state population of H. This behavior decreases as the altitude increases due to decreased levels of ionization. Aerodynamic coefficients are relatively insensitive to the CFD input parameters, with uncertainties of a few percent at most.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parametric uncertainty quantification of sound insulation values
    Reynders, Edwin
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 135 (04): : 1907 - 1918
  • [32] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF PARAMETRIC ROLL
    Duz, Bulent
    Ypma, Egbert
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 37TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 7A, 2018,
  • [33] Parametric uncertainty quantification of sound insulation values
    Reynders, Edwin, 1907, Acoustical Society of America (135):
  • [34] ONLINE QUANTIFICATION OF INPUT UNCERTAINTY FOR PARAMETRIC MODELS
    Zhou, Enlu
    Liu, Tianyi
    2018 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2018, : 1587 - 1598
  • [35] QUANTIFICATION OF PARAMETRIC UNCERTAINTY VIA AN INTERVAL MODEL
    LEW, JS
    KEEL, LH
    JUANG, JN
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1994, 17 (06) : 1212 - 1218
  • [36] Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification on Point Defect Kinetics Equations with Perturbation Analysis
    Jin, Miaomiao
    Miao, Jilang
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [37] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a PWR LOCA sequence using parametric and non-parametric methods
    Zugazagoitia, Eneko
    Queral, Cesar
    Fernandez-Cosials, Kevin
    Gomez, Javier
    Felipe Duran, Luis
    Sanchez-Torrijos, Jorge
    Maria Posada, Jose
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 193
  • [38] Multifidelity uncertainty quantification for ice sheet simulations
    Aretz, Nicole
    Gunzburger, Max
    Morlighem, Mathieu
    Willcox, Karen
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [39] Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis on the aerodynamic performance of a micro transonic compressor
    Cheng, Hongzhi
    Zhou, Chuangxin
    Li, Ziliang
    Lu, Xingen
    Zhao, Shengfeng
    Zhu, Junqiang
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 141
  • [40] Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an unsteady axisymmetric reacting solid particle
    Hassan, A.
    Schumacher, L.
    Sabry, M.
    Le Chenadec, V.
    Sayadi, T.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2024, 262