Fair Ride Allocation on a Line

被引:0
|
作者
Amano, Yuki [1 ]
Igarashi, Ayumi [2 ]
Kawase, Yasushi [2 ]
Makino, Kazuhisa [3 ]
Ono, Hirotaka [4 ]
机构
[1] Chuo Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Korakuen Campus,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Nagoya Univ, Nagoya, Japan
关键词
Phrases; Fair allocation; coalition formation game; Shapley value; Potential game;
D O I
10.1145/3708491
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The airport problem is a classical and well-known model of fair cost-sharing for a single facility among multiple agents. This article extends it to a more general setting involving multiple facilities. Specifically, in our model, each agent selects a facility and shares the cost with the other agents using the same facility. This scenario frequently occurs in sharing economies, such as sharing subscription costs for a multi-user license or taxi fares among customers traveling to potentially different destinations along a route. Our model can be viewed as a coalition formation game with size constraints, based on the fair cost-sharing of the airport problem. We refer to our model as a fair ride allocation on a line. We incorporate Nash stability and envy-freeness as criteria for solution concepts in our setting. We show that if a feasible allocation exists, a Nash stable feasible allocation that minimizes the social cost of agents exists and can be computed efficiently. Regarding envy-freeness, we provide several structural properties of envy-free allocations. Based on these properties, we design efficient algorithms for finding an envy-free allocation when either (1) the number of facilities, (2) the number of agent types, or (3) the capacity of facilities, is small. Moreover, we show that a consecutive envy-free allocation can be computed in polynomial time. On the negative front, we show NP-completeness of determining the existence of an allocation under two relaxed envy-free concepts.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A Survey on Fair Allocation of Chores
    Guo, Hao
    Li, Weidong
    Deng, Bin
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (16)
  • [12] Is fair allocation always inefficient
    Tang, A
    Wang, JT
    Low, SH
    IEEE INFOCOM 2004: THE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 35 - 45
  • [13] Fair Allocation with Diminishing Differences
    Segal-Halevi, Erel
    Hassidim, Avinatan
    Aziz, Haris
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 67 : 471 - 507
  • [14] Fair allocation with diminishing differences
    Segal-Halevi E.
    Hassidim A.
    Aziz H.
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2020, 67 : 471 - 507
  • [15] Fair buffer allocation scheme
    Telecom Finland, Tampere, Finland
    Comput Commun, 3 (220-226):
  • [16] Fair allocation of capital growth
    Ortmann, Karl Michael
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (02) : 181 - 196
  • [17] Fair task allocation in transportation
    Ye, Qing Chuan
    Zhang, Yingqian
    Dekker, Rommert
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 68 : 1 - 16
  • [18] Fair task allocation problem
    Billing, Christian
    Jaehn, Florian
    Wensing, Thomas
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 284 (01) : 131 - 146
  • [19] On the complexity of fair house allocation
    Kamiyama, Naoyuki
    Manurangsi, Pasin
    Suksompong, Warut
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 49 (04) : 572 - 577
  • [20] Fair Allocation with Special Externalities
    Mishra, Shaily
    Padala, Manisha
    Gujar, Sujit
    PRICAI 2022: TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PT I, 2022, 13629 : 3 - 16