Single-Center Experience With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for Diagnosing Lymphatic Disorders and Guiding Percutaneous Embolization

被引:0
|
作者
Ahn, Yura [1 ,2 ]
Koo, Hyun Jung [1 ,2 ]
Choe, Jooae [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Hee Ho [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Dong Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Joon-Won [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Ji Hoon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Res, 88 Olymp Ro,43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro,43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Lymphangiography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Chylothorax; Thoracic Duct; CHYLOTHORAX; ASCITES;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e260
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The pragmatic role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) needs to be evaluated and compared across distinct lymphatic disorders. We aimed to evaluate the performance of DCMRL for identifying the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders and to define the potential benefit of DCMRL for planning lymphatic interventions. Methods: Patients who underwent DCMRL between August 2017 and July 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. DCMRL was performed with intranodal injection of a gadolinium-based contrast medium through inguinal lymph nodes under local anesthesia. Technical success of DCMRL and feasibility of percutaneous embolization were assessed based on the lymphatic anatomy visualized by DCMRL. Based on the underlying causes, clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results: Seventy consecutive patients were included. The indications were traumatic chylothorax (n = 42), traumatic chylous ascites (n = 11), and nontraumatic lymphatic leak (n = 17). The technical success rate of DCMRL was the highest in association with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders (94.1% [16/17]), followed by traumatic chylothorax (92.9% [39/42]) and traumatic chylous ascites (81.8% [9/11]). Thirty-one (47.7%) patients among 65 patients who underwent technically successful DCMRL had feasible anatomy for intervention. Clinical success was achieved in 90.3% (28/31) of patients with feasible anatomy for radiologic intervention, while 62.5% (10/16) of patients with anatomical challenges showed improvement. Most patients with traumatic chylothorax showed improvement (92.9% [39/42]), whereas only 23.5% (4/17) of patients with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders showed clinical improvement. Conclusion: DCMRL can help identify the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders. The performance of DCMRL and clinical outcomes vary based on the underlying cause. The feasibility of lymphatic intervention can be determined using DCMRL, which can help in predicting clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker
    Hylton, Nola
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (20) : 3293 - 3298
  • [42] Information Criteria for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Shinohara, Russell T.
    Crainiceanu, Ciprian S.
    Caffo, Brian S.
    Reich, Daniel S.
    2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PATTERN RECOGNITION IN NEUROIMAGING (PRNI 2013), 2013, : 37 - 41
  • [43] Dynamic Contrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography Localizes Lymphatic Leak to the Duodenum in Protein-Losing Enteropathy
    Brownell, Jefferson N.
    Biko, David M.
    Mamula, Petar
    Krishnamurthy, Ganesh
    Escobar, Fernando
    Srinivasan, Abhay
    Laje, Pablo
    Piccoli, David A.
    Pinto, Erin
    Smith, Christopher L.
    Dori, Yoav
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2022, 74 (01): : 38 - 45
  • [44] Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging findings that affect the magnetic resonance-directed ultrasound correlation of non-mass enhancement lesions: a single-center retrospective study
    Bilge, Almila Coskun
    Demir, Pinar Ilhan
    Aydin, Hale
    Bostanci, Isil Esen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1132):
  • [45] Anatomic and functional evaluation of the lymphatics and lymph nodes in diagnosis of lymphatic circulation disorders with contrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography
    Liu, Ning-Fei
    Lu, Qing
    Jiang, Zhao-Hua
    Wang, Chen-Guang
    Zhou, Jian-Guo
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (04) : 980 - 987
  • [46] Breast Cancer Surrogate Subtype Classification Using Pretreatment Multi-Phase Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Kovacevic, Lucija
    Stajduhar, Andrija
    Stemberger, Karlo
    Korsa, Lea
    Marusic, Zlatko
    Prutki, Maja
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [47] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a model of splenic metastasis
    Runge, VM
    Williams, NM
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [48] Maximum Entropy Approach in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Farsani, Zahra Amini
    Schmid, Volker J.
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2017, 56 (06) : 461 - 468
  • [49] Fast magnetic resonance fingerprinting for dynamic contrast-enhanced studies in mice
    Gu, Yuning
    Wang, Charlie Y.
    Anderson, Christian E.
    Liu, Yuchi
    Hu, He
    Johansen, Mette L.
    Ma, Dan
    Jiang, Yun
    Ramos-Estebanez, Ciro
    Brady-Kalnay, Susann
    Griswold, Mark A.
    Flask, Chris A.
    Yu, Xin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (06) : 2681 - 2690
  • [50] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images of the kidney - A processing study
    Lv, Dongjiao
    Zhuang, Jie
    Chen, Huijun
    Wang, Jing
    Xu, Yufeng
    Yang, Xuedong
    Zhang, Jue
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Fang, Jing
    IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2008, 27 (05): : 36 - 41