IMPACT OF PREPROCESSING AND COMPARISON OF NEURAL NETWORK ENSEMBLE METHODS FOR SEGMENTATION OF THE THORACIC SPINE IN X-RAY IMAGES

被引:0
|
作者
Koniukhov, V. D. [1 ]
Morgun, O. M. [2 ]
Nemchenko, K. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] NAS Ukraine, A Pidhornyi Inst Power Machines & Syst, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[2] Lab Xray Med Equipment LTD, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[3] Kharkov Natl Univ, Kharkiv, Ukraine
关键词
machine learning; image recognition; neural network; image segmentation; computer vision;
D O I
10.15588/1607-3274-2024-4-10
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context. Automatic segmentation of medical images plays an important role in the process of automating the detection of various diseases in the spine and the use of radiography is the most accessible means of predicting diseases. Over the years many studies have been conducted on the topic of image segmentation. One of the many methods for improving image segmentation is the use of neural network ensembles. Objective. The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of preprocessing and compare the main methods of neural network ensembles and their effect on the segmentation of the thoracic region, in this study the area was considered which consists of Method. To begin with, the influence of preprocessing of X-ray images was considered, which included the following methods: histogram equalization for contrast enhancement, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization, logarithmic transform method, median filter, Gaussian filter, and bilateral filter. To study the influence of neural network ensemble on segmentation quality, several methods were used. Averaging method - a simple half-averaging method. Weighted averaging method - an improved version of the averaging method which uses weights for each network, the higher the network weight, the greater its influence on averaging. Method of cumulative averaging - a modified averaging method in which each ensemble receives an averaged image, after which all the results of the ensembles are averaged. Bagging - method of averaging networks trained on different data, n networks are used, the training sample is divided into n parts, and each neural network is trained on its own subset of data, as a result, the averaging method is used for predictions. Averaging method for a large number of networks - in this method, 100 neural networks were trained, after which the averaging method was used. Method of averaging mask shapes - this method uses a distance transform to average multiple masks into one shape average. Results. It was investigated that the use of different methods of image preprocessing does not guarantee an improvement in the quality of segmentation of the spine region on X-ray images, but even on the contrary worsens the quality of segmentation. Different methods of combining predictions of neural network ensembles were considered, which made it possible to find out the pros and cons of specific methods for the task of segmentation of X-ray images. Conclusions. The experiments conducted allowed us to conclude that the use of any preprocessing methods should not be used for segmentation of X-ray images. Also, due to a large number of architectures and methods for combining predictions, the behavior of ensemble methods was studied, which will allow us to further determine the necessary approach for segmentation of X-ray images. Further study of the weighted averaging method and the mask shape averaging method will make it possible to improve the obtained result and achieve even greater success in segmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 112
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Teeth segmentation and carious lesions segmentation in panoramic X-ray images using CariSeg, a networks' ensemble
    Marginean, Andra Carmen
    Muresanu, Sorana
    Hedesiu, Mihaela
    Diosan, Laura
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (10)
  • [32] The impact of implementing backbone architectures on fracture segmentation in X-ray images
    Turk, Salih
    Bingol, Ozkan
    Coskuncay, Ahmet
    Aydin, Tolga
    ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL-JESTECH, 2024, 59
  • [33] A Comparison of Image Enhancement Methods for Lumbar Spine X-ray Image
    Saenpaen, Jennarong
    Arwatchananukul, Sujitra
    Aunsri, Nattapol
    2018 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING/ELECTRONICS, COMPUTER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ECTI-CON), 2018, : 798 - 801
  • [34] Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network-Based Spine Model Positioning of X-Ray Images
    Zhang, Le
    Zhang, Jiabao
    Gao, Song
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [35] Deep Neural Network for Lung Image Segmentation on Chest X-ray
    Chavan, Mahesh
    Varadarajan, Vijayakumar
    Gite, Shilpa
    Kotecha, Ketan
    TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [36] AngioNet: a convolutional neural network for vessel segmentation in X-ray angiography
    Kritika Iyer
    Cyrus P. Najarian
    Aya A. Fattah
    Christopher J. Arthurs
    S. M. Reza Soroushmehr
    Vijayakumar Subban
    Mullasari A. Sankardas
    Raj R. Nadakuditi
    Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
    C. Alberto Figueroa
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [37] AngioNet: a convolutional neural network for vessel segmentation in X-ray angiography
    Iyer, Kritika
    Najarian, Cyrus P.
    Fattah, Aya A.
    Arthurs, Christopher J.
    Soroushmehr, S. M. Reza
    Subban, Vijayakumar
    Sankardas, Mullasari A.
    Nadakuditi, Raj R.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Figueroa, C. Alberto
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [38] Automatic Teeth Segmentation in Panoramic X-Ray Images Using a Coupled Shape Model in Combination with a Neural Network
    Wirtz, Andreas
    Mirashi, Sudesh Ganapati
    Wesarg, Stefan
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2018, PT IV, 2018, 11073 : 712 - 719
  • [39] Evaluation of different segmentation methods of X-ray micro computed tomography images
    Bollmann, Sebastian
    Kleinebudde, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 606
  • [40] Fuzzy segmentation of X-ray fluoroscopy images
    Russakoff, DB
    Rohlfing, T
    Maurer, CR
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1-3, 2002, 4684 : 146 - 154