Biotène Versus HydraSmile for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Study

被引:1
|
作者
Harley, Randall J. [1 ]
Bowers, Eve [2 ]
Li, Jinhong [3 ]
Bisignani, Mikayla [4 ]
Nilsen, Marci L. [4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Jonas T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Acute & Tertiary Care, 203 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
artificial saliva; head and neck cancer; radiation; xerostomia; BIOTENE; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIALS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/oto2.70038
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the effectiveness of 2 artificial saliva substitutes (Biot & egrave;ne vs HydraSmile) in the symptomatic management of radiation-induced xerostomia.Study DesignRandomized double-blind cross-over study.SettingSingle tertiary care academic institution.MethodsIncluded adult patients >= $<!--<semantics>-->\ge <!--</semantics>-->$6 months postradiotherapy (50-70 gy) for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx. The primary endpoint was change in overall subjective xerostomia score from baseline, through use of HydraSmile versus Biot & egrave;ne. Scores were derived from a 100-point visual analog scale, with higher scores indicating better symptomatic control. Analysis of covariance model was used to regress the difference in after-treatment measurement between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne, with respect to baseline differences.ResultsA total of 91 participants were included (mean age 63.0 years [SD 9.7]; 85.7% male; 97.8% White). Change in overall xerostomia score with respect to baseline was not significantly different between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.35 to 4.81). Compared to water alone, both HydraSmile (mean difference 7.45, 95% CI 3.61-11.29) and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 7.24, 95% CI 3.06-11.43) significantly improved overall xerostomia score. Forty (44%) patients reported a preference for Biot & egrave;ne, 46 (50.5%) preferred HydraSmile, and 5 (5.5%) had no preference. Patients who preferred Biot & egrave;ne did not significantly benefit from HydraSmile, whereas those who preferred HydraSmile did not significantly benefit from Biot & egrave;ne.ConclusionBiot & egrave;ne and HydraSmile significantly improved oral dryness among patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. While neither product demonstrated treatment superiority, individual product preference was predictive of greatest treatment benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Frovatriptan versus almotriptan for acute treatment of menstrual migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, Italian, comparative study
    Marco Bartolini
    Maria Adelaide Giamberardino
    Carlo Lisotto
    Paolo Martelletti
    Davide Moscato
    Biagio Panascia
    Lidia Savi
    Luigi Alberto Pini
    Grazia Sances
    Patrizia Santoro
    Giorgio Zanchin
    Stefano Omboni
    Michel D. Ferrari
    Brigida Fierro
    Filippo Brighina
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2012, 13 : 401 - 406
  • [42] Frovatriptan versus almotriptan for acute treatment of menstrual migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, cross-over, multicentre, comparative study in Italy
    Bartolini, M.
    Giamberardino, M. A.
    Lisotto, C.
    Martelletti, P.
    Moscato, D.
    Panascia, B.
    Savi, L.
    Pini, L. A.
    Sances, G.
    Santoro, P.
    Zanchin, G.
    Omboni, S.
    Ferrari, M. D.
    Fierro, B.
    Brighina, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 629 - 629
  • [43] A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study of High Cut-Off versus High-Flux Dialysis Membranes
    Lee, Darren
    Haase, Michael
    Haase-Fielitz, Anja
    Paizis, Kathy
    Goehl, Hermann
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2009, 28 (04) : 365 - 372
  • [44] Treatment of restless legs syndrome with gabapentin: A double-blind, cross-over study
    Burchell, BJ
    NEUROLOGY, 2003, 60 (09) : 1558 - 1558
  • [45] Insulin LisPro in CSII: Results of a double-blind, cross-over study.
    Zinman, B
    Chiasson, JL
    Tildesley, H
    Tsui, E
    Strack, TR
    DIABETES, 1996, 45 : 98 - 98
  • [46] DOUBLE-BLIND CROSS-OVER STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF METOPROLOL AND FLUNARIZIN ON PLATELET SEROTONIN
    GROTEMEYER, KH
    SCHLAKE, HP
    ROLF, LH
    HUSSTEDT, IW
    NEW TRENDS IN CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY: CALCIUM ANATONISTS, ACUTE NEUROLOGY, HEADACHE AND MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 1988, 7 : 218 - 220
  • [47] KETOPROFEN - DOUBLE-BLIND CROSS-OVER STUDY WITH INDOMETHACIN IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    ZUTSHI, DW
    STERN, D
    BLOCH, M
    MASON, RM
    RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 1974, 13 (01): : 10 - 16
  • [48] A double-blind cross-over study of a non-linear hearing aid
    Nilsson, P
    Vesterager, V
    Sibelle, P
    Sieck, L
    Christensen, B
    AUDIOLOGY, 1997, 36 (06): : 325 - 338
  • [49] Treatment of restless legs syndrome with gabapentin - A double-blind, cross-over study
    Garcia-Borreguero, D
    Larrosa, O
    de la Llave, Y
    Verger, K
    Masramon, X
    Hernandez, G
    NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (10) : 1573 - 1579
  • [50] A DOUBLE-BLIND, CROSS-OVER STUDY ON MAX-EPA IN HUMAN SLE
    WESTBERG, G
    TARKOWSKI, A
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1990, 37 (05) : 1387 - 1387