Omental preservation versus omentectomy in curative-intent gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Swedish population-based cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Biying [1 ,2 ]
Kung, Chih-Han [3 ]
Tsekrekos, Andrianos [1 ,2 ]
Klevebro, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
Mayerhofer, Raphaela [1 ,2 ]
Engblom, Laura Vossen [1 ,2 ]
Lindblad, Mats [1 ,2 ]
Hedberg, Jakob [4 ]
Szabo, Eva [5 ]
Edholm, David [6 ]
Smedh, Ulrika [7 ]
Johansson, Jan [8 ,9 ]
Rouvelas, Ioannis [1 ,2 ]
Nilsson, Magnus [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Div Surg & Oncol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Upper Abdominal Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Surg, Umea, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Surg, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Linkoping Univ, Dept Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[7] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Surg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Lund, Sweden
[9] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden
来源
BJS OPEN | 2025年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
MILKY SPOTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zraf012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Omentectomy has traditionally been performed in gastric cancer surgery, but omental preservation has become increasingly common. It is unclear whether omentectomy leads to additional survival benefit compared with omental preservation. This nationwide population-based cohort study aimed to assess survival and surgical outcomes comparing omental preservation to omentectomy in curative-intent gastrectomy.Methods Patients were identified from the Swedish National Registry for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer with inclusion between 2006 and 2022. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed by a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, clinical T and N stage, type of gastrectomy, surgical approach, extent of lymphadenectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery year and regional cancer centre. Secondary endpoints were surgical outcomes including tumour-free resection margins, lymph node yield and postoperative complications.Results A total of 1615 patients were included, 517 (32.0%) underwent gastrectomy with omental preservation, and 1098 (68.0%) underwent gastrectomy with omentectomy. Overall survival after omental preservation was similar compared with omentectomy in the multivariable Cox model (HR 1.00, 95% c.i. 0.83 to 1.20; P = 0.967). Omental preservation also had similar surgical outcomes including lymph node yield and postoperative morbidity rate, compared with omentectomy.Conclusions Omental preservation was similar to omentectomy in terms of overall survival and surgical outcomes. The results suggest that omentectomy can safely be omitted in curative-intent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. This Swedish population-based cohort study showed similar survival and surgical outcomes after gastrectomy with omental preservation compared with gastrectomy with omentectomy. These results suggest that omentectomy can be omitted for patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative-intent gastrectomy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Proton pump inhibitors and gastric cancer: a population-based cohort study
    Patel, Jigar
    Berezowski, Ivan
    Janapala, Rajesh Naidu
    Pourmand, Ali
    GUT, 2022, 71 (05) : 1039 - 1041
  • [42] Surgical Compliance and Outcomes in Gastric Cancer: a population-based cohort study
    Liu, Guihua
    Xu, Ming
    Gao, Tingting
    Xu, Lingying
    Zeng, Peijun
    Bo, Haiying
    Li, Fang
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Zhengting
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (04): : 779 - 788
  • [43] Annual surgeon and hospital volume of gastrectomy and gastric adenocarcinoma survival in a population-based cohort study
    Asplund, Johannes
    Mattsson, Fredrik
    Plecka-Ostlund, Magdalena
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Lagergren, Jesper
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2022, 61 (04) : 425 - 432
  • [44] Cardiovascular outcomes after curative prostate cancer treatment: A population-based cohort study
    Kjellstadli, Camilla
    Forster, Rachel B.
    Myklebust, Tor A.
    Bjorge, Tone
    Bonaa, Kaare H.
    Helle, Svein I.
    Kvale, Rune
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [45] The safety and efficacy of gastrectomy for gastric cancer among octogenarians: a western population-based study
    Pak, Linda M.
    Yang, Tingsong
    Wang, Jiping
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 10 (04) : 598 - 603
  • [46] Survival benefits of gastrectomy in patients with stage IV gastric cancer: A population-based study
    He, Xingkang
    Wu, Wenrui
    Ding, Yue
    Lin, Zhenghua
    Sun, Lei-Min
    Si, Jianmin
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 : 40 - 40
  • [47] Survival benefits of gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with stage IV: a population-based study
    He, Xingkang
    Lai, Sanchuan
    Su, Tingting
    Liu, Yangyang
    Ding, Yue
    Quan, Sheng
    Si, Jianmin
    Sun, Leimin
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (63) : 106577 - 106586
  • [48] Gastric cancer molecular classification based on immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization: Analysis in western patients after curative-intent surgery
    Kodama Pertille Ramos, Marcus Fernando
    Pereira, Marina Alessandra
    de Mello, Evandro Sobroza
    Cirqueira, Cinthya dos Santos
    Zilberstein, Bruno
    Ferreira Alves, Venancio Avancini
    Ribeiro-Junior, Ulysses
    Cecconello, Ivan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (08): : 688 - 701
  • [49] Comment on: Esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy: a population-based comparative cohort study
    Nickel, Felix
    Felinska, Eleni Amelia
    Billeter, Adrian Theophil
    Mueller-Stich, Beat Peter
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2021, 17 (05) : 887 - 888
  • [50] Trends and Disparities in Curative-Intent Treatment for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis of Surgery and SBRT
    Liu, Q.
    Medina, H. N.
    Jacobs, K. T.
    Brown, C. P.
    Koru-Sengul, T.
    Lopes, G. De Lima
    Rodriguez, E.
    Pinheiro, P.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (11) : S275 - S275