Managing Late-Onset ERF-Related Craniosynostosis With Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:0
|
作者
Ferry, Andrew M. [1 ]
Marx-Albuquerque, Leandro [1 ]
Burch, Samantha J. [1 ]
Meza-Rochin, Ana [1 ]
Balumuka, Darius [1 ]
Howell, Lori K. [1 ]
Selden, Nathan R. [1 ]
Wolfswinkel, Erik M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
来源
FACE | 2025年
关键词
craniosynostosis; distraction osteogenesis; neuroplastic; neurosurgery; plastic surgery; OSSEOUS DEFECTS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1177/27325016241313390
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: ETS2 Repressor Factor (ERF) gene-related craniosynostosis is a rare condition characterized by pre- and/or post-natal fusion of 1 or more cranial sutures. In this report, we present our center's experience managing ERF-related craniosynostosis in 2 patients with intracranial hypertension using cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (CVDO). Methods: Both patients underwent genetic testing and 24 hour intracranial pressure monitoring prior to surgery. Additionally, they were followed with regular clinical and dilated eye exams for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Morphological and volumetric analysis were performed using pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans. Results: Both patients presented with late-onset, multisuture craniosynostosis. Patient 1 underwent lateral expansion of 2 frontoparieto-occipital bone segments at 5 years of age. A total expansion of 28 mm was performed (14 mm on each side) over a period of 12 days. Pre- and post-operative CIs were 69.3 and 81.3, respectively, and volumetric analysis revealed a 24.4% increase in his intracranial volume. Patient 2 underwent posterior expansion of a single parieto-occipital bone segment at 4 years and 10 months of age. A total expansion of 25.2 mm was performed over a period of 21 days. Pre- and post-operative CIs were 72.8 and 69.9, respectively. Volumetric analysis could not be performed owing to the poor resolution of the patient's post-operative CT scan that was obtained from an outside institution. Both patients had their distractors removed following a 2 month consolidation period. No complications, signs of intracranial hypertension, or bony defects were noted for both patients at 2 years post-operatively. Conclusions: CVDO provides a tested option with excellent outcomes for treating patients with ERF-related craniosynostosis. Continued education of clinicians and families regarding ERF-related craniosynostosis is key to ensuring that patients with this genetic mutation promptly establish care for close surveillance and, in turn, prompt treatment if necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Utilization of a Simple Surgical Guide for Multidirectional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis in Craniosynostosis
    Matsui, Chihiro
    Tokuyama, Eijiro
    Senoo, Takaya
    Yamada, Kiyoshi
    Kameda, Masahiro
    Takeuchi, Tetsuo
    Kimata, Yoshihiro
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (04)
  • [42] Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery: Technical note
    de Kerangal, Q.
    Pare, A.
    Joly, A.
    Travers, N.
    Goga, D.
    Laure, B.
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 119 (01): : 71 - 74
  • [43] Volumetric Changes in Cranial Vault Expansion: Comparison of Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Posterior Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis
    Derderian, Christopher A.
    Wink, Jason D.
    McGrath, Jennifer L.
    Collinsworth, Amy
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (06) : 1665 - 1672
  • [44] Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis for Craniosynostosis-Surgical Outcomes Over 12 Years
    El-Nemr, Mohamed
    Richardson, David
    Duncan, Christian
    England, Jane
    Russell, Luci
    Parks, Christopher
    Sinha, Ajay
    Ellenbogen, Jonathan
    Vakharia, Vejay
    Hennedige, Anusha Adeline
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2025, 36 (02) : 491 - 496
  • [45] Early cranial vault distraction for a more balanced and enhanced expansion: a 3D craniometric analysis of anterior versus posterior distraction osteogenesis in patients with craniosynostosis
    Jeon, Sungmi
    Chung, Jee Hyeok
    Kim, Sukwha
    Kim, Seung-Ki
    Phi, Ji Hoon
    Lee, Ji Yeoun
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Wang, Kyu-Chang
    Kim, Byung Jun
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2021, 30 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [46] A progressive and complex clinical course in two family members with ERF-related craniosynostosis: a case report
    Korberg, Izabella
    Nowinski, Daniel
    Bondeson, Marie-Louise
    Melin, Malin
    Kolby, Lars
    Stattin, Eva-Lena
    BMC MEDICAL GENETICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [47] Evidence for long-term effectiveness of cranial distraction osteogenesis for syndromic craniosynostosis
    Rieger, Ulrich M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (02): : 166 - 166
  • [48] Complications associated with gradual cranial vault distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis
    Yonehara, Y
    Hirabayashi, S
    Sugawara, Y
    Sakurai, A
    Harii, K
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 14 (04) : 526 - 528
  • [49] Morphometric analysis and outcomes following posterior cranial vault distraction in syndromic and multisuture craniosynostosis
    Al -Shaqsi, Sultan
    Ching, Jessica A.
    Novak, Christine B.
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 87 : 379 - 386
  • [50] Changes in Ventricular Volume After Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Syndromic and Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis
    Pontell, Matthew E.
    Barrero, Carlos E.
    Naidu, Kirin
    Hitchner, Michaela
    Wagner, Connor S.
    Salinero, Lauren K.
    Swanson, Jordan W.
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 35 (07) : 1967 - 1971