Spectral expansion methods for prediction uncertainty quantification in systems biology

被引:0
|
作者
Deneer, Anna [1 ]
Molenaar, Jaap [1 ]
Fleck, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Math & Stat Methods Grp Biometris, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg Ctr Data Anal & Modeling, Freiburg, Germany
来源
关键词
systems biology; computational systems biology; mathematical modelling; spectral expansion; surrogate models; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY INDEXES; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; ARABIDOPSIS TRICHOME; GENE-EXPRESSION; MODEL; NOISE;
D O I
10.3389/fsysb.2024.1419809
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Uncertainty is ubiquitous in biological systems. For example, since gene expression is intrinsically governed by noise, nature shows a fascinating degree of variability. If we want to use a model to predict the behaviour of such an intrinsically stochastic system, we have to cope with the fact that the model parameters are never exactly known, but vary according to some distribution. A key question is then to determine how the uncertainties in the parameters affect the model outcome. Knowing the latter uncertainties is crucial when a model is used for, e.g., experimental design, optimisation, or decision-making. To establish how parameter and model prediction uncertainties are related, Monte Carlo approaches could be used. Then, the model is evaluated for a huge number of parameters sets, drawn from the multivariate parameter distribution. However, when model solutions are computationally expensive this approach is intractable. To overcome this problem, so-called spectral expansion (SE) methods have been developed to quantify prediction uncertainty within a probabilistic framework. Such SE methods have a basis in, e.g., computational mathematics, engineering, physics, and fluid dynamics, and, to a lesser extent, systems biology. The computational costs of SE schemes mainly stem from the calculation of the expansion coefficients. Furthermore, SE effectively leads to a surrogate model which captures the dependence of the model on the uncertainty parameters, but is much simpler to execute compared to the original model. In this paper, we present an innovative scheme for the calculation of the expansion coefficients. It guarantees that the model has to be evaluated only a restricted number of times. Especially for models of high complexity this may be a huge computational advantage. By applying the scheme to a variety of examples we show its power, especially in challenging situations where solutions slowly converge due to high computational costs, bifurcations, and discontinuities.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty quantification of creep in concrete by Taylor expansion
    Criel, P.
    Reybrouck, N.
    Caspeele, R.
    Matthys, S.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 153 : 334 - 341
  • [22] Uncertainty Quantification in Computational and Prediction Science
    Ghanem, Roger G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 80 (6-7) : 671 - 672
  • [23] Uncertainty quantification in chemical systems
    Najm, H. N.
    Debusschere, B. J.
    Marzouk, Y. A.
    Widmer, S.
    Le Maitre, O. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 80 (6-7) : 789 - 814
  • [24] Conditional Gaussian Systems for Multiscale Nonlinear Stochastic Systems: Prediction, State Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification
    Chen, Nan
    Majda, Andrew J.
    ENTROPY, 2018, 20 (07)
  • [25] Bayesian Spectral Moment Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification
    Cao, Norman M.
    Sciortino, Francesco
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2020, 48 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [26] Uncertainty Quantification for Sparse Estimation of Spectral Lines
    Han, Yi
    Lee, Thomas C. M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 70 : 6243 - 6256
  • [27] Uncertainty quantification with spectral approximations of a flood model
    Liu, D. S.
    Matthies, H. G.
    9TH WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS AND 4TH ASIAN PACIFIC CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2010, 10
  • [28] Reduced Basis Methods for Uncertainty Quantification
    Chen, Peng
    Quarteroni, Alfio
    Rozza, Gianluigi
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2017, 5 (01): : 813 - 869
  • [29] Uncertainty quantification for multidisciplinary launch vehicle design using model order reduction and spectral methods
    Brevault, Loic
    Balesdent, Mathieu
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2021, 187 : 295 - 314
  • [30] Nonlinear Science and Network Methods for Prediction Problems in Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
    Wang, Jian-Xin
    Li, Min
    Yu, Zu-Guo
    CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 11 (02) : 154 - 155