Co-benefits of carbon and pollutant emission reduction in urban transport: Sustainable pathways and economic efficiency

被引:0
|
作者
Weng, Dawei [1 ]
Zhang, Huangfan [1 ]
Wen, Xiaojuan [1 ]
Hu, Xisheng [1 ]
Zhang, Lanyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Transportat & Civil Engn, Fuzhou 350108, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban passenger transportation; System dynamics; Carbon emission peak; Collaborative emission reduction; China; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA; POLICY; SECTOR; TRENDS; PM2.5; ROAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102348
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The growing demand for urban passenger transportation, driven by economic growth and urbanization, has led to substantial emissions of CO2 and other pollutants. Although significant attention has been given to CO2 reduction, the simultaneous emission of pollutants from similar sources and the benefits of their reduction emissions strategies, both in terms of emissions and economic outcomes, remain underexplored. To address the above concerns, this study has developed an urban passenger transportation emissions system dynamics (UPTE-SD) model, to analyze the economic benefits, emission trends, and synergistic effects of CO2 and pollutant reduction under different scenarios. The results show that: (1) Economic Benefits: CO2 reduction is the primary driver of economic benefits. Among single scenarios, the Transportation structure optimization policy (TSO) scenario performs best, yielding total economic benefits of 9.11 billion RMB. In combined scenarios, the TSO + technological progress policy (TP), promotion of new energy vehicle policy (PNEV) + TSO + TP, and PNEV + TSO + road green space priority development policy (RPD) + TP (composite scenario) exhibit the highest economic benefits, reaching 13.62 billion RMB, 17.04 billion RMB, and 18.44 billion RMB, respectively; (2) CO2 and Pollutant Reduction: For CO2 reduction, TSO is most effective in single scenarios (23.89 %), followed by TSO + TP (36.33 %), PNEV+TSO + TP (41.56 %), and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP (44.45 %) in combined scenarios. For pollutant reduction, PNEV performs best in single scenarios (29.67 %), followed by PNEV+TSO (38.49 %), PNEV+TSO + RPD (46.38 %), and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP (49.29 %) in combined scenarios; (3) Synergistic Emission Reduction: In terms of synergistic emission reduction, the best-performing scenarios are RPD in single scenarios, RPD + TP, PNEV+TSO + TP, and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP in combined scenarios among the recent years. The corresponding synergistic reduction coefficients are as follows: RPD (1.05), RPD + TP (0.99), PNEV+TSO + TP (0.97), and PNEV+TSO + RPD + TP (1.13).
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Air pollution reduction co-benefits associated with low-carbon transport initiatives for carbon neutrality in China by 2060
    Zhang, Runsen
    Hanaoka, Tatsuya
    Liu, Jingyu
    Li, Zhaoling
    Sun, Lu
    ENERGY, 2024, 313
  • [22] Urban energy, carbon management (low carbon cities) and co-benefits for human health
    Milner, James
    Davies, Michael
    Wilkinson, Paul
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (04) : 398 - 404
  • [23] Co-benefits of Smart and Sustainable Energy District Projects: An Overview of Economic Assessment Methodologies
    Bisello, Adriano
    Grilli, Gianluca
    Balest, Jessica
    Stellin, Giuseppe
    Ciolli, Marco
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE PLANNING FOR CITIES AND REGIONS: RESULTS OF SSPCR 2015, 2017, : 127 - 164
  • [24] Co-benefits of transport demand reductions from compact urban development in Chinese cities
    Xiangwen Fu
    Jing Cheng
    Liqun Peng
    Mi Zhou
    Dan Tong
    Denise L. Mauzerall
    Nature Sustainability, 2024, 7 : 294 - 304
  • [25] Co-benefits of transport demand reductions from compact urban development in Chinese cities
    Fu, Xiangwen
    Cheng, Jing
    Peng, Liqun
    Zhou, Mi
    Tong, Dan
    Mauzerall, Denise L.
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 7 (03) : 294 - 304
  • [26] Scenarios of demographic distributional aspects of health co-benefits from decarbonising urban transport
    Lu, Chenxi
    Adger, W. Neil
    Morrissey, Karyn
    Zhang, Shaohui
    Venevsky, Sergey
    Yin, Hao
    Sun, Taochun
    Song, Xuanren
    Wu, Chao
    Dou, Xinyu
    Zhu, Biqing
    Liu, Zhu
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2022, 6 (06): : E461 - E474
  • [27] Emission reduction strategies and health: a systematic review on the tools and methods to assess co-benefits
    Abdala, Sammila Andrade
    Khomsi, Kenza
    Houdou, Anass
    El Marouani, Ihssane
    El Badisy, Imad
    Najmi, Houda
    Obtel, Majdouline
    Belyamani, Lahcen
    Ibrahimi, Azeddine
    Khalis, Mohamed
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [28] The future choice of technologies and co-benefits of CO2 emission reduction in Bangladesh power sector
    Mondal, Md. Alam Hossain
    Denich, Manfred
    Vlek, Paul L. G.
    ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) : 4902 - 4909
  • [29] Co-Benefits of CO2 Mitigation for NOX Emission Reduction: A Research Based on the DICE Model
    Xie, Xi
    Weng, Yuwei
    Cai, Wenjia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [30] Carbon reductions and health co-benefits from US residential energy efficiency measures
    Levy, Jonathan I.
    Woo, May K.
    Penn, Stefani L.
    Omary, Mohammad
    Tambouret, Yann
    Kim, Chloe S.
    Arunachalam, Saravanan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (03):