Optimization of Biogas and Biomethane Yield from Anaerobic Conversion of Pepper Waste Using Response Surface Methodology

被引:0
|
作者
Bensegueni, Chaima [1 ]
Kheireddine, Bani [1 ]
Khalfaoui, Amel [2 ]
Amrouci, Zahra [1 ]
Bouznada, Maya Ouissem [1 ]
Derbal, Kerroum [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Constantine 3, Fac Proc Engn, Lab Rech Medicament & Dev Durable ReMeDD, Constantine 25000, Algeria
[2] Univ Salah Boubnider Constantine 3, Fac Proc Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Lab Environm Proc Engn LIPE, Constantine 25000, Algeria
[3] Ecole Natl Polytech Constantine, Dept Proc Engn, Lab Proc Engn Sustainable Dev & Hlth Prod GPDDPS, Constantine 25000, Algeria
关键词
anaerobic digestion; pH; inoculum/substrate ratio; design expert; numerical optimization; METHANE YIELD; CO-DIGESTION; BY-PRODUCTS; RATIO;
D O I
10.3390/su17062688
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is a critical method for producing bioenergy from organic waste; however, its efficiency is highly influenced by several factors. This study aimed to enhance the AD process using the removed solid phase generated by the canning plant Amor Benamor (CAB) during the production of harissa. This research sought to identify the optimum pH conditions and inoculum/substrate ratio (I/S) for achieving the maximum biogas production while ensuring a high methane yield, using response surface methodology (RSM) and numerical optimization. The batch anaerobic digestion of pepper waste as a substrate and sewage sludge as an inoculum was conducted. The 11 experimental runs generated by Design Expert Software were conducted in reactors with a capacity of 150 mL and a working volume of 90 mL, under thermophilic conditions. The effects of pH in the range of 7 to 8 and an I/S ratio in the range of 0.167 to 0.5, and their interaction in terms of biogas and methane yield (mL/g VS), were evaluated using a central composite design (CCD). The findings highlighted that a pH of around 7.5 and an I/S ratio of 0.48 could give the highest predicted yield of 884.35 mL/g VS for biogas and 422.828 mL/g VS for methane. These predicted values were confirmed with an experimental validation run which exhibited a deviation of less than 5%. These results offer new opportunities for enhanced biogas production from accumulated waste, contributing to the growth of sustainable energy alternatives.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biotransformation of flower waste composting: Optimization of waste combinations using response surface methodology
    Sharma, Dayanand
    Yadav, Kunwar D.
    Kumar, Sunil
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 270 : 198 - 207
  • [32] Optimization of biogas potential using kinetic models, response surface methodology, and instrumental evidence for biodegradation of tannery fleshings during anaerobic digestion
    Kumar, V. Kavan
    Mahendiran, R.
    Subramanian, P.
    Karthikeyan, S.
    Surendrakumar, A.
    Kumargouda, V.
    Ravi, Y.
    Choudhary, Sharda
    Singh, Ravindra
    Verma, Arvind K.
    OPEN LIFE SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [33] Optimization of pectin yield extracted from coffee Arabica pulp using response surface methodology
    Biratu, Girma
    Woldemariam, Henock Woldemichael
    Gonfa, Girma
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (08)
  • [34] Optimization of biogas yield from anaerobic digestion of silages and industrial wastes
    Kacprzak, A.
    Krzystek, L.
    Ledakowicz, S.
    NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 25 : S265 - S266
  • [35] Determination and Optimization of Flavonoid and Extract Yield from Brown Mango using Response Surface Methodology
    Prasad, K. Nagendra
    Kong, Kin Weng
    Ramanan, Ramakrishnan Nagasundara
    Azlan, Azrina
    Ismail, Amin
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 47 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [36] Modeling and optimization of bioethanol production yield from corn starch using response surface methodology
    Alalyani, Salim Rashid Salim
    Lakkimsetty, Nageswara Rao
    Shaik, Feroz
    Varghese, M. J.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,
  • [37] Effect of Thermal Pretreatment of Pineapple Peel Waste in Biogas Production using Response Surface Methodology
    Arifan, Fahmi
    Broto, Raden Teguh Dwiputro Wisnu
    Sumardiono, Siswo
    Sutaryo
    Dewi, Aprilia Larasati
    Yudanto, Yusuf Arya
    Sapatra, Enrico Fendy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 13 (03) : 619 - 632
  • [38] Process Optimization of Microfibrillated Cellulose Extraction from Cotton Waste Using Response Surface Methodology
    Jayasinghe, J. M. R.
    Ratnakumar, A.
    Samarasekara, A. M. P. B.
    Amarasinghe, D. A. S.
    MORATUWA ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (MERCON 2021) / 7TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2021, : 54 - 59
  • [39] Process optimization for the preparation of activated coke from industrial waste using response surface methodology
    Xue, Juanqin
    Jing, Xiande
    Hu, Shudi
    Tian, Yuhong
    Song, Yonghui
    Lan, Xinzhe
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2019, 18 (04) : 1415 - 1421
  • [40] Optimization of extraction of gold from waste printed circuit board using response surface methodology
    Zhu, Xiao-Guang
    Xi, Xiao-Li
    Nie, Zuo-Ren
    Ma, Li-Wen
    Zhu, Jian-Jian
    Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2013, 23 (06): : 1739 - 1745