Comparative study between intrathecal fentanyl and Dorsal penile nerve block for controlling postoperative pain after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Elatreisy, Adel [1 ,2 ]
Ahmed, Yasser [1 ]
Elgarhy, Ahmed [3 ]
Hindawy, Mohamed [1 ]
Abouelgreed, Tamer [1 ]
Ahmed, Ismail [3 ]
Abdalla, Abdalla [3 ]
Ramadan, Hany [3 ]
Aboelsuod, Mohamed [3 ]
Shrief, Khaled [3 ]
Mohamed, Ayman [3 ]
Ibrahim, Wael [3 ]
Abdelhameed, Saeed [3 ]
Alghamdi, Mohammad [2 ]
Alzahrani, Mohammed [2 ]
Youssof, Hamada [4 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] King Fahd Armed Forces Hosp, Urol Dept, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Anesthesia Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Fayoum Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, Faiyum, Egypt
关键词
Penile prosthesis; Penile block; Intrathecal fentanyl; Postoperative pain;
D O I
10.4081/aiua.2024.12951
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP).<br /> Patients and methods: A prospective single-center study included 80 patients amenable to IPP. Patients were divided equally into two groups. Group I included 40 patients who were managed with spinal anesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl before undergoing IPP. Group II comprised 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia with dorsal penile block before IPP. Study groups were compared regarding postoperative VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores, total narcotics consumption, patient satisfaction levels, and perioperative complications.<br /> Results: The study groups were comparable regarding baseline patients' criteria. The operative time was comparable between the study groups, with group I and group II having respective median times of 64 minutes (interquartile range: 55-78) and 67 minutes (interquartile range: 56-81) (p = 0.65). Additionally, both groups demonstrated similar distributions in IPP implant cylinder and reservoir size (p = 0.9). Postoperative pain was higher in group I, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Eight patients in group I (20%) called the physician's office asking for pain medication, compared to two patients in group II (5%) (p = 0.04). 85% of patients in group II were highly satisfied compared to 50 % in group I (p = 0.003). We reported a 5% complication rate in group I compared to 2.5% in group II (p = 0.6).<br /> Conclusions: The present study found that the dorsal penile nerve block offers superior postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction compared to intrathecal fentanyl for patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis insertion.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simultaneous implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis and bone anchored bulbourethral sling after radical prostatectomy
    Pinto, R.
    Guimaraes, M.
    Oliveira, R.
    Silva, A.
    Cruz, F.
    Dinis, P.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 : 129 - 130
  • [42] Patient's satisfaction after 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: An Italian multicentric study
    Gentile, Giorgio
    Franceschelli, Alessandro
    Massenio, Paolo
    Tuccio, Agostino
    Cocci, Andrea
    Divenuto, Lucia
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Natali, Alessandro
    Vitarelli, Antonio
    Cormio, Luigi
    Colombo, Fulvio
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2016, 88 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [43] Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation after gender affirming phalloplasty with radial forearm free flap
    Ervin Kocjancic
    Jorge H. Jaunarena
    Loren Schechter
    Ömer Acar
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2020, 32 : 99 - 106
  • [44] Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation after gender affirming phalloplasty with radial forearm free flap
    Kocjancic, Ervin
    Jaunarena, Jorge H.
    Schechter, Loren
    Acar, Omer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [45] Cylinder rerouting for lateral extrusion after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation - Surgical technique revision
    Pinto Pe Leve, Paulo Jorge
    Cardoso Felicio, Joao Pedro
    de Oliveira, Pedro Simoes
    Palma dos Reis, Jose Manuel
    Estrocio Martins, Francisco Alves
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2020, 92 (03) : 271 - 272
  • [46] Favorable Female Sexual Function is Associated with Patient Satisfaction after Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
    Moskovic, Daniel J.
    Gittens, Paul
    Avila, Desiderio, Jr.
    Chandrashekar, Aravind
    Khera, Mohit
    Lipshultz, Larry I.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (07): : 1996 - 2001
  • [47] Relationships between erectile dysfunction, prostate cancer treatment type and inflatable penile prosthesis implantation
    Shen, Chan
    Jain, Kunj
    Shah, Tejash
    Schaefer, Eric
    Zhou, Shouhao
    Fried, Dennis
    Helmer, Drew A.
    Sadeghi-Nejad, Hossein
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2022, 63 (03) : 316 - 324
  • [48] ANATOMIC TRANSPERINEAL PUDENDAL NERVE BLOCK BEFORE PENILE PROSTHESIS PLACEMENT TO REDUCE IMMEDIATE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN - DESCRIPTION AND OUTCOMES
    Lewis, Kieran
    Bole, Raevti
    Booher, Jacquelyn
    Deangelo, Lydia
    Fuller, Gwendolyn
    Roberts, Ly Hoang
    Bajic, Petar
    Lundy, Scott
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E1001 - E1002
  • [49] Factors associated with postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis: a single center experience
    Drevik, Johnathan
    Lucas, Jacob
    Gupta, Shishir
    Simhan, Jay
    Cohn, Joshua
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S189 - S190
  • [50] DRAINED VERSUS NON-DRAINED INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION: A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Ragheb, A.
    Romero Otero, J.
    Bettocchi, C.
    Osmonov, D.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (06): : S138 - S138