Managing Late-Onset ERF-Related Craniosynostosis With Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:0
|
作者
Ferry, Andrew M. [1 ]
Marx-Albuquerque, Leandro [1 ]
Burch, Samantha J. [1 ]
Meza-Rochin, Ana [1 ]
Balumuka, Darius [1 ]
Howell, Lori K. [1 ]
Selden, Nathan R. [1 ]
Wolfswinkel, Erik M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
来源
FACE | 2025年
关键词
craniosynostosis; distraction osteogenesis; neuroplastic; neurosurgery; plastic surgery; OSSEOUS DEFECTS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1177/27325016241313390
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: ETS2 Repressor Factor (ERF) gene-related craniosynostosis is a rare condition characterized by pre- and/or post-natal fusion of 1 or more cranial sutures. In this report, we present our center's experience managing ERF-related craniosynostosis in 2 patients with intracranial hypertension using cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (CVDO). Methods: Both patients underwent genetic testing and 24 hour intracranial pressure monitoring prior to surgery. Additionally, they were followed with regular clinical and dilated eye exams for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Morphological and volumetric analysis were performed using pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans. Results: Both patients presented with late-onset, multisuture craniosynostosis. Patient 1 underwent lateral expansion of 2 frontoparieto-occipital bone segments at 5 years of age. A total expansion of 28 mm was performed (14 mm on each side) over a period of 12 days. Pre- and post-operative CIs were 69.3 and 81.3, respectively, and volumetric analysis revealed a 24.4% increase in his intracranial volume. Patient 2 underwent posterior expansion of a single parieto-occipital bone segment at 4 years and 10 months of age. A total expansion of 25.2 mm was performed over a period of 21 days. Pre- and post-operative CIs were 72.8 and 69.9, respectively. Volumetric analysis could not be performed owing to the poor resolution of the patient's post-operative CT scan that was obtained from an outside institution. Both patients had their distractors removed following a 2 month consolidation period. No complications, signs of intracranial hypertension, or bony defects were noted for both patients at 2 years post-operatively. Conclusions: CVDO provides a tested option with excellent outcomes for treating patients with ERF-related craniosynostosis. Continued education of clinicians and families regarding ERF-related craniosynostosis is key to ensuring that patients with this genetic mutation promptly establish care for close surveillance and, in turn, prompt treatment if necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Craniometric Analysis of Posterior Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis
    Goldstein, Jesse A.
    Paliga, J. Thomas
    Wink, Jason D.
    Low, David W.
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (06) : 1367 - 1375
  • [22] Transverse Distraction Osteogenesis for Posterior Narrowing of the Cranial Vault
    Kalmar, Christopher L.
    Zapatero, Zachary D.
    Kosyk, Mychajlo S.
    Carlson, Anna R.
    Swanson, Jordan W.
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 149 (04) : 749E - 752E
  • [23] Cranial vault expansion by distraction osteogenesis Clinical article
    Winston, Ken R.
    Ketch, Lawrence L.
    Dowlati, Dylaan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2011, 7 (04) : 351 - 361
  • [24] Distraction osteogenesis of the cranial vault for the treatment of craniofacial synostosis
    Cho, BC
    Hwang, SK
    Uhm, KI
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 15 (01) : 135 - 144
  • [25] Posterior cranial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis
    Derderian, Christopher A.
    Bastidas, Nicholas
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2012, 28 (09) : 1551 - 1556
  • [26] Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in the immunocompromised patient
    John S. Sullivan
    Alicia E. Snider
    Jeffrey Farrington
    J. Mason Shiflett
    Kristin J. Weaver
    Laura S. Humphries
    Ian C. Hoppe
    Child's Nervous System, 2021, 37 : 2313 - 2318
  • [27] Expansion of the Posterior Cranial Vault Using Distraction Osteogenesis
    Steinbacher, Derek M.
    Skirpan, Jan
    Puchala, Jacek
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (02) : 792 - 801
  • [28] Posterior Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis: Evolution of Technique
    Ong, Juling
    Harshbarger, Raymond J., III
    Kelley, Patrick
    George, Timothy
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 28 (04) : 163 - 178
  • [29] Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in the immunocompromised patient
    Sullivan, John S.
    Snider, Alicia E.
    Farrington, Jeffrey
    Shiflett, J. Mason
    Weaver, Kristin J.
    Humphries, Laura S.
    Hoppe, Ian C.
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2021, 37 (07) : 2313 - 2318
  • [30] Posterior Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis Utilizing a Posterior-Superior Distraction Vector in the Treatment of Mercedes Benz Pattern Craniosynostosis
    Marji, Fady P.
    Block, Lisa M.
    Anstadt, Erin E.
    Dvoracek, Lucas A.
    Bruce, Madeleine K.
    Williams, Abraham A.
    Hall, Jennifer A.
    Losee, Joseph E.
    Goldstein, Jesse A.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (06) : 2059 - 2063