Optimization of Biogas and Biomethane Yield from Anaerobic Conversion of Pepper Waste Using Response Surface Methodology

被引:0
|
作者
Bensegueni, Chaima [1 ]
Kheireddine, Bani [1 ]
Khalfaoui, Amel [2 ]
Amrouci, Zahra [1 ]
Bouznada, Maya Ouissem [1 ]
Derbal, Kerroum [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Constantine 3, Fac Proc Engn, Lab Rech Medicament & Dev Durable ReMeDD, Constantine 25000, Algeria
[2] Univ Salah Boubnider Constantine 3, Fac Proc Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Lab Environm Proc Engn LIPE, Constantine 25000, Algeria
[3] Ecole Natl Polytech Constantine, Dept Proc Engn, Lab Proc Engn Sustainable Dev & Hlth Prod GPDDPS, Constantine 25000, Algeria
关键词
anaerobic digestion; pH; inoculum/substrate ratio; design expert; numerical optimization; METHANE YIELD; CO-DIGESTION; BY-PRODUCTS; RATIO;
D O I
10.3390/su17062688
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is a critical method for producing bioenergy from organic waste; however, its efficiency is highly influenced by several factors. This study aimed to enhance the AD process using the removed solid phase generated by the canning plant Amor Benamor (CAB) during the production of harissa. This research sought to identify the optimum pH conditions and inoculum/substrate ratio (I/S) for achieving the maximum biogas production while ensuring a high methane yield, using response surface methodology (RSM) and numerical optimization. The batch anaerobic digestion of pepper waste as a substrate and sewage sludge as an inoculum was conducted. The 11 experimental runs generated by Design Expert Software were conducted in reactors with a capacity of 150 mL and a working volume of 90 mL, under thermophilic conditions. The effects of pH in the range of 7 to 8 and an I/S ratio in the range of 0.167 to 0.5, and their interaction in terms of biogas and methane yield (mL/g VS), were evaluated using a central composite design (CCD). The findings highlighted that a pH of around 7.5 and an I/S ratio of 0.48 could give the highest predicted yield of 884.35 mL/g VS for biogas and 422.828 mL/g VS for methane. These predicted values were confirmed with an experimental validation run which exhibited a deviation of less than 5%. These results offer new opportunities for enhanced biogas production from accumulated waste, contributing to the growth of sustainable energy alternatives.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utilization of pumice for improving biogas production from poultry manure by anaerobic digestion: A modeling and process optimization study using response surface methodology
    Yilmaz, Sakir
    Sahan, Tekin
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2020, 138
  • [22] Optimization Condition of Astaxanthin Extract from Shrimp Waste Using Response Surface Methodology
    Yoon, Chang Hwan
    Bok, Hee Sung
    Choi, Dae Ki
    Row, Kyung Ho
    KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (03): : 545 - 550
  • [23] Optimization of recovering cerium from the waste polishing powder using response surface methodology
    Lu, Shuaidan
    Sun, Shuchen
    Huang, Xiaoxiao
    Tu, Ganfeng
    Zhu, Xiaoping
    Kong, Xianghui
    GREEN PROCESSING AND SYNTHESIS, 2017, 6 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [24] Optimization and production of bioplastic from bio waste using response surface methodology (RSM)
    Magesh, A.
    Jayabalan, K.
    Kannan, R. Rajesh
    Rathakrishnan, P.
    Dilipkumar, M.
    Suriyaprakash, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 32 (01) : 179 - 190
  • [25] Optimization of Aluminum Recovery from Aluminum Smelting Waste Using the Surface Response Methodology
    Suprapto, Suprapto
    Ni'mah, Yatim Lailun
    Ulfin, Ita
    Harmami, Harmami
    Kurniawan, Fredy
    Sugiarso, Djarot
    Juwono, Hendro
    Hidayatulloh, Kiki Cahayati
    Septiandini, Gayu
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON CHEMICAL EDUCATION: TRENDS, APPLICATIONS, CHANGES IN CHEMICAL EDUCATION FOR THE 4.0 INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, 2020, 2229
  • [26] Optimization of biodiesel production from the waste cooking oil using response surface methodology
    Hamze, Hoda
    Akia, Mandana
    Yazdani, Farshad
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2015, 94 : 1 - 10
  • [27] Optimization of biodiesel production from selected waste oils using response surface methodology
    Ayoola A.A.
    Hymore K.F.
    Omonhinmin C.A.
    Biotechnology, 2017, 16 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [28] Response surface methodology for anaerobic digestion of waste from poultry slaughterhouse: Optimization of load and hydraulic retention time
    Habchi, Sanae
    Lahboubi, Nabila
    Sallek, Brahim
    El Bari, Hassan
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 18
  • [29] Optimization of reduced graphene oxide yield using response surface methodology
    Anakli, Duygu
    Ersan, Mehtap
    DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS, 2024, 148
  • [30] Optimization of Food Waste Bioevaporation Process Using Response Surface Methodology
    Yang, Benqin
    Jahng, Deokjin
    DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (10) : 1188 - 1198