Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Weinstein, Marc A. [1 ,2 ]
Ayala, Giovanni A. [3 ]
Roura, Raul [3 ]
Christmas, Kaitlyn N. [3 ]
Warren, Deborah H. [3 ]
Simon, Peter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Morsani Sch Med, 13330 USF Laurel Dr, Tampa, FL USA
[2] Florida Orthopaed Inst, 13020 Telecom Prkw N, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Fdn Orthopaed Res & Educ, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607 USA
来源
关键词
Expandable cage; TLIF; Lumbar interbody fusion; Radiographic parameters; Back pain; Lumbar lordosis; Segmental lordosis; CAGE; LORDOSIS; SUBSIDENCE; RESTORATION; TECHNOLOGY; SPACERS; DISTRACTION; DISABILITY; ANTERIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of interbody cages as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusion remains an important technique to enhance segmental stability, promote solid arthrodesis, maintain neuroforaminal decompression, and preserve/improve segmental lordosis. Appropriate segmental lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance is well-known to be critical for long-term patient outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of TLIF in patients using an articulating, expandable cage. Primary endpoint was clinical and radiographic outcomes, including complications, at 12 and 24 months. Methods: A total of 37 patients underwent open single-level or 2-level TLIF by a single surgeon using an expandable cage with concomitant bilateral pedicle screws and posterolateral arthrodesis. Clinical outcomes included ODI and VAS for back and legs. Radiographic outcomes included pelvic incidence and tilt, lumbar and segmental lordoses, and disc height at the operative level(s). All outcomes were collected at baseline, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postop. Results: A total of 28 patients were available for analysis. Nine patients failed to follow-up at 24 months. Mean ODI scores showed significant improvement, from pre-to-postoperative at 24 months (55%; p<.0001). VAS for back and legs was significantly lower at 24 months on average by 72 and 79%, respectively (p<.0001 for both). Both segmental and lumbar lordoses significantly improved by 5.3 degrees and 4.2 degrees (p<.0001 and p=.049), respectively. Average disc height improved by 49% or 6.1 mm (p<.001). No device-related complications nor instances of measured subsidence. One patient had a superficial infection, and another had an intraoperatively repaired incidental durotomy. Conclusions: The use of an expandable cage contributed to improvement in both segmental and lumbar lordosis with no reported complications at 24-month follow-up. All clinical measures significantly improved as well. The expandable cage design represents an effective and safe option to increase cage size and allow significant segmental lordosis correction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Arvind G. Kulkarni
    Hussain Bohra
    Abhilash Dhruv
    Abhishek Sarraf
    Anupreet Bassi
    Vishwanath M. Patil
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 : 464 - 472
  • [32] Outcomes of extended transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis
    Talia, Adrian J.
    Wong, Michael L.
    Lau, Hui C.
    Kaye, Andrew H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (11) : 1762 - 1770
  • [33] Expandable vs Static Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic Comparison of Segmental and Lumbar Sagittal Angles
    Yee, Timothy J.
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Terman, Samuel W.
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (01) : 69 - 74
  • [34] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Fischer, Gustav
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Wu, Wentien
    Faundez, Antonio
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 120 - 125
  • [35] Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Tan, Lee A.
    Rivera, Joshua
    Tan, Xiao A.
    Le, Vivian P.
    Khoo, Larry T.
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 : S39 - S44
  • [36] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of hybrid graft in patients with Modic changes undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Jiaxun Jiao
    Jiaqi Li
    Yun Luo
    Wei Zhang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16
  • [37] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of hybrid graft in patients with Modic changes undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Jiao, Jiaxun
    Li, Jiaqi
    Luo, Yun
    Zhang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [38] Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Dibble, Christopher F.
    Stecher, Priscilla
    Dorward, Ian
    Hawasli, Ammar H.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 19 (05) : 518 - 528
  • [39] Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases
    Tian Y.
    Liu X.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (7) : 745 - 751
  • [40] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters
    Hawasli, Ammar H.
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Chatrath, Ajay
    Yarbrough, Chester K.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2017, 43 (02)