Biotène Versus HydraSmile for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Study

被引:1
|
作者
Harley, Randall J. [1 ]
Bowers, Eve [2 ]
Li, Jinhong [3 ]
Bisignani, Mikayla [4 ]
Nilsen, Marci L. [4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Jonas T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Acute & Tertiary Care, 203 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
artificial saliva; head and neck cancer; radiation; xerostomia; BIOTENE; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIALS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/oto2.70038
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the effectiveness of 2 artificial saliva substitutes (Biot & egrave;ne vs HydraSmile) in the symptomatic management of radiation-induced xerostomia.Study DesignRandomized double-blind cross-over study.SettingSingle tertiary care academic institution.MethodsIncluded adult patients >= $<!--<semantics>-->\ge <!--</semantics>-->$6 months postradiotherapy (50-70 gy) for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx. The primary endpoint was change in overall subjective xerostomia score from baseline, through use of HydraSmile versus Biot & egrave;ne. Scores were derived from a 100-point visual analog scale, with higher scores indicating better symptomatic control. Analysis of covariance model was used to regress the difference in after-treatment measurement between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne, with respect to baseline differences.ResultsA total of 91 participants were included (mean age 63.0 years [SD 9.7]; 85.7% male; 97.8% White). Change in overall xerostomia score with respect to baseline was not significantly different between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.35 to 4.81). Compared to water alone, both HydraSmile (mean difference 7.45, 95% CI 3.61-11.29) and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 7.24, 95% CI 3.06-11.43) significantly improved overall xerostomia score. Forty (44%) patients reported a preference for Biot & egrave;ne, 46 (50.5%) preferred HydraSmile, and 5 (5.5%) had no preference. Patients who preferred Biot & egrave;ne did not significantly benefit from HydraSmile, whereas those who preferred HydraSmile did not significantly benefit from Biot & egrave;ne.ConclusionBiot & egrave;ne and HydraSmile significantly improved oral dryness among patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. While neither product demonstrated treatment superiority, individual product preference was predictive of greatest treatment benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized, double-blind cross-over study of levothyroxine bioavailability
    Krehan, A
    Dittmar, M
    Hoppen, A
    Lichtwald, K
    Kahaly, GJ
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 2002, 97 (09) : 522 - 527
  • [2] Randomized double-blind trial of amifostine versus placebo for radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer
    Lee, Maverick G. L.
    Freeman, Amanda R.
    Roos, Daniel E.
    Milner, Alvin D.
    Borg, Martin F.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (01) : 142 - 150
  • [3] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AqualiefTM Mucoadhesive Tablets in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Developed Radiation-Induced Xerostomia
    Iacovelli, Nicola Alessandro
    Ingargiola, Rossana
    Facchinetti, Nadia
    Franceschini, Marzia
    Romanello, Domenico Attilio
    Bossi, Paolo
    Bergamini, Cristiana
    Alfieri, Salvatore
    Cavalieri, Stefano
    Baron, Giovanna
    Aldini, Giancarlo
    Locati, Laura
    Orlandi, Ester
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [4] Efficacy of GUM® Hydral versus Biotène® Oralbalance mouthwashes plus gels on symptoms of medication-induced xerostomia: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study
    Anna Greta Barbe
    Yasmin Schmidt-Park
    Stefanie Hamacher
    Sonja Henny Maria Derman
    Michael Johannes Noack
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 169 - 180
  • [5] Impact of Oral Intake of Glucosylceramide Extracted from Pineapple on Xerostomia: A Double-Blind Randomized Cross-Over Trial
    Murakami, Mamoru
    Nishi, Yasuhiro
    Harada, Kae
    Masuzaki, Tomohiro
    Minemoto, Yoko
    Yanagisawa, Takahiro
    Shimizu, Takaharu
    Tsuboi, Akito
    Hamada, Taizo
    Nishimura, Masahiro
    NUTRIENTS, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [7] The Precision HYpertenSIon Care (PHYSIC) study: a double-blind, randomized, repeated cross-over study
    Sundstrom, Johan
    Lind, Lars
    Nowrouzi, Shamim
    Lytsy, Per
    Marttala, Kerstin
    Ekman, Inger
    Ohagen, Patrik
    Ostlund, Ollie
    UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 124 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [8] OBESITY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS - DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY WITH CROSS-OVER
    SHUTTER, L
    GARELL, DC
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 1966, 36 (06) : 273 - 275
  • [9] Venlafaxine versus clonidine for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients: a double-blind, randomized cross-over study
    Buijs, Ciska
    Mom, Constantijne H.
    Willemse, Pax H. B.
    Boezen, H. Marike
    Maurer, J. Marina
    Wymenga, A. N. Machteld
    de Jong, Robert S.
    Nieboer, Peter
    de Vries, Elisabeth G. E.
    Mourits, Marian J. E.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 115 (03) : 573 - 580
  • [10] Venlafaxine versus clonidine for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients: a double-blind, randomized cross-over study
    Ciska Buijs
    Constantijne H. Mom
    Pax H. B. Willemse
    H. Marike Boezen
    J. Marina Maurer
    A. N. Machteld Wymenga
    Robert S. de Jong
    Peter Nieboer
    Elisabeth G. E. de Vries
    Marian J. E. Mourits
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009, 115 : 573 - 580