The social licence of salmon aquaculture in Tasmania: Fulfilling the social bargain

被引:0
|
作者
Buckwell, Andrew [1 ,3 ]
Hasan, Syezlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Knight, Alana [1 ,3 ]
Fleming, Christopher [1 ]
Harte, Jeremy [2 ,3 ]
Smart, James C. R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Blue Econ Cooperat Res Ctr, Launceston, Tas, Australia
关键词
Aquaculture; Blue economy; Q; -methodology; Social licence to operate; OPERATE; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; AUSTRALIA; DEFINITIONS; COMMUNITY; CONTRACT; INDUSTRY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106653
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Salmon aquaculture is one of a number of industries in Tasmania that can benefit from new technologies to reduce the local ecological and community amenity impacts of its coastal operations. This may assist the industry in retaining its social licence to operate (SLO), which is currently in question, so that it can continue generating benefits for local livelihoods. We used Q-methodology to gain empirical insight into aquaculture stakeholder perspectives on the role that SLO plays in maintaining the industry's legitimacy. Results revealed four factors, all of which saw genuine engagement with strategies to retain SLO as being fundamental to the industry's future. Whilst three factors prioritised the economic and employment benefits of the industry as playing an important role in this-as part of a social bargain with the community-all four factors believed that the continued legitimacy of the industry requires broader civil society consent. One factor considered the industry as being under pressure, but nevertheless felt a SLO could be re-established if the industry followed certain steps to secure it. Our research demonstrates that salmon aquaculture would do well to continue to actively seek SLO, achievement of which will maximise total net social benefit and point to pathways that begin to incorporate the nature-positive and people-positive agendas. It should also consider engagement with both communities of place and communities of practice as it explores opportunities in the blue economy and recognise that disclosure and transparency will assist in demonstrating procedural fairness.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fulfilling Social and Economic Rights
    Hunt, Paul
    MEDICAL LAW REVIEW, 2017, 25 (02) : 355 - 360
  • [22] Survey data on public perceptions of salmon aquaculture industry in Norway, Tasmania, and Iceland
    Olsen, Marit Schei
    Mikkelsen, Eirik
    Alexander, Karen A.
    Thorarinsdottir, Ragnheidur
    Osmundsen, Tonje C.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2024, 53
  • [23] 'No one has even seen ... smelt ... or sensed a social licence': Animal geographies and social licence to operate
    Duncan, Elizabeth
    Graham, Raewyn
    McManus, Phil
    GEOFORUM, 2018, 96 : 318 - 327
  • [24] Fish transport in the aquaculture sector: An overview of the road transport of Atlantic salmon in Tasmania
    King, Henry R.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2009, 4 (04) : 163 - 168
  • [25] Narratives and networks model of the social licence
    Boutilier, Robert G.
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69
  • [26] Social development will not deliver social licence to operate for the extractive sector
    Harvey, Bruce
    EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2014, 1 (01): : 7 - 11
  • [27] Social licence to operate and forestry - an introduction
    Edwards, Peter
    Lacey, Justine
    Wyatt, Stephen
    Williams, Kathryn J. H.
    FORESTRY, 2016, 89 (05): : 473 - 476
  • [28] Licence to lie and the social (In)appropriateness of lying
    Serdarevic, Nina
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 199
  • [29] Social licence and mining: A critical perspective
    Owen, John R.
    Kemp, Deanna
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2013, 38 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [30] Unexplored aspects of the social licence for SMEs
    Lynch-Wood, Gary
    Williamson, David
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2015, 15 (05): : 577 - 589