Evaluation of the prostate cancer and its metastases in the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT images: deep learning method vs. conventional PET/CT processing

被引:0
|
作者
Giv, Masoumeh Dorri [1 ]
Arabi, Hossein [2 ]
Naseri, Shahrokh [3 ]
Firouzabad, Leila Alipour [4 ]
Aghaei, Atena [1 ]
Askari, Emran [1 ]
Raeisi, Nasrin [1 ]
Tanha, Amin Saber [1 ]
Golestani, Zahra Bakhshi [1 ]
Kakhki, Amir Hossein Dabbagh [5 ]
Kakhki, Vahid Reza Dabbagh [1 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Ghaem Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Nucl Med Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Med Informat, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Med Phys, Mashhad, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Radiat Biol Res Ctr, Dept Radit Technol, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
prostate cancer; lymph node; deep learning; PET/CT images; 68-Ga-PSMA; Ga-68]Ga-PSMA; ATTENUATION CORRECTION; RADIOLIGAND THERAPY; PSMA; GENERATION; GUIDELINES; LESIONS; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000001891
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This study demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of using a deep learning-based approach for attenuation correction in [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA PET scans. Methods A dataset of 700 prostate cancer patients (mean age: 67.6 +/- 5.9 years, range: 45-85 years) who underwent [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA PET/computed tomography was collected. A deep learning model was trained to perform attenuation correction on these images. Quantitative accuracy was assessed using clinical data from 92 patients, comparing the deep learning-based attenuation correction (DLAC) to computed tomography-based PET attenuation correction (PET-CTAC) using mean error, mean absolute error, and root mean square error based on standard uptake value. Clinical evaluation was conducted by three specialists who performed a blinded assessment of lesion detectability and overall image quality in a subset of 50 subjects, comparing DLAC and PET-CTAC images. Results The DLAC model yielded mean error, mean absolute error, and root mean square error values of -0.007 +/- 0.032, 0.08 +/- 0.033, and 0.252 +/- 125 standard uptake value, respectively. Regarding lesion detection and image quality, DLAC showed superior performance in 16 of the 50 cases, while in 56% of the cases, the images generated by DLAC and PET-CTAC were found to have closely comparable quality and lesion detectability. Conclusion This study highlights significant improvements in image quality and lesion detection capabilities through the integration of DLAC in [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA PET imaging. This innovative approach not only addresses challenges such as bladder radioactivity but also represents a promising method to minimize patient radiation exposure by integrating low-dose computed tomography and DLAC, ultimately improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 983
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncommon Penio-Scrotal Metastases of Prostate Cancer Detected on 68Ga PSMA PET/CT
    Seniaray, Nikhil
    Verma, Ritu
    Khanna, Sudhir
    Belho, Ethel
    Malik, Dharmender
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (05) : 424 - 425
  • [22] 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for the evaluation of liver metastases in patients with prostate cancer
    Damjanovic, Jonathan
    Janssen, Jan-Carlo
    Prasad, Vikas
    Diederichs, Gerd
    Walter, Thula
    Brenner, Winfried
    Makowski, Marcus R.
    CANCER IMAGING, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [23] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in prostate cancer
    Sachpekidis, C.
    Baeumer, P.
    Hadaschik, B. A.
    Haberkorn, U.
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 : S402 - S403
  • [24] 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for the evaluation of liver metastases in patients with prostate cancer
    Jonathan Damjanovic
    Jan-Carlo Janssen
    Vikas Prasad
    Gerd Diederichs
    Thula Walter
    Winfried Brenner
    Marcus R. Makowski
    Cancer Imaging, 19
  • [25] A potential pitfall in 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Anthracosis
    Elri, T.
    Aras, M.
    Salihoglu, Y. S.
    Erdemir, R. U.
    Cabuk, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 : S436 - S437
  • [26] Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer
    Hellwig, D.
    Moosbauer, J.
    Eilles, C.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2014, 45 (06) : 457 - 463
  • [27] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer
    Garcia Garzon, J. R.
    de Arcocha Torres, M.
    Delgado-Bolton, R.
    Ceci, F.
    Alvarez Ruiz, S.
    Orcajo Rincon, J.
    Caresia Aroztegui, A. P.
    Garcia Velloso, M. J.
    Garcia Vicente, A. M.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2018, 37 (02): : 130 - 138
  • [28] SUVmax Assessment in 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT Scan
    Fallahpoor, M.
    Vahidfar, N.
    Kalantari, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E137 - E137
  • [29] Intraindividual comparison of [68Ga]GaRM2 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with mCRPC in a theranostic setting
    Kurth, Jens
    Krause, Bernd
    Joksch, Markus
    Hakenberg, Oliver
    Schwarzenboeck, Sarah
    Heuschkel, Martin
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 64
  • [30] Incorporating the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT PRIMARY score into the selection criteria for prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance
    Kabasakal, Levent
    Turkay, Rustu
    Onal, Bulent
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2024, 51 (05) : 1464 - 1466