Assessment of Holmium:YAG, Pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. In Vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sierra, Alba [1 ]
Panthier, Frederic [2 ]
Castillo, Esther [3 ]
Mercade, Asier [1 ]
Peri, Lluis [1 ]
Alcaraz, Antonio [1 ]
Traxer, Olivier [2 ]
Lopez, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Luque, Maria Pilar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Sorbonne Univ, Tenon Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[3] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Holmium YAG; pulsed-thulium YAG; thulium fiber laser; laser efficiency; thermal damage; urinary stones; laser setting; laser parameters; LITHOTRIPSY; POWER; YAG;
D O I
10.1089/end.2024.0349
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the ablation speed (AS), laser efficiency and direct thermal lesions during urinary stone lithotripsy with the current available laser technologies: Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG), pulsed-Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL) in vitro using different laser settings. Materials and Methods: Ho:YAG, p-Tm:YAG, and TFL laser system were used in an in vitro ureteral model with a volume of 125 mm(3) Begostone. The following parameters were tested across all laser devices: 0.6J/10 Hz (6 W), 0.6 J/20 Hz (12 W), 1.5 J/10 Hz (15 W), and 1.5 J/20 Hz (30 W), employing short pulse width for all lasers and long pulse width for Ho:YAG and p-Tm:YAG. Ten participants conducted the experimental setup during 3-minutes laser on time, combining the laser technology, settings, and pulse widths, with a total of 20 different combinations. The efficiency, AS and ureteral damage resulting from each intervention were analyzed. Results: p-Tm:YAG and TFL demonstrated significantly higher efficiency compared with Ho:YAG (0.049 +/- 0.02 Delta gr/KJ and 0.042 +/- 0.01 Delta gr/KJ vs 0.029 +/- 0.01 Delta gr/KJ; p < 0.05). In all laser sources, as the power increases, the AS also increases (p < 0.05). Furthermore, only at high-energy settings (1.5 J) higher frequency led to increase AS (p < 0.05). Both, p-Tm:YAG and TFL exhibited higher AS compared to Ho:YAG (0.64 +/- 0.33 Delta gr/s and 0.62 +/- 0.31 Delta gr/s vs 0.44 +/- 0.22 Delta gr/s; p < 0.05). Regarding ureteral injuries, as the power increases, there is a higher chance of ureteral damage (p = 0.031). No differences were observed between laser technologies (p = 0.828). Conclusions: Both, p-Tm:YAG and TFL exhibited superior performances during laser lithotripsy compared with Ho:YAG, as they demonstrated higher efficiency and ablation speed. Thermal damage did not appear to be associated with specific laser equipment, but higher grades of lesions are described by increasing power.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1216
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios
    Solano, Catalina
    Corrales, Mariela
    Panthier, Frederic
    Candela, Luigi
    Doizi, Steeve
    Traxer, Olivier
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (10) : 2627 - 2636
  • [32] Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios
    Catalina Solano
    Mariela Corrales
    Frederic Panthier
    Luigi Candela
    Steeve Doizi
    Olivier Traxer
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 2627 - 2636
  • [33] Pulsed thulium: YAG laser - what is the lithotripsy ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones? Results from an in-vitro PEARLS study
    Kwok, J-L.
    Ventimiglia, E.
    De Coninck, V.
    Panthier, F.
    Barghouthy, Y.
    Danilovic, A.
    Shrestha, A.
    Smyth, N.
    Schmid, F.
    Hunziker, M.
    Poyet, C.
    Daudon, M.
    Traxer, O.
    Eberli, D.
    Keller, E. X.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1313 - S1314
  • [34] Thulium fiber laser versus pulsed Thulium:YAG for laser lithotripsy during flexible ureteroscopy
    Panthier, Frederic
    Solano, Catalina
    Chicaud, Marie
    Kutchukian, Stessy
    Candela, Luigi
    Doizi, Steeve
    Corrales, Mariela
    Traxer, Olivier
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [35] Innovative use of the new pulsed-thulium: YAG laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: can the "kidney stone calculator" predict lithotripsy duration?
    Kutchukian, Stessy
    Chicaud, Marie
    Doizi, Steeve
    Solano, Catalina
    Traxer, Olivier
    Panthier, Frederic
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 53 (01)
  • [36] Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy
    Viktoria Andreeva
    Andrey Vinarov
    Ilya Yaroslavsky
    Anastasia Kovalenko
    Alexander Vybornov
    Leonid Rapoport
    Dmitry Enikeev
    Nikolay Sorokin
    Alim Dymov
    Dmitry Tsarichenko
    Petr Glybochko
    Nathaniel Fried
    Olivier Traxer
    Gregory Altshuler
    Valentin Gapontsev
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 497 - 503
  • [37] Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy
    Andreeva, Viktoria
    Vinarov, Andrey
    Yaroslavsky, Ilya
    Kovalenko, Anastasia
    Vybornov, Alexander
    Rapoport, Leonid
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    Sorokin, Nikolay
    Dymov, Alim
    Tsarichenko, Dmitry
    Glybochko, Petr
    Fried, Nathaniel
    Traxer, Olivier
    Altshuler, Gregory
    Gapontsev, Valentin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (02) : 497 - 503
  • [38] Comparison of Temperature Changes Between Holmium-YAG Laser and Thulium Fiber Laser in an In Vitro Setting
    Patel, Vaibhavkumar
    Raghuvanshi, Kshitij
    Jadeja, Krushnadevsinh
    Chaudhari, Rajeev
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 50 (04)
  • [39] Shorter operative time independent of stone density with thulium fiber laser versus Holmium:YAG-laser
    Michiels T.
    Niemeijer A.S.
    Poerink J.G.H.
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2024, 14 (1) : 2 - 7
  • [40] THULIUM FIBER VS THULIUM YAG LASER EFFECT ON UPPER URINARY TRACT SOFT TISSUE: AN EX VIVO STUDY
    Rico, Luis
    Proietti, Silvia
    Pavia, Maria Pia
    Blas, Leandro
    Luciano, Roberta
    Tenace, Nazario Pio
    Contreras, Pablo
    Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
    Gaboardi, Franco
    Giusti, Guido
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E641 - E642