Expanding the Estimated Fetal Weight Definition of Growth Restriction by Adding Small Abdominal Circumference Prediction of Neonatal Morbidity

被引:0
|
作者
Shea, Ashley [1 ]
Battarbee, Ashley N. [1 ,2 ]
Grantz, Katherine L. [3 ]
He, Dian [3 ,4 ]
Owen, John [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Ctr Womens Reprod Hlth, 1700 6th Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Womens Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHHD, Epidemiol Branch, Div Populat Hlth Res, Div Intramural Res,NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Prospective Grp Inc, Fairfax, VA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
estimated fetal weight; fetal abdominal circumference; fetal growth restriction; neonatal morbidity; predictive value; small for gestational age; GESTATIONAL-AGE; BIRTH-WEIGHT; TERM; SINGLETONS; MORTALITY; BORN; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/jum.16683
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective-The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's (SMFM) diagnostic criteria for fetal growth restriction (FGR) recently added abdominal circumference (AC) <10th percentile to estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th percentile; however, its prediction of neonatal morbidity is unknown. Our objective was to compare the two definitions for their prediction of composite neonatal morbidity. Methods-Secondary analysis of the Fetal Growth Study-Singletons, 2009-2013. The last ultrasound (mean 36.9 +/- 2.3 weeks) was included from non-anomalous fetuses. Composite neonatal morbidity was the primary outcome: metabolic acidosis, neonatal intensive care unit stay >3 days, significant respiratory morbidities, seizures, hyperbilirubinemia requiring exchange transfusion, intrapartum aspiration, necrotizing enterocolitis, hypoglycemia, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, periventricular leukomalacia, sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA). Logistic regression modeled the association of each FGR definition with outcomes, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) assessed predictive ability. Results-Of 2400 eligible individuals, 135 (5.6%) neonates had composite neonatal morbidity, and 245 (10%) were SGA. At the last ultrasound, 181 (7.5%) had FGR based on EFW alone (original definition) and 215 (9.0%) had FGR based on a small EFW or AC (expanded definition) (P < .0001). Both definitions had poor discrimination for composite neonatal morbidity (original: AUC 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.54; expanded: AUC 0.51, 95% CI, 0.48-0.54). Both had acceptable discrimination of SGA (original: AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73; expanded: AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.68-0.75). Conclusions-Adding AC <10th percentile to the EFW <10th percentile definition of FGR significantly increased the incidence of FGR but did not improve the prediction of neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population. The SMFM guideline for FGR should be adopted with caution.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of fetal growth restriction using estimated fetal weight vs a combined screening model in the third trimester
    Miranda, J.
    Rodriguez-Lopez, M.
    Triunfo, S.
    Sairanen, M.
    Kouru, H.
    Parra-Saavedra, M.
    Crovetto, F.
    Figueras, F.
    Crispi, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 603 - 611
  • [32] Using estimated fetal weight and cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse neonatal outcome in late onset fetal growth restriction
    Zdanowicz, J.
    Disler, M.
    Gerull, R.
    Raio, L.
    Surbek, D.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (10) : E144 - E144
  • [33] Isolated abdominal circumference vs. estimated fetal weight, which matters more?
    Ali, Fatima
    Canterino, Joseph
    Koscica, Karen
    DiStefano, Valeria
    Aikman, Noelle
    Faro, Jonathan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S640 - S640
  • [34] Disproportionate fetal abdominal growth and risk of neonatal hypoglycemia in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction
    Soehl, John R.
    Whelan, Anna
    Murphy, Lauren
    Savitz, David A.
    Esposito, Matthew A.
    Lord, Megan G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S666 - S666
  • [35] Isolated Abdominal Circumference &lt; 5% or Estimated Fetal Weight 10 to 19% as Predictors of Small for Gestational Age Infants
    Turitz, Amy L.
    Quant, Hayley
    Schwartz, Nadav
    Elovitz, Michal
    Bastek, Jamie A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 31 (06) : 469 - 475
  • [36] Fetal growth restriction defined by abdominal circumference alone predicts perinatal mortality
    Long, Miranda
    Nakahara, Angela
    Elmayan, Ardem
    Tivis, Rick
    Biggio, Joseph
    Williams, Frank
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S179 - S179
  • [37] Third trimester abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight and uterine artery doppler for the identification of newborns small and large for gestational age
    Di Lorenzo, Giovanni
    Monasta, Lorenzo
    Ceccarello, Matteo
    Cecotti, Vera
    D'Ottavio, Giuseppina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 166 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [38] Validity of a Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn for identifying neonatal morbidity
    Monier, Isabelle
    Ego, Anne
    Hocquette, Alice
    Benachi, Alexandra
    Goff, Francois
    Lelong, Nathalie
    Le Ray, Camille
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 232 (02) : 224e1 - 224e13
  • [39] Serial ultrasound measurements of fetal head circumference and abdominal circumference to predict fetal growth restriction in a Sri Lankan study population
    de Silva, R.
    Perera, H.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 12 - 12
  • [40] Are Fetal and Neonatal Growth Curves Different in Predicting the Impact of Intrauterine Growth Restriction on Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity?
    W Zaw
    R Gagnon
    V Capewell
    O P da Silva
    Pediatric Research, 1999, 45 (7) : 260 - 260