The social licence of salmon aquaculture in Tasmania: Fulfilling the social bargain

被引:0
|
作者
Buckwell, Andrew [1 ,3 ]
Hasan, Syezlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Knight, Alana [1 ,3 ]
Fleming, Christopher [1 ]
Harte, Jeremy [2 ,3 ]
Smart, James C. R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Blue Econ Cooperat Res Ctr, Launceston, Tas, Australia
关键词
Aquaculture; Blue economy; Q; -methodology; Social licence to operate; OPERATE; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; AUSTRALIA; DEFINITIONS; COMMUNITY; CONTRACT; INDUSTRY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106653
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Salmon aquaculture is one of a number of industries in Tasmania that can benefit from new technologies to reduce the local ecological and community amenity impacts of its coastal operations. This may assist the industry in retaining its social licence to operate (SLO), which is currently in question, so that it can continue generating benefits for local livelihoods. We used Q-methodology to gain empirical insight into aquaculture stakeholder perspectives on the role that SLO plays in maintaining the industry's legitimacy. Results revealed four factors, all of which saw genuine engagement with strategies to retain SLO as being fundamental to the industry's future. Whilst three factors prioritised the economic and employment benefits of the industry as playing an important role in this-as part of a social bargain with the community-all four factors believed that the continued legitimacy of the industry requires broader civil society consent. One factor considered the industry as being under pressure, but nevertheless felt a SLO could be re-established if the industry followed certain steps to secure it. Our research demonstrates that salmon aquaculture would do well to continue to actively seek SLO, achievement of which will maximise total net social benefit and point to pathways that begin to incorporate the nature-positive and people-positive agendas. It should also consider engagement with both communities of place and communities of practice as it explores opportunities in the blue economy and recognise that disclosure and transparency will assist in demonstrating procedural fairness.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regulation and the social licence for medical research
    Mary Dixon-Woods
    Richard E. Ashcroft
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2008, 11 : 381 - 391
  • [32] A SOCIAL LICENCE TO MINE OIL SHALE
    Pensa, Margus
    OIL SHALE, 2014, 31 (02) : 103 - 104
  • [33] Social Licence to Irrigate: The Boundary Problem
    Shepheard, Mark L.
    Martin, Paul V.
    SOCIAL ALTERNATIVES, 2008, 27 (03) : 32 - 39
  • [34] Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO)
    Hurst, Bree
    Johnston, Kim A.
    Lane, Anne B.
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2020, 46 (04)
  • [35] The Language of Science and Social Licence to Operate
    Gallois, Cindy
    Ashworth, Peta
    Leach, Joan
    Moffat, Kieren
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 36 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [36] The social licence to operate: a critical review
    Moffat, Kieren
    Lacey, Justine
    Zhang, Airong
    Leipold, Sina
    FORESTRY, 2016, 89 (05): : 477 - 488
  • [37] Community engagement and social licence to operate
    Dare, Melanie
    Schirmer, Jacki
    Vanclay, Frank
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2014, 32 (03) : 188 - 197
  • [38] Regulation and the social licence for medical research
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Ashcroft, Richard E.
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2008, 11 (04) : 381 - 391
  • [39] Legislation, social licence and primate research
    Olsson, I. Anna S.
    Vitale, Augusto
    EMBO REPORTS, 2010, 11 (01) : 9 - 9
  • [40] Social Licence for Marine Conservation Science
    Kelly, Rachel
    Fleming, Aysha
    Pecl, Gretta T.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 5