How different immersive environments affect intracortical brain computer interfaces

被引:0
|
作者
Tortolani, Ariana F. [1 ]
Kunigk, Nicolas G. [2 ,3 ]
Sobinov, Anton R. [4 ]
Boninger, Michael L. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Bensmaia, Sliman J. [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Collinger, Jennifer L. [2 ,3 ,5 ,7 ]
Hatsopoulos, Nicholas G. [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Downey, John E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Comm Computat Neurosci, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Rehab Neural Engn Labs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Organismal Biol & Anat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Neurosci Inst, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
intracortical BCI; virtual environment; motor cortex; motor learning; MOTOR IMAGERY; REHABILITATION; TETRAPLEGIA;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/adb078
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. As brain-computer interface (BCI) research advances, many new applications are being developed. Tasks can be performed in different virtual environments, and whether a BCI user can switch environments seamlessly will influence the ultimate utility of a clinical device. Approach. Here we investigate the importance of the immersiveness of the virtual environment used to train BCI decoders on the resulting decoder and its generalizability between environments. Two participants who had intracortical electrodes implanted in their precentral gyrus used a BCI to control a virtual arm, both viewed immersively through virtual reality goggles and at a distance on a flat television monitor. Main results. Each participant performed better with a decoder trained and tested in the environment they had used the most prior to the study, one for each environment type. The neural tuning to the desired movement was minimally influenced by the immersiveness of the environment. Finally, in further testing with one of the participants, we found that decoders trained in one environment generalized well to the other environment, but the order in which the environments were experienced within a session mattered. Significance. Overall, experience with an environment was more influential on performance than the immersiveness of the environment, but BCI performance generalized well after accounting for experience.Clinical Trial: NCT01894802
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wearable, wireless Brain Computer Interfaces in augmented reality environments
    Navarro, KF
    ITCC 2004: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: CODING AND COMPUTING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 643 - 647
  • [22] Brain-Computer Interfaces - A Survey on Interactive Virtual Environments
    Kerous, Bojan
    Liarokapis, Fotis
    2016 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GAMES AND VIRTUAL WORLDS FOR SERIOUS APPLICATIONS (VS-GAMES), 2016,
  • [23] Sense of agency for intracortical brain–machine interfaces
    Andrea Serino
    Marcia Bockbrader
    Tommaso Bertoni
    Sam Colachis IV
    Marco Solcà
    Collin Dunlap
    Kaitie Eipel
    Patrick Ganzer
    Nick Annetta
    Gaurav Sharma
    Pavo Orepic
    David Friedenberg
    Per Sederberg
    Nathan Faivre
    Ali Rezai
    Olaf Blanke
    Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6 : 565 - 578
  • [24] Feasibility of Automatic Error Detect-and-Undo System in Human Intracortical Brain Computer Interfaces
    Even-Chen, Nir
    Stavisky, Sergey D.
    Pandarinath, Chethan
    Nuyujukian, Paul
    Blabe, Christine H.
    Hochberg, Leigh R.
    Henderson, Jaimie M.
    Shenoy, Krishna, V
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 65 (08) : 1771 - 1784
  • [25] Advantages of closed-loop calibration in intracortical brain-computer interfaces for people with tetraplegia
    Jarosiewicz, Beata
    Masse, Nicolas Y.
    Bacher, Daniel
    Cash, Sydney S.
    Eskandar, Emad
    Friehs, Gerhard
    Donoghue, John P.
    Hochberg, Leigh R.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 10 (04)
  • [26] Motor somatotopy impacts imagery strategy success in human intracortical brain-computer interfaces
    Kunigk, N. G.
    Schone, H. R.
    Gontier, C.
    Hockeimer, W.
    Tortolani, A. F.
    Hatsopoulos, N. G.
    Downey, J. E.
    Chase, S. M.
    Boninger, M. L.
    Dekleva, B. D.
    Collinger, J. L.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 22 (02)
  • [27] Comparison of different feature classifiers for brain computer interfaces
    Cincotti, F
    Scipione, A
    Timperi, A
    Mattia, D
    Marciani, MG
    Millán, J
    Salinari, S
    Bianchi, L
    Babiloni, F
    1ST INTERNATIONAL IEEE EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING 2003, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 645 - 647
  • [28] Non-immersive Versus Immersive Extended Reality for Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Within a Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Arpaia, Pasquale
    Coyle, Damien
    Donnarumma, Francesco
    Esposito, Antonio
    Natalizio, Angela
    Parvis, Marco
    EXTENDED REALITY, XR SALENTO 2022, PT II, 2022, 13446 : 407 - 419
  • [29] Effects of exposure to immersive computer-generated virtual nature and control environments on affect and cognition
    Mostajeran, Fariba
    Fischer, Marvin
    Steinicke, Frank
    Kuehn, Simone
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [30] Effects of exposure to immersive computer-generated virtual nature and control environments on affect and cognition
    Fariba Mostajeran
    Marvin Fischer
    Frank Steinicke
    Simone Kühn
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)