Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer Among Men With Limited Longevity in the Active Surveillance Era

被引:2
|
作者
Daskivich, Timothy J. [1 ]
Luu, Michael [2 ]
Heard, John [1 ]
Thomas, I-Chun [3 ]
Leppert, John T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 8635 W Third St,Ste 1070W, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA USA
[4] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Div Urol, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
POPULATION-BASED COHORT; LIFE EXPECTANCY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; COMORBIDITY; GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5994
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Men with limited life expectancy (LE) have historically been overtreated for prostate cancer despite clear guideline recommendations. With increasing use of active surveillance, it is unclear if overtreatment of men with limited LE has persisted and how overtreatment varies by tumor risk and treatment type. Objective To determine if rates of overtreatment of men with limited LE have persisted in the active surveillance era and whether overtreatment varies by tumor risk or treatment type. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included men with clinically localized prostate cancer in the Veterans Affairs health system who received a diagnosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures LE was estimated using the validated age-adjusted Prostate Cancer Comorbidity Index (PCCI). Treatment trends among men with limited LE were assessed using a stratified linear and log-linear Poisson regression in aggregate and across PCCI and tumor risk subgroups. Results The mean (SD) age for the study population of 243 928 men was 66.8 (8.0) years. A total of 50 045 (20.5%) and 11 366 (4.7%) men had an LE of less than 10 years and LE of less than 5 years based on PCCI scores of 5 or greater and 10 or greater, respectively. Among men with an LE of less than 10 years, the proportion of men treated with definitive treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) for low-risk disease decreased from 37.4% to 14.7% (absolute change, -22.7%; 95% CI, -30.0% to -15.4%) but increased for intermediate-risk disease from 37.6% to 59.8% (22.1%; 95% CI, 14.8%-29.4%) from 2000 to 2019, with increases observed for favorable (32.8%-57.8%) unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (46.1%-65.2%). Among men with an LE of less than 10 years who were receiving definitive therapy, the predominant treatment was radiotherapy (78%). Among men with an LE of less than 10 years, use of radiotherapy increased from 31.3% to 44.9% (13.6%; 95% CI, 8.5%-18.7%) for intermediate-risk disease from 2000 to 2019, with increases observed for favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Among men with an LE of less than 5 years, the proportion of men treated with definitive treatment for high-risk disease increased from 17.3% to 46.5% (29.3%; 95% CI, 21.9%-36.6%) from 2000 to 2019. Among men with an LE of less than 5 years who were receiving definitive therapy, the predominant treatment was radiotherapy (85%). Among men with an LE of less than 5 years, use of radiotherapy increased from 16.3% to 39.0% (22.6%; 95% CI, 16.5%-28.8%) from 2000 to 2019. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this cohort study suggest that, in the active surveillance era, overtreatment of men with limited LE and intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer has increased in the VA, mainly with radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term Outcomes Among Men Undergoing Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Sweden
    Ventimiglia, Eugenio
    Bill-Axelson, Anna
    Bratt, Ola
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Stattin, Par
    Garmo, Hans
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (09) : E2231015
  • [42] The role of MRI in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer
    Recabal, Pedro
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2015, 25 (06) : 504 - 509
  • [43] Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance
    Yamamoto, Toshihiro
    Musunuru, Bindu
    Vesprini, Danny
    Zhang, Liying
    Ghanem, Gabriella
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Klotz, Laurence
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (05): : 1409 - 1414
  • [44] Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Velasquez, Maria C.
    Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
    Venkatramani, Vivek
    Nahar, Bruno
    Punnen, Sanoj
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (02) : 228 - 235
  • [45] Active Surveillance for Men with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer COMMENT
    Chu, Carissa
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (01): : 121 - 121
  • [46] ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER AMONG MEN WITH HIGH RISK GENETIC PREDISPOSITION
    Halstuch, Daniel
    Shenar, Chen
    Sela, Sivan
    Ber, Yaara
    Kedar, Daniel
    Baniel, Jack
    Margel, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E1010 - E1011
  • [47] Active surveillance for men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Sturch, Paul
    Kirby, Roger
    Challacombe, Ben
    TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2014, 5 (02) : 14 - 16
  • [48] Rethinking active surveillance for prostate cancer in African American men
    Leinwand, Gabriel Z.
    Gabrielson, Andrew T.
    Krane, Louis S.
    Silberstein, Jonathan L.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 : S397 - S410
  • [49] Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer in African American Men COMMENT
    Sundi, Debasish
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (06) : 1261 - 1262
  • [50] Age is Associated with Upgrading at Confirmatory Biopsy among Men with Prostate Cancer Treated with Active Surveillance
    Anderson, Christopher B.
    Sternberg, Itay A.
    Karen-Paz, Gal
    Kim, Philip H.
    Sjoberg, Daniel
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Touijer, Karim
    Eastham, James A.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (06): : 1607 - 1611