Patient-Reported Outcomes and Aesthetic Evaluations in Autologous Breast Reconstruction at Taipei Veterans General Hospital

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Qi-Rui [1 ]
Feng, Chin-Jung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hsiao, Fu-Yin [1 ]
Tseng, Ling-Ming [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, Chi-Cheng [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Tsai, Yi-Fang [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Yen-Shu [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Shyh-Jen [6 ,7 ]
Yu, Wen-Chan [6 ]
Perng, Cherng-Kang [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 201,Sec 2,Shipai Rd, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Comprehens Breast Hlth Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Rehabil & Tech Aids Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Expt Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Chang Bing Show Chwan Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
关键词
breast reconstruction; BREAST-Q; BCCT.core; aesthetic outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIATION-THERAPY; MASTECTOMY; FLAP; RADIOTHERAPY; BCCT.CORE; CANCER; WOMEN; TRAM;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000004201
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundImproving the quality of life increases patients' expectations of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Increased incidence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma encourages patients to choose autologous breast reconstruction over implantation. This study aimed to analyze the aesthetic outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction and define factors associated with the results.MethodsWe recruited patients for immediate or delayed autologous tissue reconstruction after mastectomy from October 2015 to June 2021 at a single institute in Taiwan. Patient demographic data, operative complications, and secondary cosmetic revisions were identified through a medical chart review. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and perioperative imaging records were analyzed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire and Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment (BCCT).core, respectively, for aesthetic outcome evaluations.ResultsEighty-three women were enrolled, with a 73% BREAST-Q questionnaire response rate, and followed-up for a mean 36 (6-78) months. The mean BREAST-Q score for satisfaction with breasts was 60.46 (standard deviation = 19.09). The postoperative BCCT.core evaluation did not differ significantly from the preoperative evaluation (P = 0.245), and most patients (70.59%) reported similar (50%) or better results (20.59%) after reconstruction. Postmastectomy radiotherapy impacted negatively on psychosocial well-being (P = 0.012), sexual well-being (P = 0.002), and satisfaction with breast (P = 0.026). Three-dimensional breast molds might improve psychosocial well-being BREAST-Q scores, sexual well-being, and breast satisfaction but was not statistically significant.ConclusionsBreast reconstruction with autologous tissue had an acceptable complication rate and favorable aesthetic outcomes in PROs and BCCT.core. Postmastectomy radiotherapy resulted in worse PROs and a 3-dimensional breast mold may facilitate better outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:S44 / S51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Hazan, Jessica
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (06) : 882E - 890E
  • [32] Optimizing DIEP Flap Insetting for Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcomes
    Razzano, Sergio
    Marongiu, Francesco
    Wade, Ryckie
    Figus, Andrea
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (02) : 261E - 270E
  • [33] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer
    Tevis, Sarah E.
    James, Ted A.
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Yao, Katharine A.
    Merlino, James
    Dietz, Jill
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 2839 - 2845
  • [34] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer
    Sarah E. Tevis
    Ted A. James
    Henry M. Kuerer
    Andrea L. Pusic
    Katharine A. Yao
    James Merlino
    Jill Dietz
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2839 - 2845
  • [35] Reply: Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Failed Implant-Based Reconstruction: Evaluation of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Coriddi, Michelle
    Disa, Joseph J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (05) : 932E - 933E
  • [36] Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Autologous versus Implant-Based Reconstruction following Infected Breast Device Explantation
    Asaad, Malke
    Slovacek, Cedar
    Mitchell, David
    Liu, Jun
    Selber, Jesse C.
    Clemens, Mark W.
    Chu, Carrie K.
    Mericli, Alexander F.
    Butler, Charles E.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 149 (06) : 1080E - 1089E
  • [37] Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Autologous versus Implant-Based Reconstruction following Infected Breast Device Explantation
    Zhang, Ziying
    Xin, Minqiang
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (04)
  • [38] Multicentre study of patient-reported and clinical outcomes following immediate and delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction And Radiotherapy (ABRAR study)
    Steele, Kathryn H.
    Macmillan, R. Douglas
    Ball, Graham R.
    Akerlund, Malin
    McCulley, Stephen J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (02): : 185 - 193
  • [39] Patient-Reported Outcomes after Syndactyly Reconstruction
    Geoghegan, Luke
    Harrison, Conrad
    Singh, Gurdas V.
    Wormald, Justin C. R.
    Rodrigues, Jeremy N.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (01) : 168E - 169E
  • [40] Patient-Reported Outcomes after Syndactyly Reconstruction
    Park, Eugene
    Bi, Andrew
    King, Erik C.
    Adkinson, Joshua M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (05) : 1215 - 1221