IMPACT OF PREPROCESSING AND COMPARISON OF NEURAL NETWORK ENSEMBLE METHODS FOR SEGMENTATION OF THE THORACIC SPINE IN X-RAY IMAGES

被引:0
|
作者
Koniukhov, V. D. [1 ]
Morgun, O. M. [2 ]
Nemchenko, K. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] NAS Ukraine, A Pidhornyi Inst Power Machines & Syst, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[2] Lab Xray Med Equipment LTD, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[3] Kharkov Natl Univ, Kharkiv, Ukraine
关键词
machine learning; image recognition; neural network; image segmentation; computer vision;
D O I
10.15588/1607-3274-2024-4-10
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context. Automatic segmentation of medical images plays an important role in the process of automating the detection of various diseases in the spine and the use of radiography is the most accessible means of predicting diseases. Over the years many studies have been conducted on the topic of image segmentation. One of the many methods for improving image segmentation is the use of neural network ensembles. Objective. The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of preprocessing and compare the main methods of neural network ensembles and their effect on the segmentation of the thoracic region, in this study the area was considered which consists of Method. To begin with, the influence of preprocessing of X-ray images was considered, which included the following methods: histogram equalization for contrast enhancement, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization, logarithmic transform method, median filter, Gaussian filter, and bilateral filter. To study the influence of neural network ensemble on segmentation quality, several methods were used. Averaging method - a simple half-averaging method. Weighted averaging method - an improved version of the averaging method which uses weights for each network, the higher the network weight, the greater its influence on averaging. Method of cumulative averaging - a modified averaging method in which each ensemble receives an averaged image, after which all the results of the ensembles are averaged. Bagging - method of averaging networks trained on different data, n networks are used, the training sample is divided into n parts, and each neural network is trained on its own subset of data, as a result, the averaging method is used for predictions. Averaging method for a large number of networks - in this method, 100 neural networks were trained, after which the averaging method was used. Method of averaging mask shapes - this method uses a distance transform to average multiple masks into one shape average. Results. It was investigated that the use of different methods of image preprocessing does not guarantee an improvement in the quality of segmentation of the spine region on X-ray images, but even on the contrary worsens the quality of segmentation. Different methods of combining predictions of neural network ensembles were considered, which made it possible to find out the pros and cons of specific methods for the task of segmentation of X-ray images. Conclusions. The experiments conducted allowed us to conclude that the use of any preprocessing methods should not be used for segmentation of X-ray images. Also, due to a large number of architectures and methods for combining predictions, the behavior of ensemble methods was studied, which will allow us to further determine the necessary approach for segmentation of X-ray images. Further study of the weighted averaging method and the mask shape averaging method will make it possible to improve the obtained result and achieve even greater success in segmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 112
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Segmentation of X-ray Images Mechanical Computation
    Amza, Catalin Gheorghe
    Grigoriu, Mircea
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH IASME/WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTINUUM MECHANICS: RECENT ADVANCES IN CONTINUUM MECHANICS, 2009, : 23 - +
  • [42] Lightweight convolutional neural network for chest X-ray images classification
    Yen, Chih-Ta
    Tsao, Chia-Yu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [43] Ways of Building a Neural Network for the Binary Classification of X-ray Images
    Minyazev R.S.
    Rumyantsev A.A.
    Baev A.A.
    Baeva T.D.
    Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics, 2020, 84 (12) : 1497 - 1501
  • [44] Detection of Scoliosis in X-Ray Images Using a Convolutional Neural Network
    Salazar-Fierro, Fausto
    Cumbal, Carlos
    Trejo-Espana, Diego
    Leon-Fernandez, Cayo
    Pusda-Chulde, Marco
    Garcia-Santilllan, Ivan
    TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION, CITI 2024, 2025, 2276 : 167 - 183
  • [45] BiLuNet: A Multi-path Network for Semantic Segmentation on X-ray Images
    Van Luan Tran
    Lin, Huei-Yung
    Liu, Hsiao-Wei
    Jang, Fang-Jie
    Tseng, Chun-Han
    2020 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2021, : 10034 - 10041
  • [46] Automatic COVID-19 detection from X-ray images using ensemble learning with convolutional neural network
    Amit Kumar Das
    Sayantani Ghosh
    Samiruddin Thunder
    Rohit Dutta
    Sachin Agarwal
    Amlan Chakrabarti
    Pattern Analysis and Applications, 2021, 24 : 1111 - 1124
  • [47] The measurement of Cobb angle based on spine X-ray images using multi-scale convolutional neural network
    Jun Liu
    Chen Yuan
    Xiaoxue Sun
    Lechan Sun
    Hua Dong
    Yun Peng
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2021, 44 : 809 - 821
  • [48] Automated COVID-19 detection from X-ray and CT images with stacked ensemble convolutional neural network
    Gour, Mahesh
    Jain, Stueta
    BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 42 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [49] Automatic COVID-19 detection from X-ray images using ensemble learning with convolutional neural network
    Das, Amit Kumar
    Ghosh, Sayantani
    Thunder, Samiruddin
    Dutta, Rohit
    Agarwal, Sachin
    Chakrabarti, Amlan
    PATTERN ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 24 (03) : 1111 - 1124
  • [50] The measurement of Cobb angle based on spine X-ray images using multi-scale convolutional neural network
    Liu, Jun
    Yuan, Chen
    Sun, Xiaoxue
    Sun, Lechan
    Dong, Hua
    Peng, Yun
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2021, 44 (03) : 809 - 821