A Metric for Evaluating Image Quality Difference Perception Ability in Blind Image Quality Assessment Models

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Jinchi [1 ]
Li, Yuying [1 ]
Zhao, Yidan [2 ]
Lin, Qiang [1 ]
Zhang, Suiyu [1 ]
Ma, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Yu, Dingguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Commun Univ Zhejiang, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Blind Image Quality Assessment; Model Comparison; Image Quality Difference Perception Ability; Model Falsification Methodology; Performance Metric; NATURAL SCENE STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1145/3689093.3689182
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Blind Image Quality Assessment (BIQA) is a challenging research area essential for preprocessing and optimizing visual tasks like semantic recognition and image restoration. Due to the high cost of subjective experiments and the complexity of IQA data, BIQA remains a small-sample learning problem. Transfer learning methods have been introduced to address this. With advancements from VGG to Swin Transformer, new semantic backbones are continuously proposed. This paper is interested in whether the backbones with improving performance in semantic recognition also enhance predictive accuracy in BIQA tasks. However, comparative experiments showed that different semantic backbones, using appropriate pipelines, exhibit minimal differences in PLCC and SRCC, making it hard to identify the superior model. To resolve this, we propose a novel model comparison method, IQDP, based on the model falsification method. IQDP experiments revealed that models with similar accuracy can differ significantly in perceiving image quality differences, which traditional PLCC and SRCC struggle to capture. Based on this, we further implemented a new metric, Image Quality Difference Perception Ability, to supplement the traditional PLCC and SRCC, providing an effective means of identifying superior models.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 20
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blind Image Quality Metric for Blurry and Noisy Image
    Seghir, Zianou Ahmed
    Hachouf, Fella
    Morain-Nicolier, Frederic
    2013 IEEE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICIIP), 2013, : 193 - 197
  • [2] Image quality metric based on multidimensional contrast perception models
    Pons, AM
    Malo, J
    Artigas, JM
    Capilla, P
    DISPLAYS, 1999, 20 (02) : 93 - 110
  • [3] Image Quality Difference Perception Ability: A BIQA model effectiveness metric based on model falsification method
    Zhu, Jinchi
    Ma, Xiaoyu
    Yu, Dingguo
    Li, Yuying
    Zhao, Yidan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2025, 260
  • [4] A No Reference Image Quality Assessment Metric Based on Visual Perception
    Fu, Yan
    Wang, Shengchun
    ALGORITHMS, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [5] Blind tone mapped image quality assessment with image segmentation and visual perception
    Chi, Biwei
    Yu, Mei
    Jiang, Gangyi
    He, Zhouyan
    Peng, Zongju
    Chen, Fen
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2020, 67
  • [6] Blind image quality assessment
    Li, X
    2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 449 - 452
  • [7] A Perceptual Blind Blur Image Quality Metric
    Kerouh, Fatma
    Serir, Amina
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2014,
  • [8] Image quality assessment metric for frame accumulated image
    Yu, Jianping
    Li, Gang
    Wang, Shaohui
    Lin, Ling
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2018, 89 (01):
  • [9] A fuzzy metric for image quality assessment
    Li, JL
    Chen, G
    Chi, ZR
    10TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3: MEETING THE GRAND CHALLENGE: MACHINES THAT SERVE PEOPLE, 2001, : 562 - 565
  • [10] An Underwater Image Quality Assessment Metric
    Guo, Pengfei
    Liu, Hantao
    Zeng, Delu
    Xiang, Tao
    Li, Leida
    Gu, Ke
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2023, 25 : 5093 - 5106