Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests

被引:0
|
作者
Droppelmann, Guillermo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, Constanza [4 ]
Smague, Dali [4 ]
Jorquera, Carlos [5 ]
Feijoo, Felipe [6 ]
机构
[1] MEDS Clin, Res Ctr Med Exercise Sport & Hlth, Santiago, RM, Chile
[2] Univ Catolica Murcia UCAM, Hlth Sci PhD Program, Murcia, Spain
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Finis Terrae, Fac Med, Santiago, RM, Chile
[5] Univ Mayor, Fac Ciencias, Escuela Nutr & Dietet, Santiago, RM, Chile
[6] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Sch Ind Engn, Valparaiso, Chile
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; diagnostic; orthopedics; radiology; tendinopathy; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1530/EOR-24-0016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
center dot Purpose: Different deep-learning models have been employed to aid in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal pathologies. The diagnosis of tendon pathologies could particularly benefit from applying these technologies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of deep learning models in diagnosing tendon pathologies using various imaging modalities. center dot Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted, with searches performed on MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and SciELO. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to assess the quality of the studies. Diagnostic measures, such as sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive and negative likelihood ratios, area under the curve, and summary receiver operating characteristic, were included using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses were also conducted. All statistical analyses and plots were generated using the R software package. The PROSPERO ID is CRD42024506491. center dot Results: Eleven deep-learning models from six articles were analyzed. In the random effects models, the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithms for detecting tendon conditions were 0.910 (95% CI: 0.865; 0.940) and 0.954 (0.909; 0.977). The PLR, NLR, lnDOR, and AUC estimates were found to be 37.075 (95%CI: 4.654; 69.496), 0.114 (95%CI: 0.056; 0.171), 5.160 (95% CI: 4.070; 6.250) with a (P < 0.001), and 96%, respectively. center dot Conclusion: The deep-learning algorithms demonstrated a high level of accuracy level in detecting tendon anomalies. The overall robust performance suggests their potential application as a valuable complementary tool in diagnosing medical images.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 952
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haroon, Shamil
    Jordan, Rachel
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Adab, Peymane
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (10):
  • [32] Machine learning and deep learning models for preoperative detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abbaspour, Elahe
    Mansoori, Bahar
    Karimzadhagh, Sahand
    Chalian, Majid
    Pouramini, Alireza
    Sheida, Fateme
    Daskareh, Mahyar
    Haseli, Sara
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, : 1927 - 1941
  • [33] Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    Tarrio, Isabel
    Blumenthal, Kimberly G.
    Araujo, Luis
    Azevedo, Luis Filipe
    Delgado, Luis
    Fonseca, Joao Almedia
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 147 (01) : 296 - 308
  • [34] Accuracy of cholera rapid diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muzembo, Basilua Andre
    Kitahara, Kei
    Debnath, Anusuya
    Okamoto, Keinosuke
    Miyoshi, Shin-Ichi
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [35] Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Binh, Le Nguyen
    Nhu, Nguyen Thanh
    Nhi, Pham Thi Uyen
    Son, Do Le Hoang
    Bach, Nguyen
    Huy, Hoang Quoc
    Le, Nguyen Quoc Khanh
    Kang, Jiunn-Horng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [36] Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests
    Halligan, S
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (09) : 977 - 979
  • [37] Deep learning visual analysis in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis
    Anteby, Roi
    Horesh, Nir
    Soffer, Shelly
    Zager, Yaniv
    Barash, Yiftach
    Amiel, Imri
    Rosin, Danny
    Gutman, Mordechai
    Klang, Eyal
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (04): : 1521 - 1533
  • [38] Deep learning visual analysis in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis
    Roi Anteby
    Nir Horesh
    Shelly Soffer
    Yaniv Zager
    Yiftach Barash
    Imri Amiel
    Danny Rosin
    Mordechai Gutman
    Eyal Klang
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 1521 - 1533
  • [39] Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Lung Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zheng, Xiushan
    He, Bo
    Hu, Yunhai
    Ren, Min
    Chen, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Zhiguang
    Ma, Jun
    Ouyang, Lanwei
    Chu, Hongmei
    Gao, Huan
    He, Wenjing
    Liu, Tianhu
    Li, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10 : 938113
  • [40] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning using speech samples in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Lidan
    Liu, Lu
    Wafa, Hatem A.
    Tydeman, Florence
    Xie, Wanqing
    Wang, Yanzhong
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 31 (10) : 2394 - 2404