How different immersive environments affect intracortical brain computer interfaces

被引:0
|
作者
Tortolani, Ariana F. [1 ]
Kunigk, Nicolas G. [2 ,3 ]
Sobinov, Anton R. [4 ]
Boninger, Michael L. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Bensmaia, Sliman J. [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Collinger, Jennifer L. [2 ,3 ,5 ,7 ]
Hatsopoulos, Nicholas G. [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Downey, John E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Comm Computat Neurosci, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Rehab Neural Engn Labs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Organismal Biol & Anat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Neurosci Inst, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
intracortical BCI; virtual environment; motor cortex; motor learning; MOTOR IMAGERY; REHABILITATION; TETRAPLEGIA;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/adb078
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. As brain-computer interface (BCI) research advances, many new applications are being developed. Tasks can be performed in different virtual environments, and whether a BCI user can switch environments seamlessly will influence the ultimate utility of a clinical device. Approach. Here we investigate the importance of the immersiveness of the virtual environment used to train BCI decoders on the resulting decoder and its generalizability between environments. Two participants who had intracortical electrodes implanted in their precentral gyrus used a BCI to control a virtual arm, both viewed immersively through virtual reality goggles and at a distance on a flat television monitor. Main results. Each participant performed better with a decoder trained and tested in the environment they had used the most prior to the study, one for each environment type. The neural tuning to the desired movement was minimally influenced by the immersiveness of the environment. Finally, in further testing with one of the participants, we found that decoders trained in one environment generalized well to the other environment, but the order in which the environments were experienced within a session mattered. Significance. Overall, experience with an environment was more influential on performance than the immersiveness of the environment, but BCI performance generalized well after accounting for experience.Clinical Trial: NCT01894802
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-modal Affect Induction for Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Muhl, Christian
    van den Broek, Egon L.
    Brouwer, Anne-Marie
    Nijboer, Femke
    van Wouwe, Nelleke
    Heylen, Dirk
    AFFECTIVE COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT INTERACTION, PT I, 2011, 6974 : 235 - +
  • [42] Factors that affect classification performance in EEG based brain-computer interfaces
    Argunsah, Ali Oezguer
    Cuerueklue, Ali Baran
    Etin, Muejdat
    Ercil, Aytuel
    2007 IEEE 15TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 91 - 95
  • [43] Brain-computer interfaces based on intracortical recordings of neural activity for restoration of movement and communication of people with paralysis
    Milekovic, Tomislav
    2018 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE (BCI), 2018, : 95 - 96
  • [44] Intracortical Brain-Machine Interfaces Advance Sensorimotor Neuroscience
    Schroeder, Karen E.
    Chestek, Cynthia A.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [45] Cooking with the elements: Intuitive immersive interfaces for augmented reality environments
    Bonanni, L
    Lee, CH
    Selker, T
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT 2005, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3585 : 1022 - 1025
  • [46] Demonstration of a portable intracortical brain-computer interface
    Weiss, Jeffrey M.
    Gaunt, Robert A.
    Franklin, Robert
    Boninger, Michael L.
    Collinger, Jennifer L.
    BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES, 2019, 6 (04) : 106 - 117
  • [47] Effect of different feedback modalities in the performance of brain-computer interfaces
    Angulo-Sherman, I. N.
    Gutierrez, D.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTERS (CONIELECOMP), 2014, : 14 - 21
  • [48] The ethics of brain–computer interfaces
    Drew L.
    Nature, 2019, 571 (7766) : S19 - S21
  • [49] Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
    Fernando Nicolas-Alonso, Luis
    Gomez-Gil, Jaime
    SENSORS, 2012, 12 (02) : 1211 - 1279
  • [50] Alternative Classification Techniques for Brain-Computer Interfaces for Smart Sensor Manufacturing Environments
    Balderas, David
    Molina, Arturo
    Ponce, Pedro
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (03): : 680 - 685