The social licence of salmon aquaculture in Tasmania: Fulfilling the social bargain

被引:0
|
作者
Buckwell, Andrew [1 ,3 ]
Hasan, Syezlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Knight, Alana [1 ,3 ]
Fleming, Christopher [1 ]
Harte, Jeremy [2 ,3 ]
Smart, James C. R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Blue Econ Cooperat Res Ctr, Launceston, Tas, Australia
关键词
Aquaculture; Blue economy; Q; -methodology; Social licence to operate; OPERATE; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; AUSTRALIA; DEFINITIONS; COMMUNITY; CONTRACT; INDUSTRY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106653
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Salmon aquaculture is one of a number of industries in Tasmania that can benefit from new technologies to reduce the local ecological and community amenity impacts of its coastal operations. This may assist the industry in retaining its social licence to operate (SLO), which is currently in question, so that it can continue generating benefits for local livelihoods. We used Q-methodology to gain empirical insight into aquaculture stakeholder perspectives on the role that SLO plays in maintaining the industry's legitimacy. Results revealed four factors, all of which saw genuine engagement with strategies to retain SLO as being fundamental to the industry's future. Whilst three factors prioritised the economic and employment benefits of the industry as playing an important role in this-as part of a social bargain with the community-all four factors believed that the continued legitimacy of the industry requires broader civil society consent. One factor considered the industry as being under pressure, but nevertheless felt a SLO could be re-established if the industry followed certain steps to secure it. Our research demonstrates that salmon aquaculture would do well to continue to actively seek SLO, achievement of which will maximise total net social benefit and point to pathways that begin to incorporate the nature-positive and people-positive agendas. It should also consider engagement with both communities of place and communities of practice as it explores opportunities in the blue economy and recognise that disclosure and transparency will assist in demonstrating procedural fairness.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social licence and aquaculture: Towards a research agenda
    Mather, Charles
    Fanning, Lucia
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 99 : 275 - 282
  • [2] A social license to operate for aquaculture: Reflections from Tasmania
    Alexander, Karen A.
    AQUACULTURE, 2022, 550
  • [3] Science and Social License: Defining Environmental Sustainability of Atlantic Salmon Aquaculture in South-Eastern Tasmania, Australia
    Leith, Peat
    Ogier, Emily
    Haward, Marcus
    SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2014, 28 (3-4) : 277 - 296
  • [4] A social license to operate for aquaculture in Tasmania: The importance of theory-testing
    Alexander, Karen A.
    AQUACULTURE, 2025, 595
  • [5] The role of relationships in achieving and maintaining a social licence in the New Zealand aquaculture sector
    Baines, James
    Edwards, Peter
    AQUACULTURE, 2018, 485 : 140 - 146
  • [6] The Rebirth of Social Licence
    van de Biezenbos, Kristen
    MCGILL INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LAW AND POLICY, 2019, 14 (02) : 153 - 185
  • [7] Measuring social licence: What and who determines public acceptability of aquaculture in New Zealand?
    Sinner, Jim
    Newton, Mark
    Barclay, Jaye
    Baines, James
    Farrelly, Trisia
    Edwards, Peter
    Tipa, Gail
    AQUACULTURE, 2020, 521
  • [8] Social licence in New Zealandwhat is it?
    Edwards, P.
    Trafford, S.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND, 2016, 46 (3-4) : 165 - 180
  • [9] A social licence for the sharing economy
    Baumber, Alex
    Scerri, Moira
    Schweinsberg, Stephen
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 146 : 12 - 23
  • [10] Obtaining a social licence for MPAs - influences on social acceptability
    Voyer, Michelle
    Gladstone, William
    Goodall, Heather
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 51 : 260 - 266