Fair Ride Allocation on a Line

被引:0
|
作者
Amano, Yuki [1 ]
Igarashi, Ayumi [2 ]
Kawase, Yasushi [2 ]
Makino, Kazuhisa [3 ]
Ono, Hirotaka [4 ]
机构
[1] Chuo Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Korakuen Campus,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Nagoya Univ, Nagoya, Japan
关键词
Phrases; Fair allocation; coalition formation game; Shapley value; Potential game;
D O I
10.1145/3708491
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The airport problem is a classical and well-known model of fair cost-sharing for a single facility among multiple agents. This article extends it to a more general setting involving multiple facilities. Specifically, in our model, each agent selects a facility and shares the cost with the other agents using the same facility. This scenario frequently occurs in sharing economies, such as sharing subscription costs for a multi-user license or taxi fares among customers traveling to potentially different destinations along a route. Our model can be viewed as a coalition formation game with size constraints, based on the fair cost-sharing of the airport problem. We refer to our model as a fair ride allocation on a line. We incorporate Nash stability and envy-freeness as criteria for solution concepts in our setting. We show that if a feasible allocation exists, a Nash stable feasible allocation that minimizes the social cost of agents exists and can be computed efficiently. Regarding envy-freeness, we provide several structural properties of envy-free allocations. Based on these properties, we design efficient algorithms for finding an envy-free allocation when either (1) the number of facilities, (2) the number of agent types, or (3) the capacity of facilities, is small. Moreover, we show that a consecutive envy-free allocation can be computed in polynomial time. On the negative front, we show NP-completeness of determining the existence of an allocation under two relaxed envy-free concepts.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Distributed fair allocation of indivisible goods
    Chevaleyre, Yann
    Endriss, Ulle
    Maudet, Nicolas
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 242 : 1 - 22
  • [42] Fair Allocation Methods for Coalition Games
    Housman, David
    COMMUNICATING MATHEMATICS, 2009, 479 : 127 - 155
  • [43] Fair Resource Allocation in a Volatile Marketplace
    Bateni, MohammadHossein
    Chen, Yiwei
    Ciocan, Dragos Florin
    Mirrokni, Vahab
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 70 (01) : 288 - 308
  • [44] Is donor aid allocation to Iraq fair?
    Singh, JA
    LANCET, 2003, 362 (9396): : 1672 - 1673
  • [45] Fair resource allocation over time
    Bampis, Evripidis
    Escoffier, Bruno
    Mladenovic, Sasa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS (AAMAS' 18), 2018, : 766 - 773
  • [46] A FAIR ALLOCATION OF COUNTY CRICKET OPPONENTS
    WRIGHT, M
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1992, 43 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [47] Fair estimation of capital risk allocation
    Bielecki, Tomasz R.
    Cialenco, Igor
    Pitera, Marcin
    Schmidt, Thorsten
    STATISTICS & RISK MODELING, 2020, 37 (1-2) : 1 - 24
  • [48] Fair Resource Allocation for Heterogeneous Tasks
    Mukherjee, Koyel
    Dutta, Partha
    Raravi, Gurulingesh
    Rajasubramaniam, Thangaraj
    Dasgupta, Koustuv
    Singh, Atul
    2015 IEEE 29TH INTERNATIONAL PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM (IPDPS), 2015, : 1087 - 1096
  • [49] Fair allocation of a multiset of indivisible items
    Gorantla, Pranay
    Marwaha, Kunal
    Velusamy, Santhoshini
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, SODA, 2023, : 304 - 331
  • [50] Repeated Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items
    Igarashi, Ayumi
    Lackner, Martin
    Nardi, Oliviero
    Novaro, Arianna
    THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 9, 2024, : 9781 - 9789