Co-benefits of carbon and pollutant emission reduction in urban transport: Sustainable pathways and economic efficiency

被引:0
|
作者
Weng, Dawei [1 ]
Zhang, Huangfan [1 ]
Wen, Xiaojuan [1 ]
Hu, Xisheng [1 ]
Zhang, Lanyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Transportat & Civil Engn, Fuzhou 350108, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban passenger transportation; System dynamics; Carbon emission peak; Collaborative emission reduction; China; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA; POLICY; SECTOR; TRENDS; PM2.5; ROAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102348
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The growing demand for urban passenger transportation, driven by economic growth and urbanization, has led to substantial emissions of CO2 and other pollutants. Although significant attention has been given to CO2 reduction, the simultaneous emission of pollutants from similar sources and the benefits of their reduction emissions strategies, both in terms of emissions and economic outcomes, remain underexplored. To address the above concerns, this study has developed an urban passenger transportation emissions system dynamics (UPTE-SD) model, to analyze the economic benefits, emission trends, and synergistic effects of CO2 and pollutant reduction under different scenarios. The results show that: (1) Economic Benefits: CO2 reduction is the primary driver of economic benefits. Among single scenarios, the Transportation structure optimization policy (TSO) scenario performs best, yielding total economic benefits of 9.11 billion RMB. In combined scenarios, the TSO + technological progress policy (TP), promotion of new energy vehicle policy (PNEV) + TSO + TP, and PNEV + TSO + road green space priority development policy (RPD) + TP (composite scenario) exhibit the highest economic benefits, reaching 13.62 billion RMB, 17.04 billion RMB, and 18.44 billion RMB, respectively; (2) CO2 and Pollutant Reduction: For CO2 reduction, TSO is most effective in single scenarios (23.89 %), followed by TSO + TP (36.33 %), PNEV+TSO + TP (41.56 %), and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP (44.45 %) in combined scenarios. For pollutant reduction, PNEV performs best in single scenarios (29.67 %), followed by PNEV+TSO (38.49 %), PNEV+TSO + RPD (46.38 %), and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP (49.29 %) in combined scenarios; (3) Synergistic Emission Reduction: In terms of synergistic emission reduction, the best-performing scenarios are RPD in single scenarios, RPD + TP, PNEV+TSO + TP, and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP in combined scenarios among the recent years. The corresponding synergistic reduction coefficients are as follows: RPD (1.05), RPD + TP (0.99), PNEV+TSO + TP (0.97), and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP (1.13).
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carbon Emission Characteristics and Reduction Pathways of Urban Household in China
    Li, Zhi
    Liu, Yuze
    Zhang, Zuo
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [32] Influences and pathways of urban form and lifestyle on carbon emission reduction
    Shen, Yu-Sheng
    Lin, Ying-Chen
    Cheah, Wee
    Lin, Jianyi
    Xu, Lilai
    Li, Yanmin
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2022, 46
  • [33] Incorporating health co-benefits into regional carbon emission reduction policy making: A case study of China's power sector
    Cao, Chaoji
    Cui, XueQin
    Cai, Wenjia
    Wang, Can
    Xing, Lu
    Zhang, Ning
    Shen, Shudong
    Bai, Yuqi
    Deng, Zhu
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 253
  • [34] Monetary Health Co-Benefits and GHG Emissions Reduction Benefits: Contribution from Private On-the-Road Transport
    Liou, Je-Liang
    Wu, Pei-Ing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (11)
  • [35] The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
    Henning Tarp Jensen
    Marcus R. Keogh-Brown
    Richard D. Smith
    Zaid Chalabi
    Alan D. Dangour
    Mike Davies
    Phil Edwards
    Tara Garnett
    Moshe Givoni
    Ulla Griffiths
    Ian Hamilton
    James Jarrett
    Ian Roberts
    Paul Wilkinson
    James Woodcock
    Andy Haines
    Climatic Change, 2013, 121 : 223 - 237
  • [36] The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
    Jensen, Henning Tarp
    Keogh-Brown, Marcus R.
    Smith, Richard D.
    Chalabi, Zaid
    Dangour, Alan D.
    Davies, Mike
    Edwards, Phil
    Garnett, Tara
    Givoni, Moshe
    Griffiths, Ulla
    Hamilton, Ian
    Jarrett, James
    Roberts, Ian
    Wilkinson, Paul
    Woodcock, James
    Haines, Andy
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 121 (02) : 223 - 237
  • [37] Assessing the co-benefits of emission reduction measures in transportation sector: A case study in Guangdong, China
    Hu, Mingming
    Sha, Qinge
    Jia, Guanglin
    Liu, Yingying
    You, Yan
    Zheng, Junyu
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2023, 51
  • [38] Decarbonizing urban transport in European cities: four cases show possibly high co-benefits
    Creutzig, Felix
    Muehlhoff, Rainer
    Roemer, Julia
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [39] Evaluating regional carbon emissions trading in China: effects, pathways, co-benefits, spillovers, and prospects
    Zhu, Junming
    Ge, Zhangming
    Wang, Jiali
    Li, Xiao
    Wang, Can
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2022, 22 (07) : 918 - 934
  • [40] Effect of the carbon emissions trading policy on the co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction and air pollution control
    Dong, Zhaoyingzi
    Xia, Chuyu
    Fang, Kai
    Zhang, Weiwen
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 165