Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Weinstein, Marc A. [1 ,2 ]
Ayala, Giovanni A. [3 ]
Roura, Raul [3 ]
Christmas, Kaitlyn N. [3 ]
Warren, Deborah H. [3 ]
Simon, Peter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Morsani Sch Med, 13330 USF Laurel Dr, Tampa, FL USA
[2] Florida Orthopaed Inst, 13020 Telecom Prkw N, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Fdn Orthopaed Res & Educ, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607 USA
来源
关键词
Expandable cage; TLIF; Lumbar interbody fusion; Radiographic parameters; Back pain; Lumbar lordosis; Segmental lordosis; CAGE; LORDOSIS; SUBSIDENCE; RESTORATION; TECHNOLOGY; SPACERS; DISTRACTION; DISABILITY; ANTERIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of interbody cages as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusion remains an important technique to enhance segmental stability, promote solid arthrodesis, maintain neuroforaminal decompression, and preserve/improve segmental lordosis. Appropriate segmental lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance is well-known to be critical for long-term patient outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of TLIF in patients using an articulating, expandable cage. Primary endpoint was clinical and radiographic outcomes, including complications, at 12 and 24 months. Methods: A total of 37 patients underwent open single-level or 2-level TLIF by a single surgeon using an expandable cage with concomitant bilateral pedicle screws and posterolateral arthrodesis. Clinical outcomes included ODI and VAS for back and legs. Radiographic outcomes included pelvic incidence and tilt, lumbar and segmental lordoses, and disc height at the operative level(s). All outcomes were collected at baseline, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postop. Results: A total of 28 patients were available for analysis. Nine patients failed to follow-up at 24 months. Mean ODI scores showed significant improvement, from pre-to-postoperative at 24 months (55%; p<.0001). VAS for back and legs was significantly lower at 24 months on average by 72 and 79%, respectively (p<.0001 for both). Both segmental and lumbar lordoses significantly improved by 5.3 degrees and 4.2 degrees (p<.0001 and p=.049), respectively. Average disc height improved by 49% or 6.1 mm (p<.001). No device-related complications nor instances of measured subsidence. One patient had a superficial infection, and another had an intraoperatively repaired incidental durotomy. Conclusions: The use of an expandable cage contributed to improvement in both segmental and lumbar lordosis with no reported complications at 24-month follow-up. All clinical measures significantly improved as well. The expandable cage design represents an effective and safe option to increase cage size and allow significant segmental lordosis correction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Expandable Interbody Spacers Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Study
    Kim, Choll
    Cohen, Dan S.
    Smith, Mark D.
    Dix, Gary A.
    Luna, Ingrid Y.
    Joshua, Gita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (04): : 518 - 526
  • [2] Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis
    Massie, Lara W.
    Zakaria, Hesham Mostafa
    Schultz, Lonni R.
    Basheer, Azam
    Buraimoh, Morenikeji Ayodele
    Chang, Victor
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (01)
  • [3] Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ledesma, Jonathan Andrew
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Dees, Azra
    Thomas, Terence
    Hiranaka, Cannon Greco
    Kurd, Mark Faisal
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Anderson, David Greg
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [4] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Two-Year Results with a Modular Interbody Device
    Jackson, Keith Lynn
    Yeoman, Chevas
    Chung, Woosik M.
    Chappuis, James L.
    Freedman, Brett
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (05) : 591 - 598
  • [5] Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Osteoporosis
    Formby, Peter M.
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Helgeson, Melvin D.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (07) : 660 - 664
  • [6] Comparative Effectiveness of Adjustable Lordotic Expandable Versus Static Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Li, Yan M.
    Frisch, Richard F.
    Huang, Zheng
    Towner, James
    Li, Yan Icy
    Riggleman, Jessica
    Ledonio, Charles
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 173 - 173
  • [7] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E627 - E638
  • [8] Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Titanium Cage Through Kambin's Triangle Without Facetectomy
    Tabarestani, Troy Q.
    Wang, Timothy Y.
    Sykes, David A. W.
    Mehta, Vikram A.
    Yang, Lexie Z.
    Chow, Shein-Chung
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Wiggins, Walter F.
    Chi, John H.
    Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (06): : 760 - 770
  • [9] Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Chang, Chih-Chang
    Chou, Dean
    Pennicooke, Brenton
    Rivera, Joshua
    Tan, Lee A.
    Berven, Sigurd
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 34 (03) : 471 - 480
  • [10] Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices
    McMordie, Joseph H.
    Schmidt, Kyle P.
    Gard, Andrew P.
    Gillis, Christopher C.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 86 (02) : E147 - E155