Age is Associated with Upgrading at Confirmatory Biopsy among Men with Prostate Cancer Treated with Active Surveillance

被引:20
|
作者
Anderson, Christopher B. [1 ]
Sternberg, Itay A. [1 ]
Karen-Paz, Gal [1 ]
Kim, Philip H. [1 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel [3 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [2 ]
Touijer, Karim [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Ehdaie, Behfar [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2015年 / 194卷 / 06期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; watchful waiting; magnetic resonance imaging; age factors; LOW-RISK; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.084
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Active surveillance is increasingly recommended for older men with low risk prostate cancer. Although older men have higher all cause mortality, they also have higher prostate cancer specific mortality. We hypothesized that older age is associated with an increased risk of Gleason score upgrading at confirmatory biopsy when controlling for prostate volume. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 1,130 patients with prostate cancer who were treated with active surveillance from 1991 through 2011. We included 646 patients with clinical Gleason 6 or less, stage T2a or less prostate cancer, a confirmatory biopsy within 2 years of diagnostic biopsy and prostate magnetic resonance imaging before confirmatory biopsy. The primary outcome was Gleason score upgrading to 7 or greater on confirmatory biopsy. We used logistic regression to estimate the effect of age on upgrading, adjusting for magnetic resonance imaging prostate volume and other potential confounders. Results: Median age was 66 years (IQR 61-72) and median magnetic resonance imaging prostate volume was 41 ml (IQR 29-55). At confirmatory biopsy disease was upgraded in 55 of 646 patients (9%) and unchanged in 290 (45%) and biopsy was negative in 297 (46%). Older age was associated with higher odds of upgrading (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.009). Larger prostate volume was associated with lower odds of upgrading (adjusted OR 0.80/10 ml increase, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = 0.012). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that older age is associated with an increased risk of misclassification on diagnostic biopsy. Older men who are interested in active surveillance should be counseled about the risks and benefits of confirmatory biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1611
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pathologic upgrading on confirmatory biopsy in a racially diverse group of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
    Feibus, Allison H.
    Haney, Nora M.
    Boxberger, John
    Levy, Justin
    Libby, Robert Scott
    Kramer, Jordan J.
    Ledet, Elisa M.
    Moparty, Krishnarao
    Thomas, Raju
    Lewis, Brian E.
    Silberstein, Jonathan L.
    Sartor, A. Oliver
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02)
  • [2] THE PROGNOSTIC IMPACT OF A NEGATIVE CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Salari, Keyan
    Zlatev, Dimitar
    Kuppermann, David
    Preston, Mark
    Dahl, Douglas
    Efstathiou, Jason
    Blute, Michael
    Zietman, Anthony
    Feldman, Adam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E210 - E210
  • [3] Impact of a negative confirmatory biopsy on risk of disease progression among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Salari, Keyan
    Kowitz, Jason
    Twum-Ampofo, Jeffrey
    Gusev, Andrew
    O'Shea, Aileen
    Anderson, Mark A.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Kuppermann, David
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Lee, Richard J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (09) : 387.e9 - 387.e16
  • [4] Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Luiting, Henk B.
    Van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Krestin, Gabriel P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) : 124 - 132
  • [5] MODELS INTEGRATING MRI PREDICT PROSTATE CANCER UPGRADING ON CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE PATIENTS
    Barashi, Nimrod S.
    Golan, Shay
    Wang, Chi
    Hirschhorn, Kimberly
    Petkewicz, Jacqueline
    Silvers, Robert
    Thakrar, Kiran
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Helfand, Brian T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E141 - E141
  • [6] The prognostic impact of a negative confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
    Salari, Keyan
    Zlatev, Dimitar V.
    Kuppermann, David
    Preston, Mark A.
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [7] OLDER AGE AT DIAGNOSIS AND DISEASE VOLUME PREDICT UPGRADING ON CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS BEING CONSIDERED FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Dai, Charles
    Ganesan, Vishnu
    Almassi, Nima
    Nyame, Yaw
    Greene, Daniel
    Hettel, Daniel
    Crane, Alice
    Zabell, Joseph
    Zampini, Anna
    Haywood, Samuel
    Arora, Hans
    Reichard, Chad
    El-Shafei, Ahmed
    Stein, Robert
    Fareed, Khaled
    Gong, Michael
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Klein, Eric
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1055 - E1056
  • [8] ASSOCIATION OF DIET AND NUTRIENT INTAKE WITH BIOPSY UPGRADING IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Su, Zhuo T.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal K.
    Landis, Patricia K.
    Kuczler, Morgan
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1287 - E1287
  • [9] Confirmatory biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer in men considering active surveillance: reference centre experience
    Bosco, Cecilia
    Cozzi, Gabriele
    Kinsella, Janette
    Bianchi, Roberto
    Acher, Peter
    Challacombe, Benjamin
    Popert, Rick
    Brown, Christian
    George, Gincy
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Cahill, Declan
    [J]. ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [10] TIMING OF THE CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN PROSTATE CANCER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: ANALYSIS OF THE CANARY PROSTATE CANCER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE STUDY (PASS)
    Macleod, Liam C.
    Ellis, William J.
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Zheng, Yingye
    Brooks, James D.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Lance, Raymond S.
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Wagner, Andrew A.
    Wei, John T.
    Yang, Hui-Yu
    Lin, Daniel W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E755 - E755