Patient-Reported Outcomes and Aesthetic Evaluations in Autologous Breast Reconstruction at Taipei Veterans General Hospital

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Qi-Rui [1 ]
Feng, Chin-Jung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hsiao, Fu-Yin [1 ]
Tseng, Ling-Ming [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, Chi-Cheng [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Tsai, Yi-Fang [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Yen-Shu [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Shyh-Jen [6 ,7 ]
Yu, Wen-Chan [6 ]
Perng, Cherng-Kang [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 201,Sec 2,Shipai Rd, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Comprehens Breast Hlth Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Rehabil & Tech Aids Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Expt Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Chang Bing Show Chwan Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
关键词
breast reconstruction; BREAST-Q; BCCT.core; aesthetic outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIATION-THERAPY; MASTECTOMY; FLAP; RADIOTHERAPY; BCCT.CORE; CANCER; WOMEN; TRAM;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000004201
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundImproving the quality of life increases patients' expectations of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Increased incidence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma encourages patients to choose autologous breast reconstruction over implantation. This study aimed to analyze the aesthetic outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction and define factors associated with the results.MethodsWe recruited patients for immediate or delayed autologous tissue reconstruction after mastectomy from October 2015 to June 2021 at a single institute in Taiwan. Patient demographic data, operative complications, and secondary cosmetic revisions were identified through a medical chart review. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and perioperative imaging records were analyzed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire and Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment (BCCT).core, respectively, for aesthetic outcome evaluations.ResultsEighty-three women were enrolled, with a 73% BREAST-Q questionnaire response rate, and followed-up for a mean 36 (6-78) months. The mean BREAST-Q score for satisfaction with breasts was 60.46 (standard deviation = 19.09). The postoperative BCCT.core evaluation did not differ significantly from the preoperative evaluation (P = 0.245), and most patients (70.59%) reported similar (50%) or better results (20.59%) after reconstruction. Postmastectomy radiotherapy impacted negatively on psychosocial well-being (P = 0.012), sexual well-being (P = 0.002), and satisfaction with breast (P = 0.026). Three-dimensional breast molds might improve psychosocial well-being BREAST-Q scores, sexual well-being, and breast satisfaction but was not statistically significant.ConclusionsBreast reconstruction with autologous tissue had an acceptable complication rate and favorable aesthetic outcomes in PROs and BCCT.core. Postmastectomy radiotherapy resulted in worse PROs and a 3-dimensional breast mold may facilitate better outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:S44 / S51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hospital Variations in Clinical Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Berlin, Nicholas L.
    Tandon, Vickram J.
    Qi, Ji
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Momoh, Adeyiza O.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (05) : 959 - 965
  • [22] Patient-Reported Aesthetic and Psychosocial Outcomes After Microvascular Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer
    Zebolsky, Aaron L.
    Patel, Neil
    Heaton, Chase M.
    Park, Andrea M.
    Seth, Rahul
    Knott, P. Daniel
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2021, 147 (12) : 1035 - 1044
  • [23] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Clara
    Sunu, Christine
    Pignone, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [24] Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Santosa, Katherine B.
    Qi, Ji
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (10) : 891 - 899
  • [25] Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Momoh, Adeyiza O.
    Qi, Ji
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Billig, Jessica
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 110 (02): : 157 - 165
  • [26] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Does the Quality of Decisions Matter?
    Shibani R. Chettri
    Michael P. Pignone
    Allison M. Deal
    Karen R. Sepucha
    Lillian B. Blizard
    Ruth Huh
    Yuen-Jong Liu
    Peter A. Ubel
    Clara N. Lee
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 (3) : 1891 - 1900
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Does the Quality of Decisions Matter?
    Chettri, Shibani R.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Deal, Allison M.
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    Blizard, Lillian B.
    Huh, Ruth
    Liu, Yuen-Jong
    Ubel, Peter A.
    Lee, Clara N.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (03) : 1891 - 1900
  • [28] Association of Fat Grafting With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Bennett, Katelyn G.
    Qi, Ji
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Kozlow, Jeffrey H.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (10) : 944 - 950
  • [29] Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study
    Wang, Yi
    Li, Guangxue
    Yang, Kai
    Bi, Ye
    Liu, Yan
    Mu, Dali
    Liu, Chunjun
    Xin, Minqiang
    Liu, Yuanbo
    Mu, Lan
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (5S) : S120 - S124
  • [30] Effects of Elective Revision after Breast Reconstruction on Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Zong, Amanda M.
    Leibl, Kayla E.
    Weichman, Katie E.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2025, 41 (02) : 100 - 112