Assessment of Holmium:YAG, Pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. In Vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sierra, Alba [1 ]
Panthier, Frederic [2 ]
Castillo, Esther [3 ]
Mercade, Asier [1 ]
Peri, Lluis [1 ]
Alcaraz, Antonio [1 ]
Traxer, Olivier [2 ]
Lopez, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Luque, Maria Pilar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Sorbonne Univ, Tenon Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[3] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Holmium YAG; pulsed-thulium YAG; thulium fiber laser; laser efficiency; thermal damage; urinary stones; laser setting; laser parameters; LITHOTRIPSY; POWER; YAG;
D O I
10.1089/end.2024.0349
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the ablation speed (AS), laser efficiency and direct thermal lesions during urinary stone lithotripsy with the current available laser technologies: Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG), pulsed-Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL) in vitro using different laser settings. Materials and Methods: Ho:YAG, p-Tm:YAG, and TFL laser system were used in an in vitro ureteral model with a volume of 125 mm(3) Begostone. The following parameters were tested across all laser devices: 0.6J/10 Hz (6 W), 0.6 J/20 Hz (12 W), 1.5 J/10 Hz (15 W), and 1.5 J/20 Hz (30 W), employing short pulse width for all lasers and long pulse width for Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG. Ten participants conducted the experimental setup during 3-minutes laser on time, combining the laser technology, settings, and pulse widths, with a total of 20 different combinations. The efficiency, AS and ureteral damage resulting from each intervention were analyzed. Results: p-Tm:YAG and TFL demonstrated significantly higher efficiency compared with Ho:YAG (0.049 +/- 0.02 Delta gr/KJ and 0.042 +/- 0.01 Delta gr/KJ vs 0.029 +/- 0.01 Delta gr/KJ; p < 0.05). In all laser sources, as the power increases, the AS also increases (p < 0.05). Furthermore, only at high-energy settings (1.5 J) higher frequency led to increase AS (p < 0.05). Both, p-Tm:YAG and TFL exhibited higher AS compared to Ho:YAG (0.64 +/- 0.33 Delta gr/s and 0.62 +/- 0.31 Delta gr/s vs 0.44 +/- 0.22 Delta gr/s; p < 0.05). Regarding ureteral injuries, as the power increases, there is a higher chance of ureteral damage (p = 0.031). No differences were observed between laser technologies (p = 0.828). Conclusions: Both, p-Tm:YAG and TFL exhibited superior performances during laser lithotripsy compared with Ho:YAG, as they demonstrated higher efficiency and ablation speed. Thermal damage did not appear to be associated with specific laser equipment, but higher grades of lesions are described by increasing power.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1216
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Holmium:YAG vs Thulium Fiber Laser Dusting of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Stones
    Hardy, Luke A.
    Vinnichenko, Viktoriya
    Fried, Nathaniel M.
    THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS IN UROLOGY 2019, 2019, 10852
  • [42] A MATCHED-PAIRED COMPARISON OF A NOVEL PULSED THULIUM:YAG LASER WITH A CONTINUOUS WAVE THULIUM FIBRE LASER AND A HOLMIUM:YAG LASER FOR ENDOSCOPIC ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE (EEP)
    Netsch, Christopher
    Becker, Benedikt
    Rosenbaum, Clemens
    Gross, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E64 - E64
  • [43] Laser absorption coefficient of thulium fiber laser and holmium Yag laser: in what scale
    Nguyen, Dong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (04) : 1207 - 1208
  • [44] Laser Efficiency and Laser Safety: Holmium YAG vs. Thulium Fiber Laser
    Sierra, Alba
    Corrales, Mariela
    Somani, Bhaskar
    Traxer, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [45] Laser absorption coefficient of thulium fiber laser and holmium Yag laser: in what scale
    Dong Nguyen
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 1207 - 1208
  • [46] Thulium fiber vs. thulium yag laser effect on upper urinary tract soft tissue: An ex vivo study
    Pavia, M. P.
    Proietti, S.
    Rico, L.
    Blas, L.
    Luciano, R.
    Tenace, N. P.
    Contreras, P.
    Galosi, A. B.
    Gaboardi, F.
    Giusti, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S450 - S451
  • [47] Comparison of the efficacy of a pulsed thulium YAG laser versus a holmium YAG laser on dusting lithotripsy: In vitro analysis using an optical motion capture system
    Nakao, Kazuyoshi
    Yoshida, Takashi
    Takayasu, Kenta
    Chuman, Keiki
    Matsunaga, Tadao
    Kinoshita, Hidefumi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (11) : 1288 - 1290
  • [48] Hybrid Thulium-YAG pulsed laser for stone lithotripsy in real clinical practice
    Rodriguez Socarras, M. E.
    Llanes Gonzalez, L.
    Ruiz Grana, S.
    Reinoso Elbers, J.
    Carrion Monsalve, D.
    Gomez Rivas, J.
    Greco, I
    Fernandez Del Alamo, J.
    Gomez Sancha, F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [49] Thulium:YAG (Yttrium Aluminium Garnet) pulsed laser vs Holmium:YAG laser in RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery): A comparative prospective study
    Carbonaro, B.
    Mondino, P.
    Filocamo, M. T.
    Rosso, D.
    Rossi, R.
    Polledro, P.
    Borsa, R.
    Cordara, G.
    Coppola, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S506 - S506
  • [50] Assessment of intrarenal temperature dynamics when using holmium and thulium: YAG lasers in an ex vivo porcine kidney model
    Emiliani, E.
    Territo, A.
    Cortez, J. F. Calderon
    Meneghetti, I.
    Subiela, J. D.
    Basile, G.
    Angerri, O.
    Palou, J.
    Breda, A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2023, 47 (03): : 159 - 164