Omental preservation versus omentectomy in curative-intent gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Swedish population-based cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Biying [1 ,2 ]
Kung, Chih-Han [3 ]
Tsekrekos, Andrianos [1 ,2 ]
Klevebro, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
Mayerhofer, Raphaela [1 ,2 ]
Engblom, Laura Vossen [1 ,2 ]
Lindblad, Mats [1 ,2 ]
Hedberg, Jakob [4 ]
Szabo, Eva [5 ]
Edholm, David [6 ]
Smedh, Ulrika [7 ]
Johansson, Jan [8 ,9 ]
Rouvelas, Ioannis [1 ,2 ]
Nilsson, Magnus [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Div Surg & Oncol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Upper Abdominal Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Surg, Umea, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Surg, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Linkoping Univ, Dept Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[7] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Surg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Lund, Sweden
[9] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden
来源
BJS OPEN | 2025年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
MILKY SPOTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zraf012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Omentectomy has traditionally been performed in gastric cancer surgery, but omental preservation has become increasingly common. It is unclear whether omentectomy leads to additional survival benefit compared with omental preservation. This nationwide population-based cohort study aimed to assess survival and surgical outcomes comparing omental preservation to omentectomy in curative-intent gastrectomy.Methods Patients were identified from the Swedish National Registry for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer with inclusion between 2006 and 2022. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed by a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, clinical T and N stage, type of gastrectomy, surgical approach, extent of lymphadenectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery year and regional cancer centre. Secondary endpoints were surgical outcomes including tumour-free resection margins, lymph node yield and postoperative complications.Results A total of 1615 patients were included, 517 (32.0%) underwent gastrectomy with omental preservation, and 1098 (68.0%) underwent gastrectomy with omentectomy. Overall survival after omental preservation was similar compared with omentectomy in the multivariable Cox model (HR 1.00, 95% c.i. 0.83 to 1.20; P = 0.967). Omental preservation also had similar surgical outcomes including lymph node yield and postoperative morbidity rate, compared with omentectomy.Conclusions Omental preservation was similar to omentectomy in terms of overall survival and surgical outcomes. The results suggest that omentectomy can safely be omitted in curative-intent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. This Swedish population-based cohort study showed similar survival and surgical outcomes after gastrectomy with omental preservation compared with gastrectomy with omentectomy. These results suggest that omentectomy can be omitted for patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative-intent gastrectomy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety of curative-intent lung cancer surgery in older patients (octogenarians): A contemporary multicentre cohort study
    King, Jenny
    Taylor, Marcus
    Booton, Richard
    Crosbie, Phil
    Shah, Dinakshi
    Evison, Matthew
    Ng, Cassandra
    Rammohan, Kandadai
    Shah, Rajesh
    Shackcloth, Michael
    Grant, Stuart W.
    Sinnott, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [22] Statin use in relation to long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: a Swedish population-based cohort study
    Dag Holmberg
    Joonas H. Kauppila
    Johannes Asplund
    Wilhelm Leijonmarck
    Fredrik Mattsson
    Jesper Lagergren
    Gastric Cancer, 2024, 27 : 590 - 597
  • [23] Cancer risk in individuals with polydactyly: a Swedish population-based cohort study
    Wachtmeister, Alexandra
    Tettamanti, Giorgio
    Nordgren, Ida
    Norrby, Christina
    Laurell, Tobias
    Lu, Yunxia
    Nordenvall, Anna Skarin
    Nordgren, Ann
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 131 (04) : 755 - 762
  • [24] The impact of curative intent surgery on the survival of pancreatic cancer patients: A US Population-based study
    Shaib, Yasser
    Davila, Jessica
    Naumann, Chris
    El-Serag, Hashem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (07): : 1377 - 1382
  • [25] FAMILIAL AGGREGATION OF GASTRIC CANCER: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY
    Leung, Wai Keung
    Ho, Hsiu J.
    Lin, Jaw-Town
    Wu, Chun-Ying
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S510 - S510
  • [26] Prognosis of gastric cancer after curative surgery:: A population-based study.
    Sánchez-Cantalejo, E
    Caballero, AM
    Martínez, C
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A671 - A671
  • [27] Risk of tuberculosis after endoscopic resection and gastrectomy in gastric cancer: nationwide population-based matched cohort study
    Hye Sung Khil
    Sue In Choi
    Byung-Keun Kim
    Eun Joo Lee
    Sang Yeub Lee
    Ji Hyun Kim
    Won Jai Jung
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 1358 - 1366
  • [28] Predictors of Remission and Relapse of Diabetes after Conventional Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
    Kwon, Yeongkeun
    Kwon, Jin-Won
    Kim, Dohyang
    Ha, Jane
    Park, Shin-Hoo
    Hwang, Jinseub
    Heo, Yoonseok
    Park, Sungsoo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 232 (06) : 973 - +
  • [29] Risk of tuberculosis after endoscopic resection and gastrectomy in gastric cancer: nationwide population-based matched cohort study
    Khil, Hye Sung
    Choi, Sue In
    Kim, Byung-Keun
    Lee, Eun Joo
    Lee, Sang Yeub
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Jung, Won Jai
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (03): : 1358 - 1366
  • [30] Comparison of Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Antecolic Versus Retrocolic Reconstruction: A Population-Based Study
    Junttila, Anna
    Helminen, Olli
    Helmio, Mika
    Huhta, Heikki
    Jalkanen, Aapo
    Kallio, Raija
    Koivukangas, Vesa
    Kokkola, Arto
    Laine, Simo
    Lietzen, Elina
    Louhimo, Johanna
    Merilainen, Sanna
    Pohjanen, Vesa-Matti
    Rantanen, Tuomo
    Ristimaki, Ari
    Rasanen, Jari V.
    Saarnio, Juha
    Sihvo, Eero
    Toikkanen, Vesa
    Tyrvainen, Tuula
    Valtola, Antti
    Kauppila, Joonas H.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, : 5263 - 5272