Uncertainty quantification of geochemical data imputation using Monte Carlo dropout

被引:0
|
作者
Puzyrev, Vladimir [1 ,2 ]
Duuring, Paul [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Formerly Sch Earth & Planetary Sci, Perth 6152, Australia
[2] Presently SLB Doll Res, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Geol Survey Western Australia, Dept Energy Mines Ind Regulat & Safety, Perth 6004, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Explorat Targeting, Perth 6009, Australia
关键词
Deep learning; Uncertainty quantification; Geochemical data; Monte Carlo dropout; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CAPRICORN OROGEN; MINERALOGY; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.gexplo.2025.107695
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Machine learning models have shown their promise in geochemical data imputation tasks. However, being blackbox solvers, these models require more confidence in their predictions. Using uncertainty quantification methods for deep neural networks can increase the reliability of their predictions. In this paper, we use Monte Carlo Dropout to estimate uncertainty in geochemical data imputation. Multiple forward passes with different dropout configurations yield a predictive distribution for the unknown analytes. The mean of this distribution is used as the prediction, while the standard deviation expresses the uncertainty of the neural networks. Two different scenarios, namely the WACHEM and WAMEX databases containing multi-element geochemical data for rock samples, illustrate the predictive accuracy of the method and its capability to measure the associated uncertainty. Dropout values of 0.1-0.2 were identified as a good balance in prediction accuracy and model uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty Quantification in Intelligent-Based Electrical Resistivity Tomography Image Reconstruction With Monte Carlo Dropout Strategy
    Lan, Xixi
    Zou, Changchun
    Peng, Cheng
    Wu, Caowei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61
  • [22] Monte Carlo Dropout for Uncertainty Analysis and ECG Trace Image Classification
    Islam, Md Farhadul
    Zabeen, Sarah
    Mehedi, Md Humaion Kabir
    Iqbal, Shadab
    Rasel, Annajiat Alim
    STRUCTURAL, SYNTACTIC, AND STATISTICAL PATTERN RECOGNITION, S+SSPR 2022, 2022, 13813 : 173 - 182
  • [23] Multilevel Monte Carlo FDTD Method for Uncertainty Quantification
    Zhu, Xiaojie
    Di Rienzo, Luca
    Ma, Xikui
    Codecasa, Lorenzo
    IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, 2022, 21 (10): : 2030 - 2034
  • [24] Multicanonical sequential Monte Carlo sampler for uncertainty quantification
    Millar, Robert
    Li, Hui
    Li, Jinglai
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 237
  • [25] An exact framework for uncertainty quantification in Monte Carlo simulation
    Saracco, P.
    Pia, M. G.
    20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING IN HIGH ENERGY AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS (CHEP2013), PARTS 1-6, 2014, 513
  • [26] Progress with Uncertainty Quantification in Generic Monte Carlo Simulations
    Saracco, P.
    Pia, M. G.
    2013 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2013,
  • [27] Prediction and uncertainty quantification of shale well performance using multifidelity Monte Carlo
    Mehana, Mohamed
    Pachalieva, Aleksandra
    Kumar, Ashish
    Santos, Javier
    O'Malley, Daniel
    Carey, William
    Sharma, Mukul
    Viswanathan, Hari
    GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 110
  • [28] Uncertainty quantification of offshore wind farms using Monte Carlo and sparse grid
    Richter, Pascal
    Wolters, Jannick
    Frank, Martin
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [29] Simplified models for uncertainty quantification of extreme events using Monte Carlo technique
    Hu, Xiaonong
    Fang, Genshen
    Yang, Jiayu
    Zhao, Lin
    Ge, Yaojun
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 230
  • [30] Bayesian deep learning-based 1H-MRS of the brain: Metabolite quantification with uncertainty estimation using Monte Carlo dropout
    Lee, Hyeong Hun
    Kim, Hyeonjin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 88 (01) : 38 - 52