The Validity and Usability of Markerless Motion Capture and Inertial Measurement Units for Quantifying Dynamic Movements

被引:0
|
作者
Edwards, Nathan a. [1 ,2 ]
Caccese, Jaclyn b. [1 ,2 ]
Tracy, Ryan e. [2 ]
Hagen, Joshua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Quatman-yates, Catherine c. [2 ]
Onate, James [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Human Performance Collaborat, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Integrated Syst Engn, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
BIOMECHANICS; KINEMATICS; MOTION ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT; WEARABLE SENSORS; JOINT COORDINATE SYSTEM; ISB RECOMMENDATION; CENTER LOCATION; LOWER-EXTREMITY; GAIT; HIP; RELIABILITY; KNEE; DEFINITIONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1249/MSS.0000000000003579
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
PurposeMotion capture technology is quickly evolving, providing researchers, clinicians, and coaches with more access to biomechanics data. Markerless motion capture and inertial measurement units (IMUs) are continually developing biomechanics tools that need validation for dynamic movements before widespread use in applied settings. This study evaluated the validity of a markerless motion capture, IMU, and red, green, blue, and depth (RGBD) camera system as compared with marker-based motion capture during countermovement jumps, overhead squats, lunges, and runs with cuts.MethodsThirty adults were recruited for this study (sex: 18 females, 12 males; age: 25.4 +/- 8.6 yrs; height: 1.71 +/- 0.08 m; weight: 71.6 +/- 11.5 kg). Data were collected simultaneously with four motion capture technologies (i.e., Vicon, marker-based; Theia/Optitrack, markerless; APDM Opals, IMUs; and Vald HumanTrak, RGBD camera). System validity for lower and upper body joint angles was evaluated using bias, root mean squared error (RMSE), precision, maximum absolute error, and intraclass correlation coefficients. System usability was descriptively analyzed.ResultsOverall, markerless motion capture had the highest validity (sagittal plane RMSE: 3.20 degrees-15.66 degrees; frontal plane RMSE: 2.12 degrees-9.14 degrees; transverse plane RMSE: 3.160 degrees-56.61 degrees), followed by the IMU system (sagittal plane RMSE: 8.11 degrees-28.37 degrees; frontal plane RMSE: 3.26 degrees-16.98 degrees; transverse plane RMSE: 5.08 degrees-116.75 degrees), and lastly the RGBD system (sagittal plane bias: 0.55 degrees-129.48 degrees; frontal plane bias: 1.35 degrees-52.06 degrees).ConclusionsMarkerless motion capture and IMUs have moderate validity for joint kinematics, whereas the RGBD system did not have adequate validity. Markerless systems have lower data processing time, require moderate technical expertise, but have high data storage size. IMUs are easier to use, can collect data in any location, but require participant set-up. Overall, individuals using motion capture should consider the specific movements, testing locations, and technical expertise available before selecting a system.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 655
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating the validity and reliability of inertial measurement units for determining knee and trunk kinematics during athletic landing and cutting movements
    Chia, Lionel
    Andersen, Jordan T.
    McKay, Marnee J.
    Sullivan, Justin
    Megalaa, Tomas
    Pappas, Evangelos
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2021, 60
  • [32] Defining humeral axial rotation with optical motion capture and inertial measurement units during functional task assessment
    Lang, Angelica E.
    Friesen, Kenzie B.
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2023, 61 (11) : 2963 - 2970
  • [33] Defining humeral axial rotation with optical motion capture and inertial measurement units during functional task assessment
    Angelica E. Lang
    Kenzie B. Friesen
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2023, 61 : 2963 - 2970
  • [34] A Low-Cost Marker-Based Optical Motion Capture System to Validate Inertial Measurement Units
    Siaw, Teck Ung
    Han, Yi Chiew
    Wong, Kiing Ing
    IEEE SENSORS LETTERS, 2023, 7 (02)
  • [35] A Novel, Wearable Inertial Measurement Unit for Stroke Survivors: Validity, Acceptability, and Usability
    Bishop, Lauri
    Demers, Marika
    Rowe, Justin
    Zondervan, Daniel
    Winstein, Carolee J.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 105 (06): : 1142 - 1150
  • [36] Motion Tracking in Crash Test Applications with Inertial Measurement Units
    Schoenebeck, Kai
    Melbert, Joachim
    Weiser, Florian
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PASSENGER CARS-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 2 (01): : 247 - 253
  • [37] EVALUATION OF INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS FOR SHORT TIME MOTION TRACKING
    Neurauter, Rene
    Hergel, Peter
    Gerstmayr, Johannes
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2021, VOL 9, 2021,
  • [38] Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity
    Al-Amri, Mohammad
    Nicholas, Kevin
    Button, Kate
    Sparkes, Valerie
    Sheeran, Liba
    Davies, Jennifer L.
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (03):
  • [39] Posturographic analysis through markerless motion capture without ground reaction forces measurement
    Corazza, Stefano
    Andriacchi, Thomas R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 42 (03) : 370 - 374
  • [40] A systematic review of the applications of markerless motion capture (MMC) technology for clinical measurement in rehabilitation
    Winnie W. T. Lam
    Yuk Ming Tang
    Kenneth N. K. Fong
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20