Comparative study between intrathecal fentanyl and Dorsal penile nerve block for controlling postoperative pain after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Elatreisy, Adel [1 ,2 ]
Ahmed, Yasser [1 ]
Elgarhy, Ahmed [3 ]
Hindawy, Mohamed [1 ]
Abouelgreed, Tamer [1 ]
Ahmed, Ismail [3 ]
Abdalla, Abdalla [3 ]
Ramadan, Hany [3 ]
Aboelsuod, Mohamed [3 ]
Shrief, Khaled [3 ]
Mohamed, Ayman [3 ]
Ibrahim, Wael [3 ]
Abdelhameed, Saeed [3 ]
Alghamdi, Mohammad [2 ]
Alzahrani, Mohammed [2 ]
Youssof, Hamada [4 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] King Fahd Armed Forces Hosp, Urol Dept, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Anesthesia Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Fayoum Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, Faiyum, Egypt
关键词
Penile prosthesis; Penile block; Intrathecal fentanyl; Postoperative pain;
D O I
10.4081/aiua.2024.12951
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP).<br /> Patients and methods: A prospective single-center study included 80 patients amenable to IPP. Patients were divided equally into two groups. Group I included 40 patients who were managed with spinal anesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl before undergoing IPP. Group II comprised 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia with dorsal penile block before IPP. Study groups were compared regarding postoperative VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores, total narcotics consumption, patient satisfaction levels, and perioperative complications.<br /> Results: The study groups were comparable regarding baseline patients' criteria. The operative time was comparable between the study groups, with group I and group II having respective median times of 64 minutes (interquartile range: 55-78) and 67 minutes (interquartile range: 56-81) (p = 0.65). Additionally, both groups demonstrated similar distributions in IPP implant cylinder and reservoir size (p = 0.9). Postoperative pain was higher in group I, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Eight patients in group I (20%) called the physician's office asking for pain medication, compared to two patients in group II (5%) (p = 0.04). 85% of patients in group II were highly satisfied compared to 50 % in group I (p = 0.003). We reported a 5% complication rate in group I compared to 2.5% in group II (p = 0.6).<br /> Conclusions: The present study found that the dorsal penile nerve block offers superior postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction compared to intrathecal fentanyl for patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis insertion.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors Impacting Postoperative Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Ehlers, Mark E.
    Mohan, Charan S.
    Akerman, Jason P.
    McGowan, Micah
    McCormick, Benjamin J.
    Hacker, Kathryn E.
    Coward, R. Matthew
    Figler, Bradley D.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (11): : 1915 - 1920
  • [32] AN OVERVIEW ON PAIN AFTER INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A SINGLE-CENTER PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Ceruti, C.
    Falcone, M.
    Bertolino, L.
    Sedigh, O.
    Timpano, M.
    Preto, M.
    Sibona, M.
    Rolle, L.
    Gontero, P.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (05): : S21 - S21
  • [33] A Case of Chronic Penile Pain Successfully Treated With Dorsal Nerve Block
    Watson, David D.
    Zhu, Xiaoying
    A & A PRACTICE, 2023, 17 (08) : E01714
  • [34] Re: Life Quality Change After Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Bakircioglu, Emre
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2018, 5 (03): : 218 - 218
  • [35] Severe Vascular Complication after Implantation of a Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Deho', Federico
    Henry, Gerard D.
    Marone, Enrico M.
    Sacca', Antonino
    Chiesa, Roberto
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (12): : 2956 - 2959
  • [36] Self and partner satisfaction rates after 3 part inflatable penile prosthesis implantation
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Kucuktopcu, Onur
    Ozgor, Faruk
    Ozkuvanci, Unsal
    Baykal, Murat
    Sarilar, Omer
    Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2014, 86 (03) : 219 - 221
  • [37] Dorsal vein rupture after practice of taqaandan, necrotising cavernositis, penile reconstruction, urethroplasty and penile prosthesis implantation
    Faydaci, G.
    Ozgul, A.
    Kuyumcuoglu, U.
    Aktoz, T.
    Oder, M.
    ANDROLOGIA, 2012, 44 : 851 - 855
  • [38] Comparing Complication Rates and Continence Control in Concurrent Dual Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis/Artificial Urinary Sphincter vs. Inflatable Penile Prosthesis/Male Sling: An Updated Comparative Pilot Study
    Alla, K. Khalaf
    Mahdi, M.
    Mehr, J.
    Westney, O. L.
    Wang, R.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [39] Re: Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation into Scarred Corporal Bodies: Timing May Decrease Postoperative Problems
    Elliott, Sean P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (03): : 923 - 923
  • [40] VACUUM PREPARATION, OPTIMIZATION OF CYLINDER LENGTH AND POSTOPERATIVE DAILY INFLATION REDUCES COMPLAINTS OF SHORTENED PENILE LENGTH FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    Sellers, Tom
    Dineen, Martin
    Salem, Emad
    Wilson, Steven
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E687 - E688