Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:61
|
作者
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tarrio, Isabel [1 ]
Blumenthal, Kimberly G. [4 ,5 ]
Araujo, Luis [2 ,3 ]
Azevedo, Luis Filipe [1 ,2 ]
Delgado, Luis [2 ,3 ]
Fonseca, Joao Almedia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, MEDCIDS, Dept Community Med Informat & Hlth Decis Sci, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, CINTESIS, Rua Dr Placido da Costa, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Basic & Clin Immunol Unit, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Div Rheumatol Allergy & Immunol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Diagnostic accuracy; drug provocation test; IgE quantification; penicillin allergy; skin tests; BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS; DRUG PROVOCATION TESTS; HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS; NONIMMEDIATE REACTIONS; AMOXICILLIN ALLERGY; ORAL CHALLENGE; IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; CLINICAL HISTORY; CROSS-REACTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.058
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Having a penicillin allergy label associates with a higher risk for antibiotic resistance and increased health care use. Objective: We sought to assess the accuracy of skin tests and specific IgE quantification in the diagnostic evaluation of patients reporting a penicillin/B-lactam allergy. Methods: We performed a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis, searching on MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies conducted in patients reporting a penicillin allergy and in whom skin tests and/or specific IgE quantification were performed and compared with drug challenge results. We quantitatively assessed the accuracy of diagnostic tests with bivariate random-effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore causes of heterogeneity. Studies' quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2 criteria. Results: We included 105 primary studies, assessing 31,761 participants. Twenty-seven studies were assessed by bivariate meta-analysis. Skin tests had a summary sensitivity of 30.7% (95% CI, 18.9%-45.9%) and a specificity of 96.8% (95% CI, 94.2%-98.3%), with a partial area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.686 (I-2 = 38.2%). Similar results were observed for subanalyses restricted to patients reporting nonimmediate maculopapular exanthema or urticaria/angioedema. Specific IgE had a summary sensitivity of 19.3% (95% CI, 12.0%-29.4%) and a specificity of 97.4% (95% CI, 95.2%-98.6%), with a partial area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.420 (I-2 = 8.5%). Projected predictive values mainly reflect the low frequency of true penicillin allergy. Conclusions: Skin tests and specific IgE quantification appear to have low sensitivity and high specificity. Because current evidence is insufficient for assessing the role of these tests in stratifying patients for delabeling, we identified key requirements needed for future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 308
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of skin tests in patients with a penicillin allergy label: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Sousa-Pinto, B. M.
    Tarrio, I
    Delgado, L.
    Fonseca, J. A.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2019, 74 : 157 - 158
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of tests for leprosy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gurung, P.
    Gomes, C. M.
    Vernal, S.
    Leeflang, M. M. G.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (11) : 1315 - 1327
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests of the hip: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Reiman, Michael P.
    Goode, Adam P.
    Hegedus, Eric J.
    Cook, Chad E.
    Wright, Alexis A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 47 (14) : 893 - 902
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haroon, Shamil
    Jordan, Rachel
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Adab, Peymane
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (10):
  • [5] Accuracy of cholera rapid diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muzembo, Basilua Andre
    Kitahara, Kei
    Debnath, Anusuya
    Okamoto, Keinosuke
    Miyoshi, Shin-Ichi
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [6] Increased diagnostic accuracy by using allergen component tests in hazelnut allergy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Berthold, M.
    Mascialino, B.
    Fountain, D.
    Cadwell, K.
    Papageorgakopoulou, C.
    Sjolander, S.
    Hamilton, R. G.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2017, 72 : 430 - 430
  • [7] Accuracy of tuberculosis diagnostic tests in small ruminants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roy, A.
    Infantes-Lorenzo, J. A.
    de la Cruz, M. L.
    Dominguez, L.
    Alvarez, J.
    Bezos, J.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2020, 182
  • [8] Systematic review with meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID-19
    Boger, Beatriz
    Fachi, Mariana M.
    Vilhena, Raquel O.
    Cobre, Alexandre F.
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2021, 49 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [9] Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ladermann, Alexandre
    Collin, Philippe
    Zbinden, Olivia
    Meynard, Timon
    Saffarini, Mo
    Chiu, Joe Chih-Hao
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [10] Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Chagas Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Candia-Puma, Mayron Antonio
    Machaca-Luque, Laura Yesenia
    Roque-Pumahuanca, Brychs Milagros
    Galdino, Alexsandro Sobreira
    Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro
    Ferraz Coelho, Eduardo Antonio
    Chavez-Fumagalli, Miguel Angel
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)