Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Radial vs. Femoral Access in Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Study at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

被引:0
|
作者
Amin, Shafqat [1 ]
Saeed, Ihtisham [1 ]
Khan, Naeem [1 ]
Khan, Asad Ali [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Owais [1 ]
Din, Hafsa Nasir Ud [1 ]
机构
[1] MTI Hayatabad Med Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS, Good Hope Hosp, Birmingham, England
来源
PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL | 2025年 / 58卷 / 01期
关键词
Radial access; Femoral access; PCI; Emergency PCI; Complications; Mortality; MACE; Acute coronary syndrome;
D O I
10.47144/phj.v58i1.2859
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of radial versus femoral access in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from August 2023 to July 2024. Methodology: A prospective, observational study was conducted involving 250 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing emergency PCI. Of these, 175 patients received radial access and 75 received femoral access. Data were collected on patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes, with primary outcomes focusing on complication rates, mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Statistical analysis included Chi-square and t-tests, with multivariate regression used to identify independent predictors of complications and mortality. Results: A total of 250 patients participated in the study, with 175 (70%) receiving radial access and 75 (30%) undergoing femoral access. Radial access was associated with a significantly lower complication rate (14%) compared to femoral access (30%), with a p-value of < 0.01. Procedure durations were similar between the two groups, with an average of 45.8 +/- 9.6 minutes for radial access and 47.1 +/- 10.3 minutes for femoral access. Fluoroscopy times were also comparable. In-hospital mortality was lower in the radial group (3%) than in the femoral group (7%), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.12). MACE rates were similar between the two groups, with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.58). Conclusion: Radial access demonstrated a significantly lower complication rate compared to femoral access, making it a safer alternative for emergency PCI. These findings suggest that radial access should be considered the preferred approach for emergency PCI, especially in resource-limited settings like Pakistan, where minimizing complications and improving recovery times are crucial for enhancing healthcare outcomes and operational efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A prospective randomized comparative efficacy and safety study of zolmitriptan vs. cafergot in Japanese patients with migraine
    Nishizawa, Y
    Nishizawa, Y
    Goto, HG
    Yoshioka, F
    Fushiki, S
    CEPHALALGIA, 2005, 25 (10) : 950 - 950
  • [32] RADIAL VS FEMORAL ACCESS IN PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (CABG) WHO ARE UNDERGOING DIAGNOSTIC CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY VS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI): META-ANALYSIS
    Amro, A.
    Kanbour, M.
    Hirzallah, H.
    Aqtash, O.
    El-Hamdani, A.
    Numan, Y.
    Abdelazeez, Y.
    Mansour, K.
    El-Hamdani, M.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 140 : 331 - 331
  • [33] Trans-radial vs trans-femoral access in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome with Left Main Stem Disease undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Qureshi, S. A.
    Khoo, C.
    Khan, H. S.
    Doshi, S. N.
    Townend, J. N.
    Ludman, P. F.
    Khan, S. Q.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1270 - 1270
  • [34] A prospective randomised comparison of minor bleedings in transradial vs. transfemoral access percutaneous coronary interventions for STEMI: a new FEMORAL bleeding classification
    Koltowski, Lukasz
    Filipiak, Krzysztof J.
    Tomaniak, Mariusz
    Kochman, Janusz
    Pietrasik, Arkadiusz
    Rdzanek, Adam
    Huczek, Zenon
    Scibisz, Anna
    Mazurek, Tomasz
    Opolski, Grzegorz
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2014, 72 (09) : 790 - 797
  • [35] Safety, Feasibility And Success of Radial-Versus Femoral-Access Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the Multicenter PRECISION Registry
    Pourdjabbar, Ali
    Ang, Lawrence
    Campbell, Paul T.
    Madder, Ryan D.
    Wohns, David H.
    Stys, Tomasz P.
    Caputo, Ronald
    Marshall, Jeffrey
    Parikh, Manish
    Kasi, Vijaykumar
    Weisz, Giora
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (03) : S58 - S59
  • [36] Safety and Efficacy of Three Strategies of Multi-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Same Session vs. Multi-Session vs. Multi-Hospitalization
    Blankenship, James C.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Babb, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A29 - A29
  • [37] A comparative study on transradial vs transfemoral artery access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    傅向华
    介入放射学杂志, 2003, (S1) : 152 - 152
  • [38] Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK)
    Jörg Reifart
    Stefan Göhring
    Alexander Albrecht
    Winfried Haerer
    Benny Levenson
    Gerd Ringwald
    Patrick Gärtner
    Nicolaus Reifart
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 22
  • [39] Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK)
    Reifart, Joerg
    Goehring, Stefan
    Albrecht, Alexander
    Haerer, Winfried
    Levenson, Benny
    Ringwald, Gerd
    Gaertner, Patrick
    Reifart, Nicolaus
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [40] Comparative efficacy of coronary artery bypass surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease with or without chronic kidney disease
    Baber, Usman
    Farkouh, Michael E.
    Arbel, Yaron
    Muntner, Paul
    Dangas, George
    Mack, Michael J.
    Hamza, Taye H.
    Mehran, Roxana
    Fuster, Valentin
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (46) : 3440 - 3447