Biotène Versus HydraSmile for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Study

被引:1
|
作者
Harley, Randall J. [1 ]
Bowers, Eve [2 ]
Li, Jinhong [3 ]
Bisignani, Mikayla [4 ]
Nilsen, Marci L. [4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Jonas T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Acute & Tertiary Care, 203 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
artificial saliva; head and neck cancer; radiation; xerostomia; BIOTENE; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIALS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/oto2.70038
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the effectiveness of 2 artificial saliva substitutes (Biot & egrave;ne vs HydraSmile) in the symptomatic management of radiation-induced xerostomia.Study DesignRandomized double-blind cross-over study.SettingSingle tertiary care academic institution.MethodsIncluded adult patients >= $<!--<semantics>-->\ge <!--</semantics>-->$6 months postradiotherapy (50-70 gy) for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx. The primary endpoint was change in overall subjective xerostomia score from baseline, through use of HydraSmile versus Biot & egrave;ne. Scores were derived from a 100-point visual analog scale, with higher scores indicating better symptomatic control. Analysis of covariance model was used to regress the difference in after-treatment measurement between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne, with respect to baseline differences.ResultsA total of 91 participants were included (mean age 63.0 years [SD 9.7]; 85.7% male; 97.8% White). Change in overall xerostomia score with respect to baseline was not significantly different between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.35 to 4.81). Compared to water alone, both HydraSmile (mean difference 7.45, 95% CI 3.61-11.29) and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 7.24, 95% CI 3.06-11.43) significantly improved overall xerostomia score. Forty (44%) patients reported a preference for Biot & egrave;ne, 46 (50.5%) preferred HydraSmile, and 5 (5.5%) had no preference. Patients who preferred Biot & egrave;ne did not significantly benefit from HydraSmile, whereas those who preferred HydraSmile did not significantly benefit from Biot & egrave;ne.ConclusionBiot & egrave;ne and HydraSmile significantly improved oral dryness among patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. While neither product demonstrated treatment superiority, individual product preference was predictive of greatest treatment benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CROSS-OVER STUDY OF HIGH CUT-OFF VERSUS HIGH-FLUX DIALYSIS MEMBRANES
    Lee, D.
    Haase, M.
    Haase-Fielitz, A.
    Paizis, K.
    Goehl, H.
    Bellomo, R.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 14 : A3 - A4
  • [22] Multivitamins do not improve radiation therapy related fatigue: Results of a double-blind randomized cross-over trial
    Kaliks-Guendelmann, R.
    Oliveira Campos, M. P.
    Souza Fede, A. B.
    Bensi, C. G.
    Trufelli, D. C.
    Pecoroni, P. G.
    Ranzatti, R. P.
    del Giglio, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [23] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of concomitant pilocarpine with head and neck irradiation for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia
    Haddad, P
    Karimi, M
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 64 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [24] Effect of lercanedipine and picotamide on cough induced by enalapril: A double blind, randomized, cross-over study
    Fogari, R
    Zoppi, A
    Corradi, L
    Mugellini, A
    Pesce, R
    Marasi, G
    Preti, P
    Salvetti, A
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 : S158 - S158
  • [25] Effects of amlodipine and indomethacin on cough induced by Benazepril: A double blind, randomized, cross-over study
    Fogari, R
    Zoppi, A
    Lusardi, P
    Corradi, L
    Mugellini, A
    Marasi, G
    Salvetti, A
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1998, 16 : S32 - S32
  • [26] The Effect of 1% Pilocarpine Mouthwash on Salivary Flow Rate in Patients with Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Motahari, Paria
    Pakdel, Farzaneh
    Hashemzadeh, Nastaran
    Heydari, Farid
    Zamiri, Reza Eghdam
    Katebi, Katayoun
    MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 15 (02) : 108 - 116
  • [27] Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study
    Kanaa, MD
    Whitworth, JM
    Corbett, IP
    Meechan, JG
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2006, 32 (04) : 296 - 298
  • [29] Influence of energy drinks on hemodynamic parameters - randomized double-blind placebo controlled cross-over study
    Olszanecka, A.
    Stopa, M.
    Lobacz, M.
    Niemczyk, M.
    Rutowska, K.
    Radko, A.
    Mikunda, A.
    Czarnecka, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 318 - 318
  • [30] Palatability of two different formulations of urea for the treatment of hyponatremia: A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study
    Colombo, Francesca
    Milani, Massimo
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2023, 58 : 350 - 354