Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Radial vs. Femoral Access in Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Study at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

被引:0
|
作者
Amin, Shafqat [1 ]
Saeed, Ihtisham [1 ]
Khan, Naeem [1 ]
Khan, Asad Ali [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Owais [1 ]
Din, Hafsa Nasir Ud [1 ]
机构
[1] MTI Hayatabad Med Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS, Good Hope Hosp, Birmingham, England
来源
PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL | 2025年 / 58卷 / 01期
关键词
Radial access; Femoral access; PCI; Emergency PCI; Complications; Mortality; MACE; Acute coronary syndrome;
D O I
10.47144/phj.v58i1.2859
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of radial versus femoral access in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from August 2023 to July 2024. Methodology: A prospective, observational study was conducted involving 250 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing emergency PCI. Of these, 175 patients received radial access and 75 received femoral access. Data were collected on patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes, with primary outcomes focusing on complication rates, mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Statistical analysis included Chi-square and t-tests, with multivariate regression used to identify independent predictors of complications and mortality. Results: A total of 250 patients participated in the study, with 175 (70%) receiving radial access and 75 (30%) undergoing femoral access. Radial access was associated with a significantly lower complication rate (14%) compared to femoral access (30%), with a p-value of < 0.01. Procedure durations were similar between the two groups, with an average of 45.8 +/- 9.6 minutes for radial access and 47.1 +/- 10.3 minutes for femoral access. Fluoroscopy times were also comparable. In-hospital mortality was lower in the radial group (3%) than in the femoral group (7%), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.12). MACE rates were similar between the two groups, with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.58). Conclusion: Radial access demonstrated a significantly lower complication rate compared to femoral access, making it a safer alternative for emergency PCI. These findings suggest that radial access should be considered the preferred approach for emergency PCI, especially in resource-limited settings like Pakistan, where minimizing complications and improving recovery times are crucial for enhancing healthcare outcomes and operational efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radial vs Femoral Access for Continuous Mechanical Aspiration Thrombectomy Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CHEETAH Study
    Metzger, D. Christopher
    Kolski, Brian
    Chambers, Jeff
    Dohad, Suhail
    Wu, Willis
    Parikh, Sahil
    Mathews, Jay
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 80 (12) : B241 - B242
  • [22] Comparison of Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Access for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Saleem, Muhammad Sabih
    Saqib, Najam
    Memon, Sana Shahzad
    Khan, Ayesha
    Minhas, Abdul Mannan Khan
    Hanif, Hamza
    Affan, Muhammad
    Sothwal, Arpit
    Pir, Muhammad Siddique
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (19) : B149 - B149
  • [23] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Single Center Study of 928 Consecutive Patients
    Showkathali, Refai
    Harding, Pille
    Davies, John
    Tang, Kare
    Jagathesan, Rohan
    Sayer, Jeremy
    Clesham, Gerald
    Kelly, Paul
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (21)
  • [25] A COMPARATIVE META-ANALYSIS OF DISTAL RADIAL VS. TRADITIONAL RADIAL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION OR ANGIOGRAPHY: A REGRESSION-BASED ANALYSIS
    Sattar, Yasar
    Talib, Usama
    Faisaluddin, Mohammed
    Song, David
    Lak, Hassan Mehmood
    Laghari, Aamir
    Khan, Muhammad Z.
    Ullah, Waqas
    Zghouzi, Mohamed
    Elgendy, Islam
    Balla, Sudarshan
    Daggubati, Ramesh Babu
    Kawsara, Akram
    Jneid, Hani
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Alam, Mahboob
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 924 - 924
  • [26] Safety and efficacy of the radial approach for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
    Diaz-Cortegana, F.
    Yuste-Dominguez, M.
    Nogales, J. M.
    Lopez-Minguez, J. R.
    Gonzalez-Fernandez, R.
    Merchan-Herrera, A.
    Martinez-Caceres, G.
    Martinez-Naharro, A.
    Sanchez-Giralt, S.
    Doncel-Vecino, L. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 475 - 475
  • [27] Comparison between radial versus femoral percutaneous coronary intervention access in Indonesian hospitals, 2017-2018: A prospective observational study of a national registry
    Alkatiri, Amir Aziz
    Firman, Doni
    Haryono, Nur
    Yonas, Emir
    Pranata, Raymond
    Fahri, Ismir
    Artha, I. Made Junior Rina
    Pratama, Vireza
    Widodo, Wishnu Aditya
    Taufiq, Nahar
    Alkatiri, Abdul Hakim
    Ng, Sunanto
    Sulastomo, Heru
    Soerianata, Sunarya
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2020, 27
  • [28] Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarctionA randomized prospective multicenter trial
    Christiana Schernthaner
    Matthias Hammerer
    Stefan Harb
    Matthias Heigert
    Kurt Hoellinger
    Elisabeth Lassnig
    Edwin Maurer
    Jochen Schuler
    Peter Siostrzonek
    Hanno Ulmer
    Andreas Winter
    Johann Altenberger
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2018, 130 : 182 - 189
  • [29] Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction A randomized prospective multicenter trial
    Schernthaner, Christiana
    Hammerer, Matthias
    Harb, Stefan
    Heigert, Matthias
    Hoellinger, Kurt
    Lassnig, Elisabeth
    Maurer, Edwin
    Schuler, Jochen
    Siostrzonek, Peter
    Ulmer, Hanno
    Winter, Andreas
    Altenberger, Johann
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 130 (5-6) : 182 - 189
  • [30] Radial versus femoral access for acute percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction a randomized prospective multicenter trial
    Altenberger, J.
    Heigert, M.
    Hammerer, M.
    Kraus, J.
    Winter, A.
    Siostrzonek, P.
    Maurer, E.
    Lassnig, E.
    Harb, S.
    Schuler, J.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 125 : S38 - S38