Single-Center Experience With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for Diagnosing Lymphatic Disorders and Guiding Percutaneous Embolization

被引:0
|
作者
Ahn, Yura [1 ,2 ]
Koo, Hyun Jung [1 ,2 ]
Choe, Jooae [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Hee Ho [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Dong Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Joon-Won [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Ji Hoon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Res, 88 Olymp Ro,43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro,43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Lymphangiography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Chylothorax; Thoracic Duct; CHYLOTHORAX; ASCITES;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e260
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The pragmatic role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) needs to be evaluated and compared across distinct lymphatic disorders. We aimed to evaluate the performance of DCMRL for identifying the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders and to define the potential benefit of DCMRL for planning lymphatic interventions. Methods: Patients who underwent DCMRL between August 2017 and July 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. DCMRL was performed with intranodal injection of a gadolinium-based contrast medium through inguinal lymph nodes under local anesthesia. Technical success of DCMRL and feasibility of percutaneous embolization were assessed based on the lymphatic anatomy visualized by DCMRL. Based on the underlying causes, clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results: Seventy consecutive patients were included. The indications were traumatic chylothorax (n = 42), traumatic chylous ascites (n = 11), and nontraumatic lymphatic leak (n = 17). The technical success rate of DCMRL was the highest in association with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders (94.1% [16/17]), followed by traumatic chylothorax (92.9% [39/42]) and traumatic chylous ascites (81.8% [9/11]). Thirty-one (47.7%) patients among 65 patients who underwent technically successful DCMRL had feasible anatomy for intervention. Clinical success was achieved in 90.3% (28/31) of patients with feasible anatomy for radiologic intervention, while 62.5% (10/16) of patients with anatomical challenges showed improvement. Most patients with traumatic chylothorax showed improvement (92.9% [39/42]), whereas only 23.5% (4/17) of patients with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders showed clinical improvement. Conclusion: DCMRL can help identify the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders. The performance of DCMRL and clinical outcomes vary based on the underlying cause. The feasibility of lymphatic intervention can be determined using DCMRL, which can help in predicting clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single-center study: dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnostic assessment of carotid body tumors
    Schwarze, Vincent
    Marschner, Constantin
    De Figueiredo, Giovanna Negrao
    Ingrisch, Michael
    Ruebenthaler, Johannes
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 10 (09) : 1739 - 1747
  • [32] Utility of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography for yellow nail syndrome with lymphangiopathy: a case report
    Shimanuki, Yui
    Miyoshi, Shion
    Anzai, Nanami
    Usui, Yusuke
    Shiraga, Nobuyuki
    Kishi, Kazuma
    OXFORD MEDICAL CASE REPORTS, 2022, 2022 (07): : 278 - 280
  • [33] Imaging of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Cattaneo, Mattia
    Sun, Jie
    Staub, Daniel
    Xu, Dongxiang
    Gallino, Jeanne Marie
    Santini, Paolo
    Porretta, Alessandra P.
    Yuan, Chun
    Balu, Niranjan
    Arnold, Marcel
    Froio, Alberto
    Limoni, Costanzo
    Wyttenbach, Rolf
    Gallino, Augusto
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 48 (3-6) : 140 - 148
  • [34] Carotid plaque neovascularization - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance blinded comparison
    Cattaneo, M.
    Sun, J.
    Staub, D.
    Xu, D.
    Gallino, J. M.
    Santini, P.
    Porretta, A. P.
    Yuan, C.
    Niranjan, B.
    Arnold, M.
    Limoni, C.
    Gallino, A.
    Cattaneo, M.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 43
  • [35] Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the rat kidney
    Fransen, R
    Muller, HJ
    Boer, WH
    Nicolay, K
    Koomans, HA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1996, 7 (03): : 424 - 430
  • [36] Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance nephrography in healthy dogs
    Fonseca-Matheus, J. M.
    Perez-Garcia, C. C.
    Ginja, M. M. D.
    Altonaga, J. R.
    Orden, M. A.
    Gonzalo-Orden, J. M.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 189 (03): : 341 - 345
  • [37] Vascularity and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Frankhouser, David E.
    Dietze, Eric
    Mahabal, Ashish
    Seewaldt, Victoria L.
    FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 1
  • [38] Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Applications in Oncology
    Teo, Q. Q.
    Thng, C. H.
    Koh, T. S.
    Ng, Q. S. p
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (10) : E9 - E20
  • [39] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the sarcopenic muscle
    Nicolato E.
    Farace P.
    Asperio R.M.
    Marzola P.
    Lunati E.
    Sbarbati A.
    Osculati F.
    BMC Medical Imaging, 2 (1)
  • [40] Parameter Selection in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Tomography
    Niinimaki, Kati
    Hanhela, M.
    Kolehmainen, V.
    MATHEMATICAL AND NUMERICAL APPROACHES FOR MULTI-WAVE INVERSE PROBLEMS, CIRM, 2020, 328 : 73 - 89