Strategies for Managing Agricultural Waste and Disposal Options Available to Farmers

被引:0
|
作者
Yelboga, Makbule Nisa Mencet [1 ]
Sayin, Cengiz [1 ]
Metin, Fatma Dilek [1 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Antalya, Turkiye
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
recycling; greenhouse; tomato; plant wastes; rural area;
D O I
10.1177/21582440241290008
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Agricultural wastes are highly significant, both economically and environmentally. This study, is intended to raise awareness of economic and social issues that are concentrated upon these attitudes and inclinations of waste producers. In this case study, it was found that vegetable waste was the most common type of waste generated. It was found that producers prefer to give whatever they can sell to the scrap dealer, and they mostly incinerate empty manure packages. While vegetable waste is buried in the soil after harvest, it has been discovered that the rope used in tomato production generates the highest amount of waste. In the 250 holdings selected for research, 13.6% of the nylons to be disposed of are thrown in the trash, 33.2% are sent for recycling, 6.4% are incinerated, 0.8% are buried in the ground, 4% are taken out of the holding area, 0.4% are left inside the holding area, 2% are reused, and 39.6% are scrapped. Producers stated that they want to evaluate agricultural wastes, but this requires extra time and labor. In the field study, 78% of respondents agreed with the statement "disposal of agricultural wastes inside the holding area is a time-consuming process." Economically and environmentally, agricultural wastes are important. This study raises awareness of economic and social issues related to waste producers' attitudes and inclinations. In this case study, Vegetable waste was the most prevalent. Producers prefer to sell waste to the waste dealer and incinerate empty manure packages. Tomato production rope generates the most waste after harvest. which is buried in the soil. Tomato production rope generates the most waste after harvest, which is buried in the soil. In the 250 holdings studied, 13.6% of nylons are thrown away, 33.2% are recycled, 6.4% are incinerated, 0.8% are buried, 4% are taken out of the holding area, 0.4% are left inside, and 2% are reused, and 39.6% are scrapped. Producers want to evaluate agricultural waste, but it takes time. "Disposal of agricultural waste inside the holding area is a time-consuming process." 78% of the field study respondents agreed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MODELING STUDIES USED TO EVALUATE WASTE-DISPOSAL OPTIONS
    GRIMWOOD, P
    HILL, M
    WEBB, G
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1978, 23 (266): : 55 - 57
  • [42] A Review on Medical Waste Management: Treatment, Recycling, and Disposal Options
    Attrah, Mustafa
    Elmanadely, Amira
    Akter, Dilruba
    Rene, Eldon R.
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2022, 9 (11)
  • [43] COMPARING ASH-FGD WASTE-DISPOSAL OPTIONS
    ANSARI, A
    OVEN, J
    POLLUTION ENGINEERING, 1980, 12 (05) : 66 - 70
  • [44] Solid waste disposal options in Malaysia: A contingent valuation experience
    Chuen-Khee, Pek
    Othman, Jamal
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (12) : 2565 - 2566
  • [45] Managing the uncertainties of low-level radioactive waste disposal
    Bullard, Clark W.
    Weger, Hans T.
    Wagner, Jeffrey
    Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 1998, 48 (08): : 701 - 710
  • [46] Determinants of farmers’ waste generation and disposal in rural areas of central China
    Xiaoqian Xu
    Blas Mola-Yudego
    Mari Selkimäki
    Xiaoning Zhang
    Mei Qu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 9011 - 9021
  • [47] Rules for managing a dental practice: waste disposal, disinfection, and sterilization
    Checchi, V.
    Montevecchi, M.
    Legnani, P.
    Cristino, S.
    Violante, F.
    Checchi, L.
    DENTAL CADMOS, 2012, 80 (04) : 184 - 202
  • [48] Determinants of farmers' waste generation and disposal in rural areas of central China
    Xu, Xiaoqian
    Mola-Yudego, Blas
    Selkimaki, Mari
    Zhang, Xiaoning
    Qu, Mei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (04) : 9011 - 9021
  • [49] An analysis of farmers' resource disposal methods for livestock and poultry waste and their determinants
    Jianhua Wang
    Junying Tao
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2020, (01) : 49 - 58
  • [50] Managing the uncertainties of low-level radioactive waste disposal
    Bullard, CW
    Weger, HT
    Wagner, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1998, 48 (08): : 701 - 710