Spectral expansion methods for prediction uncertainty quantification in systems biology

被引:0
|
作者
Deneer, Anna [1 ]
Molenaar, Jaap [1 ]
Fleck, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Math & Stat Methods Grp Biometris, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg Ctr Data Anal & Modeling, Freiburg, Germany
来源
关键词
systems biology; computational systems biology; mathematical modelling; spectral expansion; surrogate models; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY INDEXES; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; ARABIDOPSIS TRICHOME; GENE-EXPRESSION; MODEL; NOISE;
D O I
10.3389/fsysb.2024.1419809
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Uncertainty is ubiquitous in biological systems. For example, since gene expression is intrinsically governed by noise, nature shows a fascinating degree of variability. If we want to use a model to predict the behaviour of such an intrinsically stochastic system, we have to cope with the fact that the model parameters are never exactly known, but vary according to some distribution. A key question is then to determine how the uncertainties in the parameters affect the model outcome. Knowing the latter uncertainties is crucial when a model is used for, e.g., experimental design, optimisation, or decision-making. To establish how parameter and model prediction uncertainties are related, Monte Carlo approaches could be used. Then, the model is evaluated for a huge number of parameters sets, drawn from the multivariate parameter distribution. However, when model solutions are computationally expensive this approach is intractable. To overcome this problem, so-called spectral expansion (SE) methods have been developed to quantify prediction uncertainty within a probabilistic framework. Such SE methods have a basis in, e.g., computational mathematics, engineering, physics, and fluid dynamics, and, to a lesser extent, systems biology. The computational costs of SE schemes mainly stem from the calculation of the expansion coefficients. Furthermore, SE effectively leads to a surrogate model which captures the dependence of the model on the uncertainty parameters, but is much simpler to execute compared to the original model. In this paper, we present an innovative scheme for the calculation of the expansion coefficients. It guarantees that the model has to be evaluated only a restricted number of times. Especially for models of high complexity this may be a huge computational advantage. By applying the scheme to a variety of examples we show its power, especially in challenging situations where solutions slowly converge due to high computational costs, bifurcations, and discontinuities.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uncertainty Quantification in Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using First-Order Reliability Methods
    Sankararaman, Shankar
    Daigle, Matthew J.
    Goebel, Kai
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2014, 63 (02) : 603 - 619
  • [42] Probabilistic and machine learning methods for uncertainty quantification in power outage prediction due to extreme events
    Arora, Prateek
    Ceferino, Luis
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2023, 23 (05) : 1665 - 1683
  • [43] A Spectral Approach to Uncertainty Quantification in Water Distribution Networks
    Braun, Mathias
    Piller, Olivier
    Iollo, Angelo
    Mortazavi, Iraj
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (03)
  • [44] COMPARISON OF LINEARIZATION AND GRAPH CLUSTERING METHODS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF LARGE SCALE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS
    Mukherjee, Arpan
    Rai, Rahul
    Singla, Puneet
    Singh, Tarunraj
    Patra, Abani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2017, 7 (01) : 23 - 56
  • [45] Uncertainty quantification in simulations of power systems: Multi-element polynomial chaos methods
    Prempraneerach, P.
    Hover, F. S.
    Triantafyllou, M. S.
    Karniadakis, G. E.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (06) : 632 - 646
  • [46] Uncertainty quantification for algebraic systems of equations
    Lopez, R. H.
    Fadel Miguel, L. F.
    de Cursi, J. E. Souza
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2013, 128 : 189 - 202
  • [47] Uncertainty quantification for systems of conservation laws
    Poette, Gael
    Despres, Bruno
    Lucor, Didier
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2009, 228 (07) : 2443 - 2467
  • [48] Uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations: A stochastic spectral approach
    Mathelin, L
    Hussaini, MY
    COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS 2002, 2003, : 65 - 70
  • [49] Uncertainty quantification in hybrid dynamical systems
    Sahai, Tuhin
    Pasini, Jose Miguel
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2013, 237 : 411 - 427
  • [50] Applying uncertainty quantification to complex systems
    Beran, Phil
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 2017, 55 (11) : 10 - 10