Parametric Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Ice Giant Aerocapture Aerothermodynamics

被引:0
|
作者
Rataczak, Jens A. [1 ]
Boyd, Kin D. [1 ]
McMahon, Jay W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Aerosp Engn Sci, Boulder, CO 80302 USA
来源
AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024 | 2024年
关键词
RADIATIVE HEATING PREDICTIONS; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; SATURN; URANUS; ENTRY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Accurate characterization of the aerothermodynamic environment for Ice Giant aerocapture is necessary for thermal protection system design and overall mission reliability. However, uncertainties in the models used to simulate these flows produce substantial variations in the predicted aerothermodynamic quantities of interest, particularly the radiative heating. There is speculation over the effect of freestream methane on the aerothermal environments, and the amount of methane present in Ice Giant atmospheres is not well known. As such, this work presents a sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification of the convective and radiative heating distributions, and aerodynamics of an entry vehicle along an Ice Giant aerocapture trajectory. Sources of uncertainty include chemical reaction rates, transport properties, vibrational-relaxation rates, and the freestream methane concentration. A non-intrusive, pointcollocated polynomial chaos expansion technique is employed to compute Sobol indices and estimate epistemic uncertainty bounds of the aerothermal quantities of interest. The convective heating is most sensitive to transport properties and the rate of the hydrogen electron-impact ionization (EII) reaction. The stagnation region is dominated by dissociation/ionization phenomena, while the shoulder region is dominated by recombination. Overall uncertainty in the convective-heating distributions ranges from 4.40 to 11.7%. Radiative-heating uncertainty is much larger, with upper bounds exceeding 160% of the nominal predictions. A slight sensitivity of the radiative heating to the freestream methane concentration is observed, but the majority of the uncertainty at the stagnation point and along the frustum is attributed to the dissociation of H-2 with partner H. At lower altitudes, the radiative heating at the shoulder of the vehicle is highly sensitive to the reverse direction of the EII reaction rate due to its impact on the electronic state population of H. This behavior decreases as the altitude increases due to decreased levels of ionization. Aerodynamic coefficients are relatively insensitive to the CFD input parameters, with uncertainties of a few percent at most.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity Analysis and Parametric Uncertainty Quantification of a Modular Multilevel Converter
    Rashidi, Niloofar
    Burgos, Rolando
    Roy, Chris
    Boroyevich, Dushan
    JOURNAL OF VERIFICATION, VALIDATION AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2022, 7 (03):
  • [2] Uncertainty quantification and parametric sensitivity analysis of hydroelectric generating unit shafting
    Yan D.
    Zheng Y.
    Liu W.
    Chen Q.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41 (09): : 18 - 25
  • [3] Functional perspective of uncertainty quantification for stochastic parametric systems and global sensitivity analysis
    Wan Z.
    Chen J.
    Beer M.
    Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53 (03): : 837 - 854
  • [4] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of the Los Alamos sea ice model
    Urrego-Blanco, Jorge R.
    Urban, Nathan M.
    Hunke, Elizabeth C.
    Turner, Adrian K.
    Jeffery, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2016, 121 (04) : 2709 - 2732
  • [5] Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Transonic Aerodynamics with Geometric Uncertainty
    Wu, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Song, Shufang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017 : 1 - 16
  • [6] Special Issue: Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification
    Serban, Radu
    Wang, Yan
    Choi, Kyung K.
    Jayakumar, Paramsothy
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [7] EXTENDED FORWARD SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Zhao, Haihua
    Mousseau, Vincent A.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 181 (01) : 184 - 195
  • [8] Non-parametric correlative uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis: Application to a Langmuir bimolecular adsorption model
    Feng, Jinchao
    Lansford, Joshua
    Mironenko, Alexander
    Pourkargar, Davood Babaei
    Vlachos, Dionisios G.
    Katsoulakis, Markos A.
    AIP ADVANCES, 2018, 8 (03)
  • [9] Uncertainty Quantification of Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis in the Presence of Parametric Uncertainty
    Hu, Zhen
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    Du, Xiaoping
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 2 (03):
  • [10] Uncertainty Sensitivity Analysis for Reliability Problems with Parametric Distributions
    He, Jingjing
    Guan, Xuefei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2017, 66 (03) : 712 - 721