A Metric for Evaluating Image Quality Difference Perception Ability in Blind Image Quality Assessment Models

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Jinchi [1 ]
Li, Yuying [1 ]
Zhao, Yidan [2 ]
Lin, Qiang [1 ]
Zhang, Suiyu [1 ]
Ma, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Yu, Dingguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Commun Univ Zhejiang, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Blind Image Quality Assessment; Model Comparison; Image Quality Difference Perception Ability; Model Falsification Methodology; Performance Metric; NATURAL SCENE STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1145/3689093.3689182
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Blind Image Quality Assessment (BIQA) is a challenging research area essential for preprocessing and optimizing visual tasks like semantic recognition and image restoration. Due to the high cost of subjective experiments and the complexity of IQA data, BIQA remains a small-sample learning problem. Transfer learning methods have been introduced to address this. With advancements from VGG to Swin Transformer, new semantic backbones are continuously proposed. This paper is interested in whether the backbones with improving performance in semantic recognition also enhance predictive accuracy in BIQA tasks. However, comparative experiments showed that different semantic backbones, using appropriate pipelines, exhibit minimal differences in PLCC and SRCC, making it hard to identify the superior model. To resolve this, we propose a novel model comparison method, IQDP, based on the model falsification method. IQDP experiments revealed that models with similar accuracy can differ significantly in perceiving image quality differences, which traditional PLCC and SRCC struggle to capture. Based on this, we further implemented a new metric, Image Quality Difference Perception Ability, to supplement the traditional PLCC and SRCC, providing an effective means of identifying superior models.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 20
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] No training blind image quality assessment
    Chu, Ying
    Mou, Xuanqin
    Ji, Zhen
    DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY X, 2014, 9023
  • [22] Image Quality Assessment and Color Difference
    Temel, Dogancan
    AlRegib, Ghassan
    2014 IEEE GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (GLOBALSIP), 2014, : 970 - 974
  • [23] BLIND IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT WITH A PROBABILISTIC QUALITY REPRESENTATION
    Zeng, Hui
    Zhang, Lei
    Bovik, Alan C.
    2018 25TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2018, : 609 - 613
  • [24] A novel blind image quality assessment metric and its feature selection strategy
    Chu, Ying
    Mou, Xuanqin
    Hong, Wei
    Ji, Zhen
    DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY IX, 2013, 8660
  • [25] BLIND IMAGE QUALITY METRIC FOR BLACKBOARD LECTURE IMAGES
    Imran, Ali Shariq
    Cheikh, Faouzi Alaya
    18TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO-2010), 2010, : 333 - 337
  • [26] Quality-aware Pre-trained Models for Blind Image Quality Assessment
    Zhao, Kai
    Yuan, Kun
    Sun, Ming
    Li, Mading
    Wen, Xing
    2023 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2023, : 22302 - 22313
  • [27] A METRIC OF STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE RETARGETING QUALITY ASSESSMENT
    Liu, Yi
    Sun, Lifeng
    Zhu, Wenwu
    Yang, Shiqiang
    2015 IEEE CHINA SUMMIT & INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2015, : 667 - 671
  • [28] Statistical Metric Fusion for Image Quality Assessment
    Xu, Jingtao
    Li, Qiaohong
    Ye, Peng
    Du, Haiqing
    Liu, Yong
    2014 IEEE VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING CONFERENCE, 2014, : 133 - 136
  • [29] AN IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT METRIC BASED CONTOURLET
    Lu, Wen
    Gao, Xinbo
    Li, Xuelong
    Tao, Dacheng
    2008 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1172 - 1175
  • [30] Blind Image Quality Assessment by Pairwise Ranking Image Series
    Xu, Li
    Jiang, Xiuhua
    CHINA COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 20 (09) : 127 - 143